Wow. I didn't think the media's 'I'll tell you what to want, think and do' line could get any more unsubtle.
If I had a young daughter I would not want to give her a game which tells her the most important things are her looks and how much her bf makes.Satsuki666 said:1) Because its the kind of thing that a lot of twelve year old girls want to play.Sizzle Montyjing said:Disscussion value/ question:
Why in the world do people still make games like this?
What are your responses?
What possible effect to you think this game could have?
2) Dont care since I am not twelve and its not targeted at me.
3) None. It is just another game in a sea of very similar ones that have been coming out for years and years. I can remember seeing things like this ten years ago so its not going to suddenly change things now.
Most of the stay-at-home moms I know don't HAVE any spare time. Taking care of young kids is basically a full-time job, along with all the other things "homemakers" are supposed to do.MercurySteam said:I seriously can't stop laughing. At least it will give stay-at-home-mums something to do in their spare time.
I work at an elementary school. Kids, more precisely little girls, are playing such games.Sizzle Montyjing said:Why in the world do people still make games like this?
What possible effect to you think this game could have?
Quoted because this actually raises a very good point. If we want to argue that violent games are fine because people can tell the difference between game and reality, then we also have to accept that the same rules apply for this game. It can't go both ways.JesterRaiin said:I don't think that for normal kids there's any impact at all - exactly like with any other kind of games.Sizzle Montyjing said:What possible effect to you think this game could have?![]()
Build a shed.Wuggy said:- Lift weights
- Get a tan
- Drink beer
- Watch Football
- Beat up some geeks
- Urinate in a public place.
Frankly, it's just too amusing.xXxJessicaxXx said:I'm shocked more of you male escapists aren't completely offended by the boyfriend part tbh.
I'm not sure this seems a different sort of offensive. Like you wouldn't have a game that featured racism (outside of a period scenario) so why this blatant sexism? The boyfriend part is sexism against males if anything. It's awful.b3nn3tt said:Quoted because this actually raises a very good point. If we want to argue that violent games are fine because people can tell the difference between game and reality, then we also have to accept that the same rules apply for this game. It can't go both ways.JesterRaiin said:I don't think that for normal kids there's any impact at all - exactly like with any other kind of games.Sizzle Montyjing said:What possible effect to you think this game could have?![]()
OT: Well, I certainly won't be playing it, but then I seriously doubt that it's aimed at me anyway. It looks pretty bad, but if that's what people want to play then I say go for it, each to their own and all that.
Use Old Spice body wash and watch My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic would also be there as well of course. Wait...Wuggy said:I glossed over it (I'm at work, can't really go in-depth right now) and I demand equality! We need a game for boys!
Some of the objectives would include:
- Lift weights
- Get a tan
- Drink beer
- Watch Football
- Beat up some geeks
- Urinate in a public place
And much, much more!
Because that's just as accurate to what "guys" do as a collective (because you can generalize an entire gender to have same interests, right?) as this 'game for girls'.
I'll agree with you that it look absolutely terrible, and I'd say sexist towards both men and women. But I think that makes it a bad game, I don't think it necessarily means that players are going to take messages from it and carry them over into real life.xXxJessicaxXx said:I'm not sure this seems a different sort of offensive. Like you wouldn't have a game that featured racism (outside of a period scenario) so why this blatant sexism? The boyfriend part is sexism against males if anything. It's awful.b3nn3tt said:Quoted because this actually raises a very good point. If we want to argue that violent games are fine because people can tell the difference between game and reality, then we also have to accept that the same rules apply for this game. It can't go both ways.JesterRaiin said:I don't think that for normal kids there's any impact at all - exactly like with any other kind of games.Sizzle Montyjing said:What possible effect to you think this game could have?![]()
OT: Well, I certainly won't be playing it, but then I seriously doubt that it's aimed at me anyway. It looks pretty bad, but if that's what people want to play then I say go for it, each to their own and all that.
Ah - but most games featuring violence (at least COD or other shooters, probably not fighting games ala Tekken) will not fall into the hands of most kids until they're 10-12.b3nn3tt said:Quoted because this actually raises a very good point. If we want to argue that violent games are fine because people can tell the difference between game and reality, then we also have to accept that the same rules apply for this game. It can't go both ways.
This is my favourite thing since the "reproductive organs on the inside instead of the outside" line from Stargate....see what it takes for the unpenised to make it today.