No, the internet would still exist...just parts of it would disappear. Like certain inexplicably popular youtube channels that will go unnamed.XMark said:What we need is a law making it illegal to be willfully annoying on the internet.
Oh wait, that would probably make the internet cease to exist.
Especially with all the politicians, special interest groups, news channels, corporate sponsors, PeTA, Westboro Baptist members, and pop music stars clogging the jails if the original willfully annoying law was enforced nationwide.Avaholic03 said:No, the internet would still exist...just parts of it would disappear. Like certain inexplicably popular youtube channels that will go unnamed.XMark said:What we need is a law making it illegal to be willfully annoying on the internet.
Oh wait, that would probably make the internet cease to exist.
No, the real problem is that there isn't anywhere close to enough jail space worldwide to enforce that law.
How many summaries have you heard? That was my first.Redlin5 said:That was the best summary of all the Feed Dump openings I've ever heard.
Actually they're a type of bread. (Cupcakes are cakes.) But still.Redlin5 said:Muffins are just cake! I've been saying it for years!![]()
No, the people sending them need to learn that kiddie hats won't fit Graham's head!Callate said:...I'm beginning to get the impression that someone needs to send LRR a new crop o' hats.