You said shooter! I love Halo.Onyx Oblivion said:The thing is, most people understand what is implied by "shooter".
When I say shooter, only five people on this site think of Ikaruga.
You said shooter! I love Halo.Onyx Oblivion said:The thing is, most people understand what is implied by "shooter".
When I say shooter, only five people on this site think of Ikaruga.
He could at least be more precise and tell us if by writing "halo" he means religious iconography ,a natural phenomenom or a succesful series of *hehe* shooterstanis1lionheart said:I think you'd be taken more seriously if your name wasn't 'Halo Fanboy'.
As opposed to this oh so enlightening PSA?Halo Fanboy said:Keep contributing nothing to anything.The_root_of_all_evil said:But don't you understand? Halo invented proper grammar.Asuka Soryu said:Are we really discussing this? ~.~ This is as stupid as demanding people on the internet use proper grammar. You can't make someone do what you want, just because it's 'incorect'.
You have such a nice way of being arounf people. I bet you're very popular.Halo Fanboy said:I seriously cannot fathom how you can think we don't need to sort Time Crisis and Contra into different genres. Quit talking about games if you can't understand something so obvious.Substance-E said:unnecessary distinctions...
Game genres are defined SOLEY by their mechanics. Besides survival Horror but that's a bad term anyway.David Bray said:Yes i do understand these meanings and you're being very rude simply because your thread did not go your way.Halo Fanboy said:You have no clue what Gun Shooting is (holding a gun-like controller) or Run n Gun (sidescroll shooter with your feet on the ground.)
A game mechanic (i.e. the medium of play) is entirely different from a genre which is the culmination of aesthetic and atmosphere. Please know your terms before you approach threads. And your language. The escapist is a respectable website, not a flame arena.
I don't have anything to say on the subject. I'm not an expert and nothing I say would be valuable.Dublin Solo said:How would you describe JJackson Pollock's art? With only one word?Halo Fanboy said:I seriously cannot fathom how you can think we don't need to sort Time Crisis and Contra into different genres. Quit talking about games if you can't understand something so obvious.Substance-E said:unnecessary distinctions...
Ika-who-what? . . . I think I just unwittingly prooved your point. XDOnyx Oblivion said:The thing is, most people understand what is implied by "shooter".
When I say shooter, only five people on this site think of Ikaruga.
Hey now trance and electro are completely different, that would be like saying metal is the same as rock just because it has guitars in it. Placing songs into genres makes it easier to describe to another what they are like.Substance-E said:Yup, video games need pretentious, horribly complicated nomenclature like the music industry. I mean I feel like a complete ass when I get my trance and electro mixed up....
Ahh, I see. So everybody's ignorant, except you.Halo Fanboy said:I don't have anything to say on the subject. I'm not an expert and nothing I say would be valuable.Dublin Solo said:How would you describe JJackson Pollock's art? With only one word?Halo Fanboy said:I seriously cannot fathom how you can think we don't need to sort Time Crisis and Contra into different genres. Quit talking about games if you can't understand something so obvious.Substance-E said:unnecessary distinctions...
And your attempts to psychoanylize me have lead to the wrong conclusions. I just don't like ignorance.
Son of a...*fixedFetzenfisch said:He could at least be more precise and tell us if by writing "halo" he means religious iconography ,a natural phenomenon or a successful series of *he-he* shooterstanis1lionheart said:I think you'd be taken more seriously if your name wasn't 'Halo Fanboy'.
I'll be honest - I was always more a fan of progressive avantgarde post-punk jazz-metal myself.Socken said:How is this worth making a thread over?
And who needs genres anyway, why do things have to have specific descriptions? All of this nonsense just leads to the confusing pointless bullshit that exists with music right now, like "psychobilly progressive jazz punk" or "symphonic experimental avantgarde post-metal".
I'm like 90% certain that the 'medium' is the video game itself. FPS, RPG, RTS, etc. are all genres within the medium of video games, not the medium themselves.David Bray said:snip
I think, and I could be totally wrong, that this phenomenon has a ton to do with the idea of increasing specificity. 'Shooter' is a very general term for games which involve gun play, but in no way can be an accurate evaluation of a games full content.Halo Fanboy said:snip
Wait, what? Forgetting for now that you're using the newer, narrower definition of "shooter" that the thread is complaining about without even acknowledging the history behind the term, how can you say Arcade Shooters are not competitive? Doom, Quake, Unreal, TF2 and even Halo would like a word with you.Metalhandkerchief said:Who cares, there are two types of shooters:
Tactical ones - by extension competitive ones (CoD 4 on Hardcore for example)
Arcade Shooters - everything from pie tossing to Halo to Timeshit to Haze and all those railshooters. You know, games that are more lightfooted with no sort of real competition tied to them.
Put simply, no they're not. By saying a game's impact is based solely on its mode of play is limiting it to nothing. An FPS can only ever be an FPS. It cannot be a transcendant experience that explores the meaning of being human in war filled attrocity, it becomes merely a game where you shoot things in the first person.Halo Fanboy said:Game genre's are defined SOLEY by their mechanics. Besides survival Horror but that's a bad term anyway.
Games aren't books their genres are never defined by aesthetics and to do so is decadent. And a genre is just a set of conventions it can apply to mechanics aesthetics or whatever. For video games it's obviously the former.
Jesus christ, this has to be the most serious argument of semantics in a long time.Halo Fanboy said:A failure in language usually lead to a failure in logic. Like calling Ninja Gaiden and Diablo "hack and slash", or comparing action adventure like Zelda to real adventure. Even a "puzzle" game like tetris is at least half action. Lets not even get into how misunderstanding of the term RPG lead to the whole genre being pratically whiped from computer gaming.Squilookle said:Welcome to the Escapist!
Meh. If they have things that shoot things, it makes sense to me, so why not?Halo Fanboy said:Do you really want a term that can be used to describe everything from Starfox to DooM to Muchi Muchi Pork? Stick to correct terminology if you don't want to look like an idiot.
I suppose we are going into the realms of sub-mediums and sub-genres but the mode of play is the game. Without mode of play there is no game so the game itself is the FPS, RPG, RTS, etc. which is the medium.jboking said:I'm like 90% certain that the 'medium' is the video game itself. FPS, RPG, RTS, etc. are all genres within the medium of video games, not the medium themselves.David Bray said:snip