Lol. very funny trying to visualize that.chuckman1 said:Am I the only one that thought of Cloud Strife when I read the title.
On topic. what an ass.
Lol. very funny trying to visualize that.chuckman1 said:Am I the only one that thought of Cloud Strife when I read the title.
It never said he played GTA.. I wouldn't exactly go off and blame it on the kid so easily as in the end if things are actually true and the guy snapped because of the loss of a virtual world.. Shouldn't we be more concerned about the over-excessive reaction of the adult here instead of the possibility that a child played GTA?gl1koz3 said:One of the reasons 8 year olds should not be playing games like GTA. Give him Mario or something else that doesn't seem like he's been sucked into the Matrix and that severing the link will kill him...
I think I misread the title. You summed up what I think about it well now.Protomega said:It never said he played GTA.. I wouldn't exactly go off and blame it on the kid so easily as in the end if things are actually true and the guy snapped because of the loss of a virtual world.. Shouldn't we be more concerned about the over-excessive reaction of the adult here instead of the possibility that a child played GTA?gl1koz3 said:One of the reasons 8 year olds should not be playing games like GTA. Give him Mario or something else that doesn't seem like he's been sucked into the Matrix and that severing the link will kill him...
You personally no I haven't. All I have been trying to say is just because there is a bit of negative media surrounding a game, system or anything to do with the industry doesn't mean they are all out to get us.Cowabungaa said:Hooo take it easy there. All I'm saying is that one simple little word can have quite a big effect, you'd really be surprised. But you never caught me raising the pitchforks against this man or the newspaper now did you?squid5580 said:Oh I see now. It is because of one adjective that the article is anti gaming even though there is way more emphasis on him being an ex-soldier than GTA or video games. Got it. Nope no hypersensitivity here.
Not explicitly blaming something doesn't mean there isn't an implied issue in mentioning a game as being 'ultra-violent' in context of a person doing something incredibly violent...squid5580 said:Did you bother to read the article? It stated the facts. GTA is a ultra-violent game. The kid deleted his account that lead to the attack. No where does it blame anything, just states the events as they occurred. This hypersensitivity is just as ridiculous as the other side's.MiracleOfSound said:I blame the videogame, not the traumatic and life altering events that can come with being a soldier.
Er...no. PTSD doesn't cause people to randomly go into violent homicidal rampages. The most common symptoms are disturbed sleep, memory problems and depression.brainless_fps_player said:PTSD, guys.
A massive problem that most western armies, USA in particular, fail to address properly.
Mind you, it didn't tell us that he'd actually been to a warzone. Quite a lot of detail on the video game, though.
One wonders if there's any bias in this article.
The video game is most likely irrelevant. There has to be other factors that made him stand on a child.
And why are we being so harsh on the mother for lying. If the guy can beat a child, I bet he has no problems wife beating/threatening.
I'm just going out on a limb here and saying that this is probably the most logical possibility I have seen in a nutshell. It's funny how if you have anger issues you can get into the military, in fact most children go into boot camp for their anger, but if you are on anti-depressants you aren't even allowed to do most desk jobs for the military as a pistol is a part of your uniform.Kopikatsu said:Edit: What I'm saying is, the fact that he is a solider, and that it was over a video game aren't relevant to the article. The man just had anger issues.
To be fair, toast is some important shit. If anyone fucked around with MY delicious toast....Valksy said:1) If it hadn't been the GTA save file, it would have been something else. If the kid had dropped his toast on the carpet, would we blame the toast?
Well honestly, gaming and gaming enthusiasts do stand in an overal negative light in a large part of the media. That in term creates certain prejudges in a lot of people that said enthusiasts feel rather threatened about. And the fact that a videogame is once again involved, no matter how minor, again reinforces those prejudices. The reaction you're seeing from lots of people here has become a sort of flinch, a defensive reflex.squid5580 said:You personally no I haven't. All I have been trying to say is just because there is a bit of negative media surrounding a game, system or anything to do with the industry doesn't mean they are all out to get us.
I shudder to think how many gamers have already sent angry letters to them reinforcing the negative stereotype they are "trying to portray."
How do you know if he's not? The only evidence that you have is an article on the internet. This whole thing could be an elaborate hoax for all you know.Aphex Demon said:Jesus fuck. Look what I just found on the internet.
http://donadiosinnocent.com/
Seriously...
The key words you used is COMMON SYMPTOMS. PTSD has been known to cause violent outbursts and lack of control. Sure it's uncommon, but the army is enormous. If there are ten thousand people in a combat zone, which there are, statistically at least five hundred of those are going to struggle to reintegrate, have drinking problems, suffer depression, become violent or other symptoms associated with PTSD, depending on the people's profile. Out of that five hundred at least five people are going to be violent anyway, so PTSD only exacerbates that kind of disposition.Kopikatsu said:Er...no. PTSD doesn't cause people to randomly go into violent homicidal rampages. The most common symptoms are disturbed sleep, memory problems and depression.brainless_fps_player said:PTSD, guys.
A massive problem that most western armies, USA in particular, fail to address properly.
Mind you, it didn't tell us that he'd actually been to a warzone. Quite a lot of detail on the video game, though.
One wonders if there's any bias in this article.
The video game is most likely irrelevant. There has to be other factors that made him stand on a child.
And why are we being so harsh on the mother for lying. If the guy can beat a child, I bet he has no problems wife beating/threatening.
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd/what-are-the-symptoms-of-ptsd.shtml
There's a link to the full list. None of them include 'Kill everything around you to death'.
Also, most people in the military are actually MORE mentally stable than normal people.
Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the vice-chief of staff of the Army who has led the effort to reduce suicides, said that 79% of suicides were soldiers who had one deployment or had yet to be deployed.
Keep in mind, the suicide rate for the US military is LESS than the suicide rate for America. (America is like 16.5 suicides per 100,000 people, and the Military is around 12)
Edit: What I'm saying is, the fact that he is a solider, and that it was over a video game aren't relevant to the article. The man just had anger issues.
Again, the list.brainless_fps_player said:The key words you used is COMMON SYMPTOMS. PTSD has been known to cause violent outbursts and lack of control. Sure it's uncommon, but the army is enormous. If there are ten thousand people in a combat zone, which there are, statistically at least five hundred of those are going to struggle to reintegrate, have drinking problems, suffer depression, become violent or other symptoms associated with PTSD, depending on the people's profile. Out of that five hundred at least five people are going to be violent anyway, so PTSD only exacerbates that kind of disposition.Kopikatsu said:Er...no. PTSD doesn't cause people to randomly go into violent homicidal rampages. The most common symptoms are disturbed sleep, memory problems and depression.brainless_fps_player said:PTSD, guys.
A massive problem that most western armies, USA in particular, fail to address properly.
Mind you, it didn't tell us that he'd actually been to a warzone. Quite a lot of detail on the video game, though.
One wonders if there's any bias in this article.
The video game is most likely irrelevant. There has to be other factors that made him stand on a child.
And why are we being so harsh on the mother for lying. If the guy can beat a child, I bet he has no problems wife beating/threatening.
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/post-traumatic-stress-disorder-ptsd/what-are-the-symptoms-of-ptsd.shtml
There's a link to the full list. None of them include 'Kill everything around you to death'.
Also, most people in the military are actually MORE mentally stable than normal people.
Gen. Peter Chiarelli, the vice-chief of staff of the Army who has led the effort to reduce suicides, said that 79% of suicides were soldiers who had one deployment or had yet to be deployed.
Keep in mind, the suicide rate for the US military is LESS than the suicide rate for America. (America is like 16.5 suicides per 100,000 people, and the Military is around 12)
Edit: What I'm saying is, the fact that he is a solider, and that it was over a video game aren't relevant to the article. The man just had anger issues.
So, you are right. PTSD doesn't cause random violence 99.9% of the time. It will, however, make a usually docile angry person more likely to lash out.
And I didn't mention suicide, so I don't dispute your point there.