Fallout 4 Teased?
- Thread starter Tom_green_day
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Well... it's taken me over 200 to get through two very different characters (each game sitting at 110-130)... with two possible endings left and knowing they both take the same amount of time I don't think 400 is inaccurate at all.Sir Thomas Sean Connery said:
I thought it was a given that Fallout 4 will come before TES 6, so of course it's going to be in development right now.
Re-reading the twitter post, I'm not so sure that Fallout 4 is going to be announced.
Firstly, in the original twitter post he says 'there may be more of the Dog coming! Fingers crossed!' Due to the 'may' and 'fingers crossed' I definitely don't think this is set in stone, just something they hope they can tease'
Secondly, he retweeted someone saying 'either 3 dog in a fallout sequel or 3 dog in a fallout movie' which indicates he's keeping open the options of either a Fallout film or a Fallout that isn't 4 but either set in the same canon (another fallout tactics?) Or another spin-off like New Vegas.
Also apparently because of Dishonoured in 2012 and Elder Scrolls online in 2013 Bethesda don't want to release it until at least 2014. I know it's not Bethesda Game Studios making these titles, but they don't want their titles to compete and they don't want to market 2 of their own games at once. I understand this personally although it's at least a year!
Firstly, in the original twitter post he says 'there may be more of the Dog coming! Fingers crossed!' Due to the 'may' and 'fingers crossed' I definitely don't think this is set in stone, just something they hope they can tease'
Secondly, he retweeted someone saying 'either 3 dog in a fallout sequel or 3 dog in a fallout movie' which indicates he's keeping open the options of either a Fallout film or a Fallout that isn't 4 but either set in the same canon (another fallout tactics?) Or another spin-off like New Vegas.
Also apparently because of Dishonoured in 2012 and Elder Scrolls online in 2013 Bethesda don't want to release it until at least 2014. I know it's not Bethesda Game Studios making these titles, but they don't want their titles to compete and they don't want to market 2 of their own games at once. I understand this personally although it's at least a year!
If that's how long it took you, there you go.vasiD said:
After my first playthrough where I did almost all the side quests, I did far fewer the second and even less for my fourth.
All four endings took about 150 to 200 hours.
But different people play different ways.
You're looking to much into this.Tom_green_day said:
He wouldn't get the thumbs up from the devs if Fallout 4 isn't coming nor would he blatantly tease it on Twitter knowing full well that it would gain traction and hype. It's a blatant tease for another Fallout game.
Wow it's been 5 years since Fallout 3?
I look forward to seeing a new Fallout game, though my personal preference would have it be more like Fallout New Vegas than Fallout 3. Don't get me wrong Fallout 3 was a great game, and great world to explore. I just feel that just having another beautifully crafted post apocalyptic city is going to be enough. So I like Bethesda to take more heed to Obsidian's example with the story and characters. Also to take note of Fallout 3, New Vegas and Skyrim and actually do some real bug testing this time, though I feel I ask too much there
I look forward to seeing a new Fallout game, though my personal preference would have it be more like Fallout New Vegas than Fallout 3. Don't get me wrong Fallout 3 was a great game, and great world to explore. I just feel that just having another beautifully crafted post apocalyptic city is going to be enough. So I like Bethesda to take more heed to Obsidian's example with the story and characters. Also to take note of Fallout 3, New Vegas and Skyrim and actually do some real bug testing this time, though I feel I ask too much there
Yeah... it's like that in real life, too.CityofTreez said:
Anywho... I'm going to be cautiously optimistic. Fallout 3 was probably my overall least favorite game in the series, not counting that godawful and completely inexcusable one that came out for the PS2/XBox. That's not calling Fallout 3 bad, I still enjoyed it, it was just the one I enjoyed least from an overall enjoyable series.
Admittedly, I'll be a bit upset with them calling it Fallout 4 though. The numbering with the series is all sorts of messed up now since Fallout 3 is a spin-off, meanwhile the actual direct sequel to Fallout 2 - New Vegas - goes unnumbered. So now we're getting what will likely be another spin-off, or a direct sequel to Fallout 3, which will be Fallout 4. If Obsidian makes another title continuing from the end of New Vegas, it'll either have to be Fallout 5 and further confuse the progression of the series or continue to be unnumbered. It's like the spin-offs hijacked the title. Pretty minor gripe, though.
If it is in Boston with the MIT, bear in mind that they do a Pirate course and you can get a Pirate qualification, just saying. Consists of fencing and boatwork and shooting I think?