I am a chef, and what I see as a genuine good reason to send something back is anything that makes you unhappy with the meal I have given you. If it is something I can fix I will fix it. If it is a genuine dislike for the dish I will offer you something else. If there is no way I can make you happy I will give you your money back. At the very worst if you are being unreasonable I will call you dick once I am back in the safety of my kitchen, but never will I mishandle your food.tobyornottoby said:And what do chefs see as genuine good reasons and what not?Colour-Scientist said:My boyfriend is a chef, and he wanted you all to know that if you send food back and there is genuinely something wring with it, chefs don't, by and large, spit on it or fuck with it like that. It's gross and they hate the implication.
However, if you send it back for no good reason, well... just don't.
[sub]He's a very angry man though.[/sub]
Anyone that would spit in or put something gross in food for any reason is not a chef and would probably be stabbed by a real chef. Simple put Chefs respect food, and we truly care about providing the best possible food.
Please keep in mind that not every restaurant has a Chef, and cooking professionally doesn't make a a Chef. Their are people in the food industry that do those types of things and it makes me angry. In my opinion there is a special place in hell for those people, right next to child molesters and people who talk at the theater.