Yes, The Sims. The almost equally shallow and materialistic game that eschews the pretense of gender roles by making all characters equally interchangeable in nearly every game scenario, and accomplishes the game designer's (ideally) primary objective of being universally recognized as a "good game" (and therefore make the most money). A game that has at least some appeal to both sides of the "gender divide" with just enough meaningful depth to avoid becoming vapid, and allows either gender to explore those different sides of appeal through their own filter without having to sacrifice what made the game interesting in the first place.Falseprophet said:You mean the game that teaches you that the path to a happy and fulfilled life is owning more and more expensive possessions?2xDouble said:Great...
Thankfully, most women I know would rather play The Sims.
But in its defense, at least that's an accurate depiction of middle-class life...or at least the life all advertisers are trying to sell to us.
Extra Credits said:Perhaps the ideal solution would be to stop drawing gender lines completely. It may be that when we stop thinking so much about "games for men" and "games for women" and just make games for people, things will start to improve.
I think that's when someone with a brain finally came up and said "This was supposed to be a fun game for women, you stupid morons! Put some actual objective there, other than getting a boyfriend based on his money, buying shit, or changing your hair!"Pinkamena said:This can't be serious. What were the developers smoking when they decided to add a witch into this game?!
The evil witch has been hiding the Ghost city for centuries and no one has succeeded in breaking the spell yet. With every passing year, and with each of the thousands of unsuccessful attempts to break the spell, the witch becomes stronger and is now more powerful than before.
Oh, but it does. Note the Cookiegirl training course. It's not quite kitchen-filled, but it's still there.usmarine4160 said:How can a game for girls not include training in the kitchen?
Of course they won't, just like little boys (and girls) don't go around shooting people because they did it in a game. Please stop feeding the Fox.Astoria said:This is hilarious and sad at the same time. Hilarious because it is just so stupid. Sad because it is clearly aimed at younger girls who will take it to heart and believe this is how girls really act.
OH SNAP!usmarine4160 said:How can a game for girls not include training in the kitchen?
Sorry, but what is everyone's problem with Kotaku?Aprilgold said:Its Kotaku nerd bating again, just leave them alone while they become the Blog of 4chan.
You can read several of their articles and they promote PREPOSTEROUS things. This is a smaller one, but I do have one to use.Sizzle Montyjing said:Sorry, but what is everyone's problem with Kotaku?Aprilgold said:Its Kotaku nerd bating again, just leave them alone while they become the Blog of 4chan.
I've only ever been on it once and people seem to get really riled against it...
GAH YES. dammit i knew there was a kitchen joke in there somewhere..usmarine4160 said:How can a game for girls not include training in the kitchen?
ha jesus you just never let a single post go without bashing bioware, do you?Axolotl said:So in order to appeal to females a game needs to revolve the collection of worthless currency (which you use to get more money), have you explore a banal world, emphasising vapid relationships, constanly require changing between indistiguisable clothes, all so you can arbitary leveling to allow you defeat some nonseneical, shoe-horned in fantasy antagonist? Well at least it explains why Bioware has so many female fans I guess.