Fire Emblem - The GBA Trilogy.

Recommended Videos

EscapeGoat_v1legacy

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,788
0
0
[sub]Here we go - a DemonGuy792 retrospective review. I wrote this because I decided that I'd try and make a resolution to myself, and try and write reviews on a vaguely ordered schedule once I'd Gone Gonzo. It also seems to have become somewhat traditional for a non-reviewer to write a review at various post milestones, and I'm nothing if not a stickler for traditions (or pseudo-traditions, as the case may be). Hope you enjoy reading this.[/sub]

Fire Emblem is a game series, and quite an old well-established one, having started on the Famicom and, as of now, has games on both of Nintendo's current gen consoles, the DS and Wii. I say Famicom, rather than NES, because its more appropriate, I think, since the series has been a Japanese exclusive, right up until the 7th game to be published, Fire Emblem: Rekka no Ken, which roughly translates as Blazing Sword, although it was simply known as Fire Emblem outside of Japan.

The Game Boy Advance was not exempt from its share of Fire Emblem games; indeed, three were released for the Game Boy Advance, the joint most for any Nintendo console, sharing its place with the Super Famicom. These three games are the ones I shall be reviewing, and consist of the Japanese-only Fire Emblem: Fuuin no Tsurugi, the first Fire Emblem game to be released outside of Japan, Fire Emblem: Rekka no Ken and the first game to incorporate a freely-navigable World Map and multiple promotion trees for characters, Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones, because, quite frankly, if you review one, you've reviewed them all.

Hi, I'm the Middle Child.

The gameplay of Fire Emblem has remained fairly consistent over the years that the series has been running (that's 19 years now), and all three of these games are no exceptions - the games sit quite neatly in the Turn-Based Strategy RPG genre, along with the rest of the series. The basic premise is that you and your army are placed on a map that is all squared off, with various enemies in the way and an overall goal presented to you. In Fuuin no Tsurugi, the goal never differs from "Sieze the Keep", whereas Rekka no Ken and The Sacred Stones both feature alternative goals, like "Defeat the Boss" and "Survive for x amount of turns", which helps keep the games interesting by keeping players on their toes, since each goal requires a different strategy.

The units open to the player are quite extensive. The game is set during a fantasy-medieval time period, and the classes reflect that. Most characters start off with a 1st tier class; these include the Myrmidon (an assassin type character with a high critical hit ratio), the Thief, the Cavalier (Social Knight in the Japanese games), the Fighter, the Mage, the Shaman and the Cleric, as well as many more, and each class can upgrade, once certain parameters have been met, with the 2nd Tier classes often being much more refined, such as the Swordmaster, Druid, Bishop, Rogue, Hero or Dragon Master. The main protagonists of each game are all Lords, but can upgrade into their own unique class as well, with most of them being an upgrade of the weaponry the Lords use, such as Blade Lord, Knight Lord and Axe Lord.

Another part of the tactics in Fire Emblem is the Weapons Triangle, of which there are two. All weapons will fall into a category, which are lances, swords, axes, bows, Anima, Light, Dark and Staves. The first Triangle states that during battle, a unit with a lance will gain a boost against a unit with a sword, a sword user will have the advantage against an axe wielder and an axe wielder will beat a lance user. Similarly, the Magic Triangle says that Anima magic, such as Fire and Thunder, is effective against users of Light Magic, Light Magic is good against Dark Magic and Dark Magic beats Anima. The two weapons exempt from this are bows, which do extra damage against Flying units, such as Pegasi Knights, and Staves, which cast various effects such as Heal, but stops the user attacking in combat. This adds an extra degree of thought when it comes to making moves, as you may attack a sword wielding enemy with a lance-wielding Knight, only to have that unit charged by enemy Warriors armed with axes.

The main part of the challenge of the Fire Emblem games is when your units finally bite the bullet and die, and this is what sets Fire Emblem apart from other RPGs - there is no way to revive your characters. Quite literally, if a character dies, they stay dead, which means you have to exercise extreme caution when moving your units. All three of these games do offer more than one unit in each promotion tree, but if one dies, then you're usually faced with the prospect of having to train another, and, because the game uses an auto-save system, you can't just reset the battle, since it'll restart with the death of your character. In fact, the only way to get around it is to restart the entire Chapter. Similarly, every weapon has a durability number that decreases with each use of the weapon. Once that runs down, the weapon breaks and the unit is rendered unable to attack.

What do you mean, you forgot to bring the Life spell?!

The plot of the three games is another part of the games where they all resemble each other. The basic plot of the three games can be summed up as one nation is at war with another, causing the main character(s) - Roy in Fuuin no Tsurugi, Lyn, Eliwood and Hector in Rekka no Ken and Eirika and Ephraim in The Sacred Stones - to go on a quest to stop them, and are assisted by a wide variety of characters in their quest. Sometimes the main villain is another country's leader, sometimes its a demon, but the plot has very little variety in terms of the main storyline. However, it's presented fairly well, with text-based conversations before and after the Chapter, with some in the middle as well, as some enemies will take time out of fighting to banter with their attacker, while units who spend a set number of turns near each other can engage in Support conversations, which increases their stats when they're near each other, as well as revealing snippets of the character's history, or their thoughts on other characters. However, as I said before, the plot's pretty much the same, with only some minor differences for each game, so if you're looking for an original story and you've already played one of these, then be wary.

Don't let it concern you. I often end plot-based exposition in the middle of.

Graphically, the game is quite pretty, as far as sprites can be called pretty. There's plenty of colour splashed around, which is nice to see, although there's only a small number of tiles used for each map, but it doesn't detract from the visual spectacle. The characters are also nicely designed, although I couldn't help noticing that, as an RPG, some characters had wildly coloured hair, if not wildly designed, but that's alright, it helped make some of the character's memorable.

The attacks are also beautiful - specifically, the magic attacks, which mostly consist of sparks of various colours splashing around the screen, and it makes it all the more upsetting when they finally run out and you have to resort to less impressive attacks.

Still, its not without its problems. The main problem is, just like everything else, it never changes. From Fuuin no Tsurugi to Sacred Stones, there's no graphical upgrades at all. Everything is reused - every sprite, every attack, every animation, every background - and there's just nothing new. While its all fine and dandy that the game looks good, I'd expect a game released 2 to 3 years after the first in the series to have some updates.

I cast Diamon Dust...err...I mean, Fimbulvetr! Yeah...

In terms of sounds, the game could do better, I feel. While I've nothing against the synthesized music present in the games, with grand stories and epic quests, I think that synthesized notes don't really do the game justice. Similarly, the tinny "bleepedy bleep" of the text as it scrolls across the screen tends to gets grating after the first hour or so, and each game is fairly verbose, so you'll be hearing it a lot. Still, I understand the limitations of a Game Boy Advance game, but still...I've got to find something solid to complain about, really, and there hasn't been much up to now to moan about.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Bottom Line - Is it Fun and should I Buy It/Them?

First of all, yes, all three of these games are fun. To the casual gamer, they're a great way to kill, say a train journey, and then put down for the return home, while a more serious gamer could spend ages carefully planning a strategy to get them through the game with no casualities, which is possible, as well as getting all of the Support Conversations and, therefore, all of the possible endings for each character.

However, the main problem in these games lies in the fact that they're all too similar to warrant buying all three. It really is a case of played one, played them all, I found, since there's only ever minor adjustments to each subsequent game, which gives the final game, The Sacred Stones, a feeling that your playing Fire Emblem Version 1.3, rather than an all-new game.

So, the bottom line - buy, rent or miss? Let's do this for each game.

Fire Emblem: Fuuin no Tsurugi. This is easily the biggest challenge of the three, what with having the weakest Lord, the hardest bosses and being all in Japanese. Now, I can read Japanese, so I managed to struggle through the game fairly well, but, unless you can read it or you fancy reading a fan-translation as you're going along, then I'd avoid it, but not because it's a bad game. It's just too hard to get a copy and it's all in Japanese.

Fire Emblem: Rekka no Ken - [sub]Also known as Fire Emblem in non-Japanese speaking areas[/sub]. This game, much like the previous title, is a challenge, but less so, since you can choose from three Lords, all of whom are good, and it is has the added bonus of being in English. If you're a Fire Emblem or Turn-Based Strategy veteran, then I'd Buy This One, as it's more of a challenge than the following game while still being fun.

Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones. This game would be the one I'd recommend to beginners, either in the Fire Emblem series or in the entire Turn-Based Strategy genre. The multiple promotion trees allow for a large amount of strategic planning and choice, while the freely navigable world map means you can easily replenish supplies should they start to get low, as well as fighting Skirmishes to raise your characters Levels. Therefore, if you're new to Fire Emblem, Get This One.

Thank you for reading; any and all comments would be appreciated.

DemonGuy792
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
I've only played the second two so I agree with your analysis of those two. While I liked the slighty added customization of the third, I favored the characters and storyline of the second, which puts it over the third for me.
 

EscapeGoat_v1legacy

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,788
0
0
NoMoreSanity said:
The original GBA Fire Emblem was a favorite of mine as a kid, and Sacred Stones is my choice for best of the series. Good review.
Thanks. Personally, while I enjoyed all three of the games, I suppose my favourite was Rekka no Ken, which was simply called Fire Emblem when it was released outside of Japan - I just found it easier to refer to it using the Japanese subtitle to avoid confusion. Still, I enjoyed The Sacred Stones a lot, but it was just the fact that I felt like I was playing an upgrade, rather than a new game, was what, well, annoyed me, to be quite frank.

hortez the champion of the frozen wastes said:
I dunno I've never really gotten into turn based strategy.

Maybe I'll check it out.
I'd certainly recommend trying the Fire Emblem games - any of them - as an introduction to Turn-Based Strategy games, especially since they're a good challenge, as well as being fairly unique.

Awexsome said:
I've only played the second two so I agree with your analysis of those two. While I liked the slighty added customization of the third, I favored the characters and storyline of the second, which puts it over the third for me.
Agreed, I preferred Rekka no Ken over The Sacred Stones as well. Oh, and don't think you've missed much by not having played Fuuin no Tsurugi - it's fairly similar to the other two, but with a single, much weaker Lord character, only one objective in each Chapter and many, many more playable units up for grabs.
 

Yegargeburble

New member
Nov 11, 2008
1,058
0
0
I have had the good fortune to be able to play all 3, and I must say that this review is spot on.

However, I would recommend getting all three. Even if they are very similar, they do have different and interesting people, especially the big bad guys, as they all have different motivations for invasions, etc.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,312
0
0
An interesting point you missed was that in 6 and 7 since there was a limited number of battles experience was a commodity and you could not level grind to overpower everything adding another strategic element.

sirbryghtside said:
Fire Emblem sounds cool - I've only heard of it from Super Smash Bros.

Is there a game of it for the Wii?
Yes but it is the hardest American release one and its difficulty will make newcomers cry tears of blood and hate the series forever. For series vets it is the best though.

The DS version is dumbed down and far too easy. It also rewards incompetence which I disapprove of as I enjoy recruiting everyone and keeping everyone alive. They also ruined the lovable sprite art in the non-GBA versions.
 

Radeonx

New member
Apr 26, 2009
7,013
0
0
sirbryghtside said:
Fire Emblem sounds cool - I've only heard of it from Super Smash Bros.

Is there a game of it for the Wii?
Yes, but the GBA versions are much better.
Nice review. I loved the 3 fire emblem games for GBA, and I even had to give a certain amount of liking to the DS version of Marth's game, for the sheer fact that it had Marth.
 

EscapeGoat_v1legacy

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,788
0
0
sirbryghtside said:
Fire Emblem sounds cool - I've only heard of it from Super Smash Bros.

Is there a game of it for the Wii?
I'm aware that people have already commented on this, but let me share a little bit more enlightenment with you.

There have been Fire Emblem games for the Famicom, Super Famicom, GBA, GameCube, DS and Wii, although, if you're a newcomer, I'd recommend either The Sacred Stones for the GBA, or the DS game, which I don't own, but have played, and, I must say, I found it ridiculously easy, although I am a veteran of the series.

Also, if you've played Super Smash Bros. Melee and unlocked most of the characters, then you'll probably have already met Roy - he's the protagonist of Fuuin no Tsurugi, the first GBA Fire Emblem, although it was one that was only released in Japan.

Yegargeburble said:
I have had the good fortune to be able to play all 3, and I must say that this review is spot on.

However, I would recommend getting all three. Even if they are very similar, they do have different and interesting people, especially the big bad guys, as they all have different motivations for invasions, etc.
Thank you. Personally, as I said, I love all three, but wouldn't recommend Fuuin no Tsurugi as a buy due to the fact that it's all in Japanese. However, if you can read it, or have a translation handy, and you're looking for a challenge, even in terms of Fire Emblem, then yes, I'd recommend it then.

Tenmar said:
Actually yes there is a Fire Emblem game for the wii. Fire Emblem:Radient Dawn is actually a sequel from the Gamecube Fire Emblem having Ike as the main character. Still haven't gotten around to beating it but like the review says you played one fire emblem you played em all. Still worth trying if you like turn based strategy. A great challenge with a good learning curve.
I wouldn't say that if you've played one Fire Emblem you've played them all - I was referring to the GBA games only, really. While there are a lot of similarities between each of the Fire Emblem games - well, it is a series - I found that there were enough differences between the different console versions to keep me hooked.

Souplex said:
An interesting point you missed was that in 6 and 7 since there was a limited number of battles experience was a commodity and you could not level grind to overpower everything adding another strategic element.

Yes but it is the hardest American release one and its difficulty will make newcomers cry tears of blood and hate the series forever. For series vets it is the best though.

The DS version is dumbed down and far too easy. It also rewards incompetence which I disapprove of as I enjoy recruiting everyone and keeping everyone alive. They also ruined the lovable sprite art in the non-GBA versions.
That is a good point and thank you for pointing it out to me - I'd overlooked the fact that you can only go forwards with Fuuin no Tsurugi and Rekka no Ken, so experience is a commodity.

Also, I would, personally, say that, while Radiant Dawn is a good entry to the series, it isn't the best - for me, that's stuck between Rekka no Ken and The Sacred Stones, which is why I chose the review the GBA games.

Radeonx said:
Yes, but the GBA versions are much better.
Nice review. I loved the 3 fire emblem games for GBA, and I even had to give a certain amount of liking to the DS version of Marth's game, for the sheer fact that it had Marth.
Thank you, and I'd agree on the GBA entries being better. I'd also agree that the DS version was good, if a little too easy, and I'm not too fussed about Marth - somehow, he never manages to pull off the charisma that, say, Eliwood, or Ephraim had. Still, that's just me.

Thank you all for your comments. The quotes here have been spoilered for the sake of keeping this post from taking up a giant amount of space, since I like to quote and reply to everyone who's spared the time to comment on my reviews.
 

KickerCutleg

New member
Nov 2, 2008
28
0
0
I must say, this is quite a good review, MUCH better than mine, at any rate XD
I would give more thought to the actual gameplay itself though, less how wordy it is, more WHY the words are annoying, or why aren't they.
 

Mr. Fister

New member
Jun 21, 2008
1,335
0
0
Souplex said:
The DS version is dumbed down and far too easy. It also rewards incompetence which I disapprove of as I enjoy recruiting everyone and keeping everyone alive. They also ruined the lovable sprite art in the non-GBA versions.
I disagree on the DS version (Shadow Dragon) being too easy. I played through both it and Path of Radiance on the easiest difficulty available. In Shadow Dragon, I lost 7 units in my campaign. In Path of Radiance, I lost 0. That could be due to SD being the first Fire Emblem game I ever played, but even then, I was being cautious with everybody. I think the reason it's dumbed down (going from SD to PoR made it obvious) is because it's a remake of the very first Fire Emblem from the Famicom. My guess is they just updated the graphics and audio while keeping the original depth when they made it.

On-topic, good review. The Fire Emblem series is one of Nintendo's better series that gets overlooked by both fans and haters due to its larger franchises. If you're able to look past its flaws and fairly low production values (especially the console versions), you'll find a challenging and rewarding experience in each of them.
 

EscapeGoat_v1legacy

New member
Aug 20, 2008
2,788
0
0
KickerCutleg said:
I must say, this is quite a good review, MUCH better than mine, at any rate XD
I would give more thought to the actual gameplay itself though, less how wordy it is, more WHY the words are annoying, or why aren't they.
Thanks, I'll bear that in mind. I suppose that the main problem is that the game's dialogue is somewhat convoluted, and, in some cases, seems to be explained at arbitrary moments, while some characters come off as shallow and plain, which is shows through their speech.

IdealistCommi said:
I got the first Fire EMblem for the GBA when I was a kid, and It instaly turned me into a fan. Great review, too. :D
Thank you. Techinically, I'm guessing that it was the second Fire Emblem, Rekka no Ken, which was the first GBA game released in non-Japanese speaking countries, but that's of no consequence. Glad you liked the review.

Mr. Fister said:
On-topic, good review. The Fire Emblem series is one of Nintendo's better series that gets overlooked by both fans and haters due to its larger franchises. If you're able to look past its flaws and fairly low production values (especially the console versions), you'll find a challenging and rewarding experience in each of them.
Thank you, and yes, I agree that is often overlooked, although the inclusion of Marth, Roy and Ike in the Super Smash Bros. franchise certainly gave it some sort of boost.