Fallout 3-like it hasn't been reviewed enough
- Thread starter Gerazzi
- Start date
Recommended Videos
This was not a review. It was a random ramble about a few various and small points of the game. And since when was carrying over capacity considered a 'plot hole'? I mean, we're in a world where people live with giant cockroaches, tentacled human/horse hybrids, mutants and ghouls. Not to mention a large abundance of weaponry and ammo just lying about (mini nukes? Case in point) and payment for things is made with bottle caps which, for a currency, seems in odd abundance.
That said, how is it odd that your character can carry three gatling lasers, Power Armour and four missile launchers? Would you rather a game that forced everyone to choke on realism by only allowing you to carry what an ordinary human could? That would be a shitty game.
Also, pro-tip for the next 'review' you write (please don't):
- Read some professional reviews, such as those made by the fabulous staff here. Write something more in line with that, as opposed to your own ramblings.
- Read it back to yourself in the same way you wrote it. If it reads like there's a run-on sentence, it is.
- Take consideration for what you write and how you structure it. God forbid you should use basic paragraphing.
That said, how is it odd that your character can carry three gatling lasers, Power Armour and four missile launchers? Would you rather a game that forced everyone to choke on realism by only allowing you to carry what an ordinary human could? That would be a shitty game.
Also, pro-tip for the next 'review' you write (please don't):
- Read some professional reviews, such as those made by the fabulous staff here. Write something more in line with that, as opposed to your own ramblings.
- Read it back to yourself in the same way you wrote it. If it reads like there's a run-on sentence, it is.
- Take consideration for what you write and how you structure it. God forbid you should use basic paragraphing.
Whine and *****, is that all you guys ever do here. Why does everyone on the internet insist on finding every little flaw, for f**ks sake. Give the guy a break. I liked the review, and I agree that it is a very good game. I'd like to see how you'd all feel if you wrote an article you thought was good and people nitpicked at every single flaw.
We're on a forum.
People discussing the pro's and con's of other people's ideas and writing.
I didn't say anything before about the actual OP because it's already been said - good try, next time format your article and try to add more details constructively.
I don't think everyone was that hard on the OP.
People discussing the pro's and con's of other people's ideas and writing.
I didn't say anything before about the actual OP because it's already been said - good try, next time format your article and try to add more details constructively.
I don't think everyone was that hard on the OP.
There's a lot wrong with the game. Chief among those things: It's far and away a worse game than the original, which was made more than a dozen years ago. Pathetic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xK30k2WTxY0 <- the quote starts at 1:14, it's from Ronald Reagans speach when the berlin wall fell.The Amazing Orgazmo said:
And the OP never once used Enter to separate his lines, ending in a huge wall of text...get it now?
