That is true, and I was exaggerating quite a bit... To be honest I haven't really given it a fair chance, maybe if I try reading it later when I'm not being forced to I might see what's supposed to make it good.The_root_of_all_evil said:It's not a BAD book though. I can see how you might not want to get into it...just... but in no way is it even comparable to Twiglet or any of that ilk.
That actually happened to me with Young Stalin. It's a really good book, but it's definitely not light reading and school takes up most of my time. Eventually I'll finish it, as it's certainly worth finishing.Commissar Sae said:Never, I fought my way through the absolute piece of shit that was 'grunts!' loathing every page with a fiery passion but I finished it. I've dropped series before, having lost interest in them after the first few books but I've damn well finished every book I've started.
Oh crap, forgot to finish 'Young Stalin' because I decided to take a break to read some fiction. I guess that counts, but I do intend to finish it and it was actually a pretty good read so not sure that counts.
You need to be capable of understanding that not everyone is exactly the same as you. Then you'll enjoy it.The_root_of_all_evil said:You utter utter heathen.Jacco said:The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime.
That is all.
I mean, your milage may vary.
*looks daggers at you*![]()
I got through it, but I didn't enjoy it either (though I wasn't a fan of pretty much any of the characters, Tyrion included). In particular I hated all the unnecessary filler text that felt like it was stuck in there to justify spreading the story out over multiple books, the fact that he stuck so many "twists" into the plot that they began to lose all meaning by the halfway point of the book, and how he referred to (13/14-year old) Dany's breasts almost every other page of her POV throughout the entire book.ChildofGallifrey said:I haven't managed to get through "A Game of Thrones" yet. I just don't find myself interested in the majority of the characters. The only ones I really want to read about are Tyrion Lannister and Jon Snow, but I'm afraid to just skip between their bits for fear of missing something.
Not trying to start trouble but I gotta agree... Wait! Please just hear me out before my trial and execution. I tried the books (the hobbit,Lotr) and I even tried to like the movies (I actually did walk out of the first Lotr movie) but I just couldn't. I guess its just not for me. Tolkien seems verbose and while imaginative and influential he was in dire need of an editor or at least someone to mention the magic word "pacing". I would never call the books bad though, just simply not my cup of tea. Relax fanboys your opinion is still valid and while I don't agree with it I am glad that there is a series of books that bring happiness and inspiration to those who love it the world over.DJDarque said:I will probably catch a lot of shit for this, but Lord of the Rings.
I can't agree with you about your opinion of Dan Abnett, I have to say. While I do enjoy sci-fi, I'm not really a major fan of it. I don't go out of my way to read sci-fi because it just gets boring. But Gaunt's Ghosts doesn't bore me in the slightest. It really gets my heart racing, and at the same time makes me feel so sad because every time a Ghost dies, I think "that's one less, and they'll never get any back". So it really grasps me at every level.SnakeoilSage said:I have heard some good things about Gaunt's Ghosts, but I've heard "good things" about a lot of Warhammer 40K books. I'm sorry, but at the risk of alienating myself from the setting (and it's fans) altogether: Dan Abnett is the most overrated hack I've ever read. His work isn't bad, it isn't offensive. It's boring.daftalchemist said:I don't suppose anyone has suggested to you, or you have tried reading the novels about Gaunt's Ghosts? I'm kind of meh on the 40k front for the most part, but my boyfriend told me the fluff of Gaunt's Ghosts, and it sounded cool enough to try it out. He had the first omnibus, and I got hooked hard. I bought the second one, which I am currently working on. The thing that's great about it is that it doesn't even have to be 40k, it could be a completely original sci-fi setting thought up by the author, and it would still be an amazingly well-written piece of militaristic sci-fi literature. I used to not give even the slightest shit about the Imperial Guard, and now I love them.SnakeoilSage said:I'm an on again, off again fan of Warhammer 40,000, but I cannot read any of their books. They're so poorly written it makes my head hurt.
I would say that's just my opinion.
Conversely I'm a huge fan of Jim Butcher's Dresden Files. I love it. Yes, it's full of cliches and melodrama. Yes, it's a campy, and cheesy, and nerdy. But the stories are fun. There hasn't been a single one of those books that hasn't moved me to blubbery joyful geek-tears because of how fun it is.
Oh, I had totally forgotten about that book. And the worst part was it was for English class, and I couldn't be bothered to read the second half of the book at all.Astoria said:To Kill A Mockingbird. I could not read past the second page. The way it's written just bored the hell outta me.