Do you disagree with him about the "Ubermensch", Herd instinct, Will to Power, or Death of God?searanox said:Probably Nietzsche, although I disagree with about half of what he said. Incredibly influential and to some degree misunderstood thinker.
I disagree with the whole master/slave morality system he has going. Will to power is one of those things that's hard to debate, but is arguably a capitalist construction rather than human instinct. His conception of the masses is decidedly outdated when compared to later thinkers. Despite this, though, his ideas are very solid and agreeable to me. There are holes, but the general gist of his stuff is good, even though it only really works within its own context.RedDiablo said:Do you disagree with him about the "Ubermensch", Herd instinct, Will to Power, or Death of God?
Ah, well, you do have to look at his work before his anti-Semitic sister got to it. A lot of the stuff that ended up in the hands of the NASI party wasn't in his original work.searanox said:I disagree with the whole master/slave morality system he has going.RedDiablo said:Do you disagree with him about the "Ubermensch", Herd instinct, Will to Power, or Death of God?
I edited my post above a little bit.The_root_of_all_evil said:Ah, well, you do have to look at his work before his anti-Semitic sister got to it. A lot of the stuff that ended up in the hands of the NASI party wasn't in his original work.
TBF, he was also dying of syphilis at the time; but then our dahlink Father of Sexual Psychiatry was taking cocaine which makes you paranoid and impotent.searanox said:When not read correctly, without the context of his biography, and in light of how the Nazi party twisted his words, most people consider him to be an angsty little fruitcake, but the reality is that he was a man who truly loved life but was distraught at the circumstances he found himself in.
Only in the end, when he started writing Zarathustra and pretending he was an epic poet. Good work still, but a little bit over-dramatic and clearly the work of someone who was starting to lose it.The_root_of_all_evil said:TBF, he was also dying of syphilis at the time; but then our dahlink Father of Sexual Psychiatry was taking cocaine which makes you paranoid and impotent.
Wait, Major Zero in MGS, or someone else?thisnameok said:Major Zero haha. Seriously though i would say Hunter S. Thompson i guess. Although mostly Hunter is just crazy and only other crazy people... or idiots, would call him a philosopher... eh.
True, Nietzche is probably the most misunderstood philosopher ever. His idea of "Ubermensch", was someone who would overcome the weaknesses of humans now (like Religion, Art, etc), and become a superior being. But his sister, who was married to an anti-semite, edited his works, and made him seem like a posterboy for Naziism.searanox said:I edited my post above a little bit.The_root_of_all_evil said:Ah, well, you do have to look at his work before his anti-Semitic sister got to it. A lot of the stuff that ended up in the hands of the NASI party wasn't in his original work.
In any case, yes, that's why I referred to him as "misunderstood". When not read correctly, without the context of his biography, and in light of how the Nazi party twisted his words, most people consider him to be an angsty little fruitcake, but the reality is that he was a man who truly loved life but was distraught at the circumstances he found himself in.
It goes beyond that. Nietzsche's Superman isn't just one that could transcend religion and art, but could make moral decisions, not just to his own benefit but the benefit of the entire species, in any given context or environment. In otherwords, the Superman is the one who can go beyond the social construction of reality, understand it as a social construction, and then thrive in that detached existence. The only real moral absolute for Nietzsche, of course, is the will to power - so long as you act faithfully to it in the proper way, you are moral.RedDiablo said:True, Nietzche is probably the most misunderstood philosopher ever. His idea of "Ubermensch", was someone who would overcome the weaknesses of humans now (like Religion, Art, etc), and become a superior being. But his sister, who was married to an anti-semite, edited his works, and made him seem like a posterboy for Naziism.
To be fair, you'd be hard pressed to find a philosopher who didn't really enjoy hearing themselves talk. It takes a certain self-love to do what Kant and others did.ellimist337 said:Well, while waiting for text, I'll throw out not Kant. He was excessively wordy to the point of obnoxious arrogance, and writes more for himself than the betterment of others. Socrates is pretty good.
"Always forgive your enemys, nothing annoys them so much."Specter_ said:"Truth, in the matters of religion, is simply the opinion that has survived."Jagers1994 said:"A little sincerity is a dangerous thing, and a great deal of it is absolutly fatal."Specter_ said:"An excellent man: he has no enemies, and none of his friends like him."Jagers1994 said:"Genius is born, not paid."Specter_ said:"Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative. "Jagers1994 said:"Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination."Specter_ said:"We are clowns whose hearts are broken."Jagers1994 said:"The only worse than being talked about is not being talked about."Specter_ said:"There is no Sin except stupidity."Jagers1994 said:We got a winner.Specter_ said:100% Oscar Wilde.
"Life is too serious to be taken seriously."