Strazdas said:
OniaPL said:
Lottery and religion are two different entities which do not belong in the same category, you can't compare them. I fail to see what you intended to convey with this comparison.
And how do you determine "a good cause"? There is no universal, objective good cause.
Both run on people stupidity and false belief.
While not objective, a universal good cause is one that ensures existence. Stupidity and blind belief does not fall into that. although i do agree lottery is not the best example. However when people think they can heal cancer with prayer this does not help humanity. or maybe it does, it weeds out the stupid.
Well, the stupidity of belief depends entirely on a) how the person expresses his faith and b) the point of view from which you are assessing the situation.
Wesstboro Baptist Church? Yes, that's stupid.
Terrorist organizations using religion as a way to recruit pawns? Yeah, not that good either.
A person refusing treatment because it's not what God intended? Yeah, dumb.
But the part that you are forgetting is that these are all
extremes. Every religion, faction, organization etc. has it's extreme sides. If you right now go out and walk up to an average, sensible christian/muslim/buddhist/whatever, they will not tell you to burn in hell because you are an ungodly monster. These extremes will always exist, but their existence does not invalidate everything else.
While in less developed countries religion remains a problem, that's not how it
has to be. Christianity, being a mjority religion in most developed countries, has evolved past that point, and I don't see why something like Islam wouldn't evolve past it's troubles with women for example.
However, if you'd say that religion, as a whole, needs to adapt to the modern world and not the other way around, that is what I'd agree with.
Strazdas said:
OniaPL said:
But that's on humanity, not religion itself. Besides, the dark ages can't be compared to modern ages since during the dark ages and before them religion played an important part in the affairs of the state while in the modern world religion largely does not have much of a say when it comes to politics, legislation or similar affairs that could hinder the scientific progress that other people strive for.
Third world countries are a different matter, of course.
Humanity made
godreligions. religion, being construct of humanity, has all the problems humanity has. While church does not have the ultimate power anymore, to say that it does not have a say in politics legislation, scientific progress of even something as simple as teaching biology in school is simply ignorant. Do you not remember the incident when a woman sued the local government, because the senior home were forcing prayer before food. Or how religious zealots stopped stem cell research pre-obama? or how abortion is still not legal in many states? or how gays are shunned by religious zealots?
I do admit i attacked you too zealously, i am like that, and for that i am sorry. but religion is a thing that should not be sought out or even suggested. Not in the state it is now anyway.
Aren't those all incidents that happened in USA aside from the LGBT community's grievances with religious folk? I hadn't even heard of this "senior home forcing prayer" bit.
While those are things that happened, judging all religious folk for it would be the same as me judging all americans for the bad apples that their country has.
Besides, USA as a nation is so divided that it has become the land of extremes as far as I am aware, and therefore there are a lot of religious extremists on the move. But it's the same with any other thing over there.
I'm largely afraid that we have ran into one of the problems of the internet discussion which has created a disconnect between us. I'm talking as a citizen of Finland; In my country religion has no say in the teaching of biology, nobody's forcing prayer on anyone and abortion is perfectly legal. IT just is there, and helps some people to get through their days.
Meanwhile you are arguing on behalf of the USA (which is a mess of a country anyways), where things are different and at least if I am to trust the image news gives me, everyone is a raving lunatic.
I guess my main problem with your argument is that while religion has it's bad sides, the majority is at the very least neutral. You don't hear about the man who gets a feeling of happiness from the thought of a god watching over him, nor do you hear about the events that the church organizes that some people enjoy etc.
Religion brings a lot to some peoples lives, but all you ever hear in the media are the crazy ones, who are the "vocal minority".