Tell it like it is, people are sheep, spin some disaster, like rampant sex offenders, terrorists, illegal aliens, get plastered all over the news 24/7 then pass a bunch of laws that strip your rights even further.Nurb said:As evil as facebook is, also selling your personal information to corporations while you don't see a dime, people are fucking themselves over.
This is why "reasonable expectation of privacy" is changing in lawbooks, people don't give a shit. They'll whine and whine, but keep posting photos of themselves that contain GPS data to a site that profits on their willingness to give up privacy.
Stop using it.
A lot of the sex offenders on the list are boys 15 years old and undernexus said:Some people have been entered into the sex offender registry for urinating on the side of the road, drunkenly or not. Others have been put on because their girlfriend was 15 and they were 18, etc. There is a website, I forget the name.. but it tracks a bunch of "absurd cases" like this. There were many involving "just over and under the legal age of consent" type of charges.Blablahb said:Well 'sex offender' in the crazy US law system can mean anything between a totally innocent victim of stupid prudish Christian laws, to a heinous rapist who really should be locked up, so I've no idea how to feel about this.
Except that the lack of protection of suspect rights in the US again shocks me. Just making pictures like that, full names. Who benefits from that? Nobody.
What this means is you get placed on the "registry", forever.. for the rest of your life. It's not something you can hide or ever get rid of as far as I know.
They did mention he was a "dangerous sex offender", so he's probably a "real" one I'm assuming.
![]()
http://freestudents.blogspot.com/2009/09/there-is-fury-and-and-sadness-inside.html
This.Kopikatsu said:If you don't want people to know your personal information, then you probably shouldn't be volunteering that information on a social network. Just sayian.
Just Facebook? I thought it was a pretty common rule for the entirety of the internet, wasn't there a huge "Stranger Danger-esque" period about it not that long ago?Andy Chalk said:... but I feel compelled to point out that this really says something about the state of privacy of Facebook. If you're not careful, you have none, and even if you do take care about what you feed into the system, assuming that you have any sort of built-in protection is just asking for trouble. That's okay if you're a wanted criminal, but for the rest of us, it should be a little disconcerting.
Well, first of all, it IS possible to make all your information public. It's also extremely common - just type a random name into the search field on facebook - for people with otherwise private profiles to still publicly show "core" information - date of birth, hometown, relationship status...Clankenbeard said:I'm on Facebook, but just barely. Somebody point out the hole in my logic when you see it...
This 22-year old girl "liked" the local police station Facebook account. Now at that point, someone with access the police account had to see that flag and then go check out her out. On Facebook, you can't see a person's timeline unless they accept you as a friend. Does anybody set their defualt to "make everythign public"? Is that even possible? I went to Samantha Dillow's Facebooks page. I am allowed to look at a couple of her family (I assume) pictures, but there is nothing there that indicated who her boyfriend is.
The police in Hannover, Germany does have facebook page that regularly asks for witnesses and informs about ongoing searches for wanted criminals - they did have some success where facebook users from the area could actually help with investigations, identify perps and whatnot. Stands to reason that the administrator in charge of running the profile would check out new "likes" on the off chance of spotting people who are already in their sights. In this particular case, it's one click from "Samantha Dillow likes your facebook page" to her profile, which in turn says right on top "Samantha Dillow is in a relationship with Dyllan Naecher". Which is a name you've got on your mind since you posted the story about the guy just yesterday.Clankenbeard said:How did the police station get from her "Like" to being able to see who her boyfriend is. And then, how the heck did they recognize him as a wanted man? The police Facebook timeline DOES have a listing that they were looking for him the day before (Tuesday the 11th). The pictures of him being brought in are on the 12th.
A "sex offender" can be anything from a serial rapist to a guy who flashed his privates at an old lady while drunk. This one was probably nearer the latter category? *is only speculating*BX3 said:Why does a sex offender have a girlfriend...? Unless she was ignorant to his situation, which I doubt, it kinda blows my mind open.
I'm not really, but that does happen. I stated a fact about what happened to that little girl in Detroit, but all governments have a history of using information against people who the state consider to be a dissident. It is just something that historically happens. Like I said, it's not bad it was used to take down a sex offender, but I do think there should be limitations on what governments can use against citizens.The Plunk said:Either you're being ridiculously hyperbolic, or America is closer to an authoritarian dictatorship than I had thought.Baresark said:I can agree whole heartedly with the final sentiments of this article. Any government agency will use anything at their disposal to get what they want. This time it was a sex offender, in the future it may be any dissenting opinion about current "regimes".
/endparanoia
We all know they wanted to shoot the guy. A lot of police officers feel they are part of some sort of military operation and love to be able to shoot people with little no repercussions. Cops in Detroit shoot and kill 4 year old girls sleeping on their grandmothers lap. A sex offender has a big target painted on him. They were probably pretty upset about not shooting....I would like to ask the community to join me in thanking the hard working deputies that brought this fugitive in without incident.
Fwoo, got that off my chest. Now I feel better. The availability heuristic at work is a fine thing.
How the fuck did a "Like" provide them with name and address?For some reason, she "liked" the Tazewell County Sheriff's Office Facebook page, which provided deputies with information including her name and address.