FortressCraft Q&A (for those who still think it's a blatant rip-off)

Recommended Videos

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Irridium said:
How do we know that FortressCraft is just a rip-off though? Has anyone here played it? Has anyone played with the mechanics and all that? No, nobody but the creators have.

So dismissing it as a rip-off before its released and we've gotten a chance to try it is just stupid. To my knowledge nobody did that with Minecraft, so who should this be any different?

Is it because Minecraft is still being worked on? Who knows, maybe it'll inspire some competition between the two and we, the customers, get 2 great products out of it.

Who knows, maybe I'll actually stick with FortressCraft for more then 2 weeks before I stop playing it because its boring.
Maybe we will get two great rival games out of it, but ive proven myself good at identifying game mechanics from pictures alone. This happens to be one thats hits a nerve.

Not saying im always right. Im merely right most of the time.
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
Irridium said:
In that case, Minecraft is just a rip-off of infiniminer.
As far as i'm aware, Infiniminer was never actually completed. Minecraft may be in beta, but it's extremely evident that it's going to be finished and released as a full product in the not too distant future and the amount of popularity and general success is blindingly obvious. This is why what Fortresscraft is doing is wrong as opposed to what Notch did with Minecraft and Infiniminer. That's how i see it, anyway.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
gigastar said:
Irridium said:
How do we know that FortressCraft is just a rip-off though? Has anyone here played it? Has anyone played with the mechanics and all that? No, nobody but the creators have.

So dismissing it as a rip-off before its released and we've gotten a chance to try it is just stupid. To my knowledge nobody did that with Minecraft, so who should this be any different?

Is it because Minecraft is still being worked on? Who knows, maybe it'll inspire some competition between the two and we, the customers, get 2 great products out of it.

Who knows, maybe I'll actually stick with FortressCraft for more then 2 weeks before I stop playing it because its boring.
Maybe we will get two great rival games out of it, but ive proven myself good at identifying game mechanics from pictures alone. This happens to be one thats hits a nerve.

Not saying im always right. Im merely right most of the time.
Well good for you. I'm just sick of everyone outright dismissing it as a rip-off. Especially when I criticize other games before they're released, I get verbally *****-slapped by people because I'm "judging it before I played it" or some bullshit like that. Its shit like this that really pisses me off, and I wish people would start being fucking consistent with this crap.

Sorry, ranted a little there. Just fired up.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Gralian said:
Irridium said:
In that case, Minecraft is just a rip-off of infiniminer.
As far as i'm aware, Infiniminer was never actually completed. Minecraft may be in beta, but it's extremely evident that it's going to be finished and released as a full product in the not too distant future and the amount of popularity and general success is blindingly obvious. This is why what Fortresscraft is doing is wrong as opposed to what Notch did with Minecraft and Infiniminer. That's how i see it, anyway.
Still, maybe FortressCraft will be better then Minecraft. We don't know. Sure it looks the same, but maybe its actually better, and provides more direction then just "build". Which gets boring for me after a week or two.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Irridium said:
Sorry, ranted a little there. Just fired up.
I know how you feel and its ok, i dont hold grudges against people on the net.
 

Gralian

Me, I'm Counting
Sep 24, 2008
1,789
0
0
Irridium said:
Still, maybe FortressCraft will be better then Minecraft. We don't know. Sure it looks the same, but maybe its actually better, and provides more direction then just "build". Which gets boring for me after a week or two.
I can appreciate that sentiment. In fact, i understand that it may even give Notch a little bit of competition to help him improve his product further. It's just difficult to look at Fortresscraft with an optimistic view when the principle of what the creator is doing is fairly offensive and arguably shameless to a lot of people, especially the majority of the fans of the genre(?). Even the name "Fortresscraft" is like a slap in the face to the game that inspired it. It'd be like somebody cloning Call of Duty and using Epic's spoof title, "Duty Calls". People would be pissed off. You can't make the "inspiration" THAT obvious. There ought to be a little bit more originality, even if it is an indie title. I can see there is potential for it, but the way it's being handled now is like running into an airport terminal and yelling the word 'bomb' just to get attention.
 

Ghengis John

New member
Dec 16, 2007
2,209
0
0
Hardcore_gamer said:
Infiniminer isn't even about building stuff, it a game that was canceled after only 1 month in development and was suppose to be a online multiplayer game where players try to gather more resources from mines then the other team via digging and searching, building stuff wasn't even suppose to be a part of the game, but many people decided to to so anyways because they thought the main game was boring.
Actually it had a "Freeplay mode" Which was all about building stuff. You lose. Thanks for playing. Yes a duck and a goose are both birds. A keen observation. Mine craft and infiniminer are not birds. You lose again. It must suck being wrong ALL the time. How do you manage?

For the record we agree, they are not the same. One was clearly inspired by another and therefor not original. (Not talking bout the duck and goose here, even if geese are blatant plagiarists) Notch admits this himself (even if you can't), but most people have never even SEEN infiniminer. You said it yourself, 90% of people know jack shit about it. That doesn't mean it never happened.

It's clear from your responses in this thread though that the most obvious thing that's hardcore about you is your frothing, rabid fanboyism. So I expect this post to be met with something resembling a small dog barking.
 

internetzealot1

New member
Aug 11, 2009
1,693
0
0
Binerexis said:
Minecraft is already part of a genre; it's an open world sandbox game.
I think the fact that the world is randomly generated each time is enough to push it into a new genre. I'd call it more of an exploration game, because you can keep exploring indefinitely (which hardly any other 3D first-person game allows you to do).
 

thenoblitt

New member
May 7, 2009
759
0
0
there is a difference between using it as a source and blatant rip off and every single gameplay video i've seen there is literally no difference in gameplay and the only real difference is better graphics, yo still mine blocks which are relatively the same size you still use these block to build stuff you use the blocks to make materials its still the same damn things, its not like they added a narrative or a setting or anything
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Hardcore_gamer said:
Irridium said:
gigastar said:
Irridium said:
How do we know that FortressCraft is just a rip-off though? Has anyone here played it? Has anyone played with the mechanics and all that? No, nobody but the creators have.

So dismissing it as a rip-off before its released and we've gotten a chance to try it is just stupid. To my knowledge nobody did that with Minecraft, so who should this be any different?

Is it because Minecraft is still being worked on? Who knows, maybe it'll inspire some competition between the two and we, the customers, get 2 great products out of it.

Who knows, maybe I'll actually stick with FortressCraft for more then 2 weeks before I stop playing it because its boring.
Maybe we will get two great rival games out of it, but ive proven myself good at identifying game mechanics from pictures alone. This happens to be one thats hits a nerve.

Not saying im always right. Im merely right most of the time.
Well good for you. I'm just sick of everyone outright dismissing it as a rip-off. Especially when I criticize other games before they're released, I get verbally *****-slapped by people because I'm "judging it before I played it" or some bullshit like that. Its shit like this that really pisses me off, and I wish people would start being fucking consistent with this crap.

Sorry, ranted a little there. Just fired up.
Except that here they have every reason to call it a rip-off, because it genuinely looks like one.
Battlefield 3 looks like any other generic shooter(seriously, if nobody said it was Battlefield 3 I would have assumed it was the next Medal of Honor). Fallout 3 looks like brown ass. Team Fortress 2 looks like a light-hearted "casual" game. Maximo looks cartoon-y and easy.

Point is, looks aren't everything. Battlefield 3 seems to be highly anticipated. Fallout 3 is considered a fantastic game. And Team Fortress 2 is one of the most loved PC games by the "hardcore" crowd. And Maximo is fucking insanely hard. I just think that people should wait to play until they cast such hard judgement. From the looks of the chapters, it seems it has quite a bit of stuff that Minecraft doesn't have. And again, with both of these existing, they could build off each other, making better products, which is good for everyone.
 

thethain

New member
Jul 23, 2010
113
0
0
Two points.

1. The game is a rip off, copy, attempt to cash in, etc. If it were not, it would not have to fight so adamantly to attempt to defend itself. Also it would not be attempting to release a game so very similar to a somewhat unique game in such a short time frame.

2. Being a clone doesn't mean it will be a bad game. There are times in which the shadow can eclipse the caster. But to get there from here.. Is a long way.

Honestly what I hope is that the game does well and adds variety and unique aspects, and can spur Minecraft to greater things as well. Don't think that GTA4 did not benefit from seeing what the half dozen clones of GTA3 did well, and did not so well.
 

Amondren

New member
Oct 15, 2009
826
0
0
This is minecraft no matter how you look at it its blocky you place blocks and their will be enemys this is just minecraft with bad avatars (for this game at least because it doesnt fit in.)
 

Ghengis John

New member
Dec 16, 2007
2,209
0
0
thethain said:
Honestly what I hope is that the game does well and adds variety and unique aspects, and can spur Minecraft to greater things as well. Don't think that GTA4 did not benefit from seeing what the half dozen clones of GTA3 did well, and did not so well.
An excellent point.
 

Defense

New member
Oct 20, 2010
870
0
0
Everyone builds up from an already existing idea. This isn't a completely new concept that came with the game industry, it existed for a long time. Grow up everyone.
 

Booze Zombie

New member
Dec 8, 2007
7,416
0
0
I think I'll wait until the guy actually releases the game to offer my "oh so important" judgement.

That said, I'm sick of everyone yelling "rip-off". Minecraft was a copy/paste of Infiniminer until Notch tweaked it to the point that you wouldn't know, because it changed so much.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Just because they've added some stuff and used different graphics doesn't make it less of a blatant copy.

That's not a bad thing (people with consoles should be able to play as well), but don't try to pretend it's not a blatant copy. A cube-based building game where you can do whatever you want and build items such as bookshelves, released six months after Minecraft starts to gain massive popularity? Yeah, that's not "original" in any sense.