I said more fun and I used that wording for a reason and to you have to remember the flash games I'm referring only have about five minutes of content so getting to a half hour is like replaying a level 6 times back to back.Trolldor said:Flash games are not better than AAA titles.lord.jeff said:Okay I was just playing a flash game more specifically Flood Runner 3 [http://www.kongregate.com/games/benrad/flood-runner-3] and I probably restarted the game about a dozen times because I was having fun each time, and then I started wondering if their were any console games that had sections in them that I would enjoy replaying a dozen times back to back. And truthfully I don't think a know any game level/boss that would be able to hold my attention for more then three or so times if I played it repeatedly.
I guess what I'm wondering is does anyone think that flash games are more fun then console games?
and if anyone can think of a game level they would happily replay a dozen times in one sitting?
It's not that they couldn't be, it's that they simply just aren't. Games worse than flash games are the anomaly.
Why?
Because very rarely do you play a game so intolerable that you'll spend less than half an hour on it, and spending half an hour on a flash games is edging towards near flash-brilliance.
I think that's what makes them so fun, but to each they're own.RedEyesBlackGamer said:Not to me. Call me elitist, but the games are too simplistic for me (for the most part).
Also thanks for the recommendations from everyone who gave one.