j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Phalene said:
Vern5 said:
Enough is enough. Why are most (if not all) fantasy games constantly borrowing inspiration from the Lord of the Rings? Hell, even Dungeons and Dragons is tainted by that book's ridiculous fame.
We need something new. Something fresh. Something of pure fantasy.
Uh... You realize that D&D started as a fan attempt at playing LotR? To the extent that "halfling" was supposed to be "hobbit". Tolkien INVENTED the fantasy genre as we know it. It's not a taint, per say, its deliberate design.
Complaining about Tolkien influence on fantasy is like complaining about all the French people in Paris. Not that Tolkien didn't basically do his stuff as fan fiction off all the pagan myths he was familiar with, but still...
Sorry, but no. I love Tolkien, but as I said in a previous post, he didn't
invent Fantasy. He created an incredibly detailed mythology, and was the first to create it to the standards of world-building we now expect, but fantasy itself is as old as storytelling. Look at the Odyssey. Look at Gulliver's Travels. Look at the story of St George and the Dragon. These are all fantasy stories, told hundreds of years before LOTR.
.
No, actually. The religious myths, be they the Apples of Idun, the Garden of Eden (Christian, Jewish or Muslim version), or the tales of the Monkey King (or whatever) were written/created according to a world view that accepted the magic in the stories as plausible.
As mentioned by another person, Tolkien-the-Linguist took the structure of myths he was familiar with and borrowed/stole to fit in with his made up language. Elves were not his exclusive creation, they are the people of Frey and Freya (of Teutonic/Norse myths). So what was novel in Tolkien was basically the fact that he wrote as one writing fan fiction- he didn't think it was cannon to his universe, the way that people recounting how St. George fought a dragon had originally been speaking about a literal dragon. Now every period has its atheists and obviously even before we got around to writing these myths down and they were still part of the culture's oral tradition, people were saying "Dragons? Horse pucky!", but recall it's only recently that St. George's miraculous back-story was deemed implausible enough to get it removed from the accepted Christian tradition.
Tolkien did not draw everything in his books from thin air and a fertile imagination. What he did was take his experiences, digest them and produce something -sorta- new. That's the copy-cat aspect its hard to get away from, not the plethora of fantasy races, but the act of making a (new) story out of a narrative stolen from ancient myths. So yes, he was the forefather of fantasy as we know it.
Of course you can reinvent the genre, set it in modern day, leave the pointy ears out, abandon the concept of a wizard, whatever... But you're still going to be hard pressed not to have some Tolkien-esque borrowing, at least via method.