Well its not really is it? I mean Nintendo done it first, Microsoft with Xbox next. I mean, even Sonys PS3 controllers are a little motion senored, so tell me then. Does that really not look like the Gaming Industry is pushing forward the idea of Motion sensore? It sounds ballocks with that amount of information in front of your eyes that you disagree and say its a bullshit accusation right?apsham said:Backing it behind "Ohh, I have an opinion" is shitty and lazy, especially when the "opinion" is flawed, and yes.. it was.Vasioth said:Well its an opinion right? In my opinion your a tit, but tits will be tits right? The problem overall is the move that Xbox is forwarding. I mean Motion sensoring doesn't work on the Wii, so I really don't see how Xbox will overcome this problem. Then again, you never know... but before you know it, Natal won't be an optional way of playing games. I think in a way, Motion Sensoring will destroy Gaming, I'd even be surprised if the home consoles will still be going strong in the next 10 years as neither 2 out of the 3 of the businesses make a jot out of sales beside Nintendo at the moment =\ and god knows why that is as well.apsham said:So a good reason not to buy it, is because of a likely totally optional feature.Stormz said:A good reason not to buy it. I hate motion control and if this is the future of the 360 I'll be pissed.
That's rather cynically assholeish to say.
I'll strongly take the same view as Yahtzee has to Peter Molyneux. Who?
And if you seriously think this is heading towards some kind of all motion sensored era of gaming, you're sorely mistaken as well. Never happen.
And its not lazy either to say an opinion. You just stated an opinion right back at me correct? Fucking idiot...