Hey everyone,
Over the last few weeks I've been working on a book with the intention of having it published early on in 2012. Originally I was just going to go the print on demand route mainly because I then have more control over my own work. However over the last few days I've been thinking that perhaps I might try and have it published "normally".
I would just like to ask your opinions on a certain matter. The book is not a single story but rather, a collection of five stories. They are all standalone and the only thing they share in common is being based in the same fictional world.
The thing is I often think that some stories simply don't need to be novels. I often come across people struggling to write and discover that all they're really doing is desperately trying to make it longer because they have this idea that somehow the longer the story, the better it is which is of course silly.
Now when I was planning to go the print on demand route this was no issue because I can do whatever I like. I'm just curious how people, and therefore a publisher, would view my book idea. My reasoning for having several seperate stories in a single book is that I personally enjoy reading shorter stories and I've always enjoyed short story (or novella) collections far more than novels. I also think that in a time when people are busier than ever, it's just far more convienient. What I want to ask you is whether you think a publisher would think the same way and if you yourselves would buy such a book. Would the fact it's a collection of shorter stories make you want to buy it more, or put you off? Indifferent?
I'm just trying to gauge how people might respond generally.
Over the last few weeks I've been working on a book with the intention of having it published early on in 2012. Originally I was just going to go the print on demand route mainly because I then have more control over my own work. However over the last few days I've been thinking that perhaps I might try and have it published "normally".
I would just like to ask your opinions on a certain matter. The book is not a single story but rather, a collection of five stories. They are all standalone and the only thing they share in common is being based in the same fictional world.
The thing is I often think that some stories simply don't need to be novels. I often come across people struggling to write and discover that all they're really doing is desperately trying to make it longer because they have this idea that somehow the longer the story, the better it is which is of course silly.
Now when I was planning to go the print on demand route this was no issue because I can do whatever I like. I'm just curious how people, and therefore a publisher, would view my book idea. My reasoning for having several seperate stories in a single book is that I personally enjoy reading shorter stories and I've always enjoyed short story (or novella) collections far more than novels. I also think that in a time when people are busier than ever, it's just far more convienient. What I want to ask you is whether you think a publisher would think the same way and if you yourselves would buy such a book. Would the fact it's a collection of shorter stories make you want to buy it more, or put you off? Indifferent?
I'm just trying to gauge how people might respond generally.