Exploration Team Discovers Mysterious Disc on Ocean Floor

Recommended Videos

soren7550

Overly Proud New Yorker
Dec 18, 2008
5,477
0
0
FinalFreak16 said:
....Atlantis! We finally found it! If futurama is anything to go by there should be mermaids too!
That's Atlanta, and we got some time before they detach themselves to become a better tourist attraction.
 

Chris646

New member
Jan 3, 2011
347
0
0
digitupdigitupdigitupdigitupdigitup
I really want to know what it is now. I believe in the Millennium Falcon theory because I=Nerd
 

tahrey

New member
Sep 18, 2009
1,124
0
0
FelixG said:
creationis apostate said:
Twilight.falls said:
I find it confounding that the guy says he won't even attempt to look at it.
You are kidding right? Do you know how expensive it is to deep sea dive? It is most likely a rock. Literally 5 million dollars for a rock. Grow up.
it costs 5 million to go down 300 feet? Damn someone is getting gouged there...
Pay me a few thousand for the training and the nitrox kit (hmm... that's a little over 90m... tri-mix, even?) and I'll do it myself...

However if we've got the units screwed up, Nasa-style, and it's 300m, you'll be needing a dive bell (and probably a week in a decompression tank) or some kind of submersible. All the same, it's not going to stretch into millions, maybe just a few tens of thousands.

What I'd like to point out though, is two things:

1. These kind of shadow-relief images can trick your mind - what it looks like can be heavily dependent on orientation (and, if you then rotate it, the orientation you first saw it in). Printed the wrong way up, a crater can look like a dome, etc. If you rotate this one, at some angles it looks more like a small volcanic caldera on top of a tapered ridge, and undersea volcanoes aren't that rare.

2. What's that second mirrored-ish trace on the right hand side of the screen, cut off in some of the images? It seems to have a faint outline of the same thing on there, but lacking a lot of definition and seeming more like a pattern in sand. Is it's "WOW THERES A DISC ON THE FLOOR" appearance maybe highly dependent on the angle of the scanner and some very heavy reprocessing to raise the contrast and pick out even the tiniest details in high relief? I can get a mysterious circle with my digital camera by doing similar by getting a tiny speck of rain on the lens then pointing it at a blank surface.
 

GonzoGamer

New member
Apr 9, 2008
7,063
0
0
Blueruler182 said:
Oh, good, I'm not the only one who noticed it looks like the Alluminum Falcon.
"What the hell is an Aluminum Falcon?'
Sorry, had to.

I'm curious as to why the guy who discovered it is so "meh."
Is it not that unusual?
 

Houss

New member
Mar 17, 2010
4
0
0
1. These kind of shadow-relief images can trick your mind - what it looks like can be heavily dependent on orientation (and, if you then rotate it, the orientation you first saw it in). Printed the wrong way up, a crater can look like a dome, etc. If you rotate this one, at some angles it looks more like a small volcanic caldera on top of a tapered ridge, and undersea volcanoes aren't that rare.
Volcanoes in the Baltic sea? Don't think so bro...
 

Jymm

New member
Sep 18, 2010
42
0
0
Don't worry Peter Lindberg is trying to make money off this.

I present to you ....




For only 29 dollars (US). :/
 

MajorDolphin

New member
Apr 26, 2011
295
0
0
So the thing is 20 meters wide...

Found between Sweden and Finland...

Could it be the object that caused this?
http://mysteryoftheinquity.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/2252952_f520.jpg?w=450&h=298

:D
 

CrazyGirl17

I am a banana!
Sep 11, 2009
5,141
0
0
Huh... it kinda does looks like the Millennium Falcon...

OT: Why do I feel like this is some marketing scheme...?
 

keideki

New member
Sep 10, 2008
510
0
0
Treblaine said:
keideki said:
When I look at this, the only thing I can think of is this book.

http://www.amazon.com/Sphere-Michael-Crichton/dp/0062044915/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1312399371&sr=1-1
"It is not in our sphere of interest to go for this object"


Hooooooooly shiiiii-
Mind is blown! I never even noticed this! Bricks have been shat.
 

OutforEC

Professional Amateur
Jul 20, 2010
427
0
0
Word of the day: Apophenia: Seeing meaningful patterns in meaningless data.
 

MarsProbe

Circuitboard Seahorse
Dec 13, 2008
2,372
0
0
I'm disappointed they're not chasing this up. Surely there must be some crazy person out there with an abundance of funds willing to potentially waste a large sum of money hauling whatever this thing is up. Some may say it's junk, but I'm betting that's FTL travel and clean, limitless energy sitting down there... Get it done!
 

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
Meteorite?- No, meteors have never left trails. They always go so fast that they leave just a big [a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_Crater]hole[/a].

Volcanoe?- There are no volcanoes in the Baltic Sea.

Aircraft Crash?- Well that trail is similiar to a plane crash in terms of its length, but why is the last part in a circular formation and where is the debris?

Sunken Ship or Submarine?- There is no way that a ship could land in a position where it seems like a circle and there is no recorded ship that looks like that. And neither would a submarine land in that position. Plus, that doesn't explain the trial which I assure you is a impact trial of some kind.

A rock?- Still doesn't explain the trail.

A camera trick?- Possibly but that has to be one complex trick of the camera/imager.

A UFO- Silly person, UFOs don't exist. But weather balloons do!
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Aprilgold said:
"Because circles don't appear in nature"
LOOK AT YOUR EYES, THEIR CIRCLES!

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Circles+in+nature&view=detail&id=C0887C64F0D8EF804B07B39D46EE952FFB4769CF&first=0

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Circles+in+nature&view=detail&id=C0887C64F0D8EF804B07B39D46EE952FFB4769CF&first=0

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Circles+in+nature&view=detail&id=C0887C64F0D8EF804B07B39D46EE952FFB4769CF&first=0

Also, all of these, there, he just proves he is false.
That's a terrible example as a ripple from a puddle is totally transient. Better to post this:

http://www.mreclipse.com/Observatory/Crater/full/Crater99-121w.JPG

But still, a meteorite crater even in a desert with minimal erosion or deposition the circular shape is not that strong.

Any way, this is under water, a meteorite would blow up as it hit the water, not glide right through till it hit the sea floor, then punch a hole with incomplete but perfectly curved circular edges.
 

tahrey

New member
Sep 18, 2009
1,124
0
0
Houss said:
1. These kind of shadow-relief images can trick your mind - what it looks like can be heavily dependent on orientation (and, if you then rotate it, the orientation you first saw it in). Printed the wrong way up, a crater can look like a dome, etc. If you rotate this one, at some angles it looks more like a small volcanic caldera on top of a tapered ridge, and undersea volcanoes aren't that rare.
Volcanoes in the Baltic sea? Don't think so bro...
Fair enough. I can't find any evidence of them either.

Though, this could be the first :D

Or a geyser, or some other natural disturbance of the sea floor. Given that my main point was that, depending how you read the chart, it might actually be a circular depression rather than a lump, it may even be an impression in the sand from some strange and very localised vortex current?

Still, it's not that far down. If they'll release the co-ordinates it shouldn't be a massive issue for interested amateurs to go there and dive down for a closer look, or send a cheap ROV (like the one that was powered/ballasted with a load of C-cells) to grab some video.