What about the vault filled with Garys? I laughed my ass off in there.Ryans Solution said:Yes... well fallout 3 was good, it was missing the humour.
What about the vault filled with Garys? I laughed my ass off in there.Ryans Solution said:Yes... well fallout 3 was good, it was missing the humour.
I didn't find much of the WW stuff without help,but I did find Jimmy's Well which came with that awesome BB gun. But I found a lot more Wild Wasteland stuff in Old World Blues like Dr. Mobius mentioning his Plan 9 and the cyber dogs playing poker. Old World Blues was the funnest thing I did in New Vegas and it was worth the 10 bucks I payed.Hotshots said:Too right. I chose that trait every time I played New Vegas. Finding Indy in the fridge made me quite literally Lologrebushi said:Only thing i wish is that the wild wasteland trait was just an option that started on, since its what i traditionally think of as "fallout"
Same here, with the exception that I played Tactics before 3, but that game isn't all that good.AlternatePFG said:Yeah, I played the originals after 3 and I ended liking them much, much more. The amount of ways to play those games are ridiculous.Dexter111 said:Btw. to all the people calling on "rose-tinted glasses" (I haven't read the thread but I bet there is a few), I didn't ever play the first Fallout before Fallout 3 came out. I played a demo when I was still in my early teens and didn't "get it" e.g. the combat system and what you have to do... maybe it was just a bad demo cause I randomly attacked people in a settlement and ended up getting killed and I ended up playing it after Fallout 3 and it is still miles fucking above that game in about every way. It's actually one of my favorite games by now, and I also enjoy it more than Fallout 2.
Playing new vegas felt, simply put, like coming home again. I have been playing it basically non stop since it came out. The last game I did what with was... well... probably fallout 2.Hotshots said:First and foremost, I love Fallout 3. I fucking adore the thing like it was my own. I love the whole series in such a way. I was recently re-playing the whole series (including tactics) as a remedy for the summer draught. Now, since I haven't played most of the games since maybe 2005, I played a bit of each to see if they're all working. When it got to testing F3, the game felt remarkably different from the previous ones (not because of game play or new perspective I should mention). It felt very dark and, well, not very like a fallout game(?). Then I tested New Vegas and straight away it felt like the black isle games. More humor and it felt familiar.
F2(short of being my favorite game of all time) and New Vegas feel extremely similar, which probably explains my fondness of the latter.
Has anyone else felt this way? That Fallou 3 felt 'different'?
That's funny because I thought that was one of the worst moments. It reminded me of Oblivion when Martin defeats Mehrunes Dagon, I felt robbed of my importance, instead it was given to some large and invincible character who took the feeling of importance away from me.theriddlen said:Fallout 3 is a very good game, but it only has one awesome moment, that is Liberty Prime in action,
Bingo.Necromancer Jim said:Fallout 3 was a great game on it's own, but the writing was bad. The dialogue was atrocious, the story was rubbish, and it just felt completely out of the rest of the Fallout universe.
If you wanted Fallout 1 and 2, you should have played Fallout 1 and 2. Admit it, Fallout 3 was doomed from the start, when it comes to the fanboy group. Oh no, it's made by Bethesda, it's 3D, has a FPS/TPS perspective, and real-time combat. Burn it at the stake. And Fallout 3 is far, FAR from a gritty survival game, with a lot of modding (about a year's worth, in my case), you can sort of get a survival feel going, but the vanilla game is a laugh, you can unload 20 rounds into an unarmoured human, and he shrugs it off...Imbechile said:Yes, and I can also say that i didn't want F3 to be like this. If I wanted a gritty post-apocalyptic survivial game, I would play STALKER or something.Slayer_2 said:but if I wanted a comedy, I'd watch Two and a Half Men or something
Well clearly it must be, because you say so. Your word is God, and differing opinions are VERBOTEN. Get off your high horse. Fallout was never hard, and yes, you COULD beat the game in the worst armor possible. How do I know? Because I've actually done it. Start to finish, wearing nothing but Vault suit.Kashrlyyk said:No, it is not. They completely destroyed the character and skill system. There is a video where someone makes the worst unarmed combat fighter that is possible in Fallout 3 and then beats up 3 raiders on hard difficulty. Chance to hit? Over 80% as shown in VATS!!! Good luck trying that on any of the proper fallout games.Jennacide said:...
Fallout 3 is still a proper Fallout game.....
The character system is a very important part of a RPG.
I've never played a fallout game before 3.I did play Tactics before 3, but that game isn't all that good, so I'm not nostalgia-blinded.Slayer_2 said:If you wanted Fallout 1 and 2, you should have played Fallout 1 and 2. Admit it, Fallout 3 was doomed from the start, when it comes to the fanboy group. Oh no, it's made by Bethesda, it's 3D, has a FPS/TPS perspective, and real-time combat. Burn it at the stake. And Fallout 3 is far, FAR from a gritty survival game, with a lot of modding (about a year's worth, in my case), you can sort of get a survival feel going, but the vanilla game is a laugh, you can unload 20 rounds into an unarmoured human, and he shrugs it off...Imbechile said:Yes, and I can also say that i didn't want F3 to be like this. If I wanted a gritty post-apocalyptic survivial game, I would play STALKER or something.Slayer_2 said:but if I wanted a comedy, I'd watch Two and a Half Men or something
It seems to me that whether you like Fallout 3 is based on whether you were a fan of the previous games or not. I didn't like them much, so Fallout 3 was a (surprising) jewel for me. I expected it to be garbage, but played it once and was hooked. Fans of the previous games expected Fallout 3 to be more of the same, and were disappointed when it wasn't. The don't enjoy the game because they compare it to Fallout 1 or 2 at every turn, when they should really just enjoy the game for what it is.
You're perfectly entitled to your opinion. You have the full right to indulge in whatever you find enjoyable. I might enjoy fine wine and you'd rather indulge in Maddog 20/20 instead. There's nothing wrong with that.geier said:How about the opposite ?
I played Fallout 1 and 2 after 3 and i think the first two where rubbish.
Oh great, you can be a prostitute, o wow, someone makes omlettes out of deathclaw eggs wohooo soooo funny.
To be honest, f### the first games.
Wasn't that in the Fallout Bible which was essentially notes written by someone at Black Isle in case someone else took up the franchise (which happened)Rem45 said:What about the vault filled with Garys? I laughed my ass off in there.Ryans Solution said:Yes... well fallout 3 was good, it was missing the humour.
It's scary when your name is actually Gary. Trust me :SFalloutJack said:Only thing I have to say to you is "A vault filled with Gary clones".Ryans Solution said:Yes... well fallout 3 was good, it was missing the humour.
Funny is in the eye of the beholder.
OT: Naturally, it's 'different' in some way. It's the other end of the United States and the first time Fallout's in 3D. But arguments against the game being proper are ultimately pointless. This isn't "No Mutants Allowed", so we're not closed-minded pains in the ass.
It was pretty damn doomed. It's not an uncommon thing in the gaming world, a great game comes out, and a sequel is announced. Every fan expects the original game but way better (somehow), but you better not dare try anything new. When they get something different, tempers rise quick. People just can't accept change (not just with gaming, either). I hear people bitching about how super mutants aren't all green, and how there are so many feral ghouls and I laugh sadly, then I feel like crying over these pathetic nitpicks. Yes, Fallout 3 is different, yes the dialogue isn't perfect, but compare it to most AAA titles these days, and really THINK about the amount of content that is in it, and how much time and work even that took. To make sure everything is convincing and Fallout-friendly would have taken so much longer, and frankly not been worth it to most people.Imbechile said:I've never played a fallout game before 3.I did play Tactics before 3, but that game isn't all that good, so I'm not nostalgia-blinded.Slayer_2 said:If you wanted Fallout 1 and 2, you should have played Fallout 1 and 2. Admit it, Fallout 3 was doomed from the start, when it comes to the fanboy group. Oh no, it's made by Bethesda, it's 3D, has a FPS/TPS perspective, and real-time combat. Burn it at the stake. And Fallout 3 is far, FAR from a gritty survival game, with a lot of modding (about a year's worth, in my case), you can sort of get a survival feel going, but the vanilla game is a laugh, you can unload 20 rounds into an unarmoured human, and he shrugs it off...Imbechile said:Yes, and I can also say that i didn't want F3 to be like this. If I wanted a gritty post-apocalyptic survivial game, I would play STALKER or something.Slayer_2 said:but if I wanted a comedy, I'd watch Two and a Half Men or something
It seems to me that whether you like Fallout 3 is based on whether you were a fan of the previous games or not. I didn't like them much, so Fallout 3 was a (surprising) jewel for me. I expected it to be garbage, but played it once and was hooked. Fans of the previous games expected Fallout 3 to be more of the same, and were disappointed when it wasn't. The don't enjoy the game because they compare it to Fallout 1 or 2 at every turn, when they should really just enjoy the game for what it is.
I wouldn't say that F3 was doomed from the start. Sure fans were pessimistic, but that doesn't mean shit. I don't think the fans hate F3 because it's not turn-based( I certanly hope not ), but because of the writing and the ignoring of the lore set by the previous games. New Vegas showed that those were the problems since most fans of the original liked it.
The problem with bethesda is that they forced dates on black isle (a company founded by the interplay employees who created fallout), a company that simply wanted to make fallout, the way its meant to be, while bethesda proceeds to attempt to sue them and interplay for undermining what all of a sudden bethesda thinks is their child not the creators. not the point, but fallout 3 was more of a mess than New vegas, at least new vegas tried to capture the feeling of the originals. yes this is out of context but I miss when it was borderline pen and paper, because you at least had time to write a story.Gazisultima said:It's scary when your name is actually Gary. Trust me :SFalloutJack said:Only thing I have to say to you is "A vault filled with Gary clones".Ryans Solution said:Yes... well fallout 3 was good, it was missing the humour.
Funny is in the eye of the beholder.
OT: Naturally, it's 'different' in some way. It's the other end of the United States and the first time Fallout's in 3D. But arguments against the game being proper are ultimately pointless. This isn't "No Mutants Allowed", so we're not closed-minded pains in the ass.
(btw this is directed at people complaining at Fallout 3, not the guy I quoted, I agree with you sir!)
I enjoy Fallout 3 and I enjoy New Vegas. I agree that New Vegas feels more "Fallout" and without a doubt is funnier, but that doesn't make Fallout 3 bad. In fact I think it's awesome. The RPG system works, and before anyone complains, it works fine. You can't shoot for shit at the beginning, but as you level up, it becomes easier, and enemies go down quicker. That's pretty RPG to me. There was a lot of exploration involved. Every location has some backstory if you actually take the time to look for it. The characters are interesting and varied to the point I actually care about them as people (but yet again, New Vegas wins on the character front). I think Bethesda did a cracking job considering they needed to bring Fallout into the modern market. If you went into Fallout 3 expecting a similar experience to 1 and 2, you're a moron. Bethesda isn't at your beck and call, they needed to make a game to corner as large a market as possible so they could continue making the game. First and foremost, they are a business, so of course their game isn't going to be made to your expectations as a fanboy, since you're a tiny part of the market. Their plan worked, because Fallout is now miles more popular than it ever was. That's because it evolved. It changed. I can't believe how opposed to change we are as a consumer base. It's ridiculous!