FelixG said:
creationis apostate said:
Twilight.falls said:
I find it confounding that the guy says he won't even attempt to look at it.
You are kidding right? Do you know how expensive it is to deep sea dive? It is most likely a rock. Literally 5 million dollars for a rock. Grow up.
it costs 5 million to go down 300 feet? Damn someone is getting gouged there...
Pay me a few thousand for the training and the nitrox kit (hmm... that's a little over 90m... tri-mix, even?) and I'll do it myself...
However if we've got the units screwed up, Nasa-style, and it's 300m, you'll be needing a dive bell (and probably a week in a decompression tank) or some kind of submersible. All the same, it's not going to stretch into millions, maybe just a few tens of thousands.
What I'd like to point out though, is two things:
1. These kind of shadow-relief images can trick your mind - what it looks like can be heavily dependent on orientation (and, if you then rotate it, the orientation you first saw it in). Printed the wrong way up, a crater can look like a dome, etc. If you rotate this one, at some angles it looks more like a small volcanic caldera on top of a tapered ridge, and undersea volcanoes aren't that rare.
2. What's that second mirrored-ish trace on the right hand side of the screen, cut off in some of the images? It seems to have a faint outline of the same thing on there, but lacking a lot of definition and seeming more like a pattern in sand. Is it's "WOW THERES A DISC ON THE FLOOR" appearance maybe highly dependent on the angle of the scanner and some very heavy reprocessing to raise the contrast and pick out even the tiniest details in high relief? I can get a mysterious circle with my digital camera by doing similar by getting a tiny speck of rain on the lens then pointing it at a blank surface.