I don't care for Anonymous. If you're going to make a stand, grow some balls and do it out in the open. Imagine if everyone during the Equal Rights movement wore masks (besides the bad guys).SecretTacoNinja said:Hahaha... Good on France. And the Anonymous Army.
Well, in the USA the government fears us, but they try to make us fear them at the same time.edinflames said:You can always trust the french to take to the streets and kick up a fuss when the rest of the west can't be arsed.Sylocat said:I have gained new respect for the French.
In France the govt fears the people, in Britain and USA we have it the other way around, worth respecting imo.
And that would be my point. Scientologists are worth something like <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology#Finances> US$500 million and that's all from "revenue". Them charging hundreds and thousands of dollars for their services. They're a company, not a religion.Arbre said:Yes, they have been doing it for that long. Precisely.Radelaide said:That's over hundreds of years!
There is tonnes of differences between Christianity and Scientology. I don't believe in Christianity, but at least there is some theoretical evidence of Christianity's origins.
Actually, there is some factual evidence of Christianity's origins.
We know or estimate how and when it roughly birthed and bloomed.
Now, considering that Scientology is fairly recent, there's technically far more facts about it than about Christianity.
That's probably also why it's less mystic, esoteric in its roots, and doesn't feel like a religion, but a grotesque and pretentious simile that lacks the divine element in it.
There's truth in that. But religion per se doesn't require a god.
Pretty much what Root said. L. Ron Hubbard was a money-making scam artist, good to know his legend lives on!The_root_of_all_evil said:There's factual evidence of Scientology's origins.Arbre said:Actually, there is some factual evidence of Christianity's origins.
"I'd like to start a religion. That's where the money is!" - L.Ron Hubbard (1949)
Yes, every religion has it's flaws, and I'm not denying that. What I'm saying is that religion is meant to bring you closer to your respective God and to your family, not to throw money at it and refuse a relationship with anyone who isn't a part of your religion.There are serious flaws in Scientology and it's beliefs.
Like in any, no? Christianity has come a long way, I suppose, but its fundamentalists are no better than the Scientology's. The difference being that as a mainstream religion which is actually broken down into many variants, there's a lot of moderate faith going on.
A cult, before going large, cannot survive if its core is moderate.
Christianity couldn't survive if its own core was moderate. If it did, if it was watered down, it would not be seen as the strong leading and luminous tower that shines faith all over the world anymore. The former moderates would lose confidence in this current, feel the weakness, and probably shift faith or just drop it all at once.
Of course for me, absolutely all is BS.
Oh sure, the was no secret about it. But it appears that the message, I suppose, has moved on its own beyond its original intent.The_root_of_all_evil said:There's factual evidence of Scientology's origins.Arbre said:Actually, there is some factual evidence of Christianity's origins.
"I'd like to start a religion. That's where the money is!" - L.Ron Hubbard (1949)
And you think Vatican got its money from... the Sky?Radelaide said:And that would be my point. Scientologists are worth something like <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_Scientology#Finances> US$500 million and that's all from "revenue". Them charging hundreds and thousands of dollars for their services. They're a company, not a religion.
Not if the religion doesn't hinge around the premise of a one true God.Radelaide said:Yes, every religion has it's flaws, and I'm not denying that. What I'm saying is that religion is meant to bring you closer to your respective God and to your family, not to throw money at it and refuse a relationship with anyone who isn't a part of your religion.
Even if we are looking at Christianity and Scientology as equals (which is a REAL sleight to Christians), I don't believe that Christianity teaches that for money you can learn powers, specifically indoctrinates the famous, channels illegal funds, preaches that anyone who condemns the religion is to be disgraced or eliminated, targets any reporters who want to know about the religion & ostracises non-members without performing any charitable acts.Arbre said:The point is, the origins are there, but many people treat it as religion now (sigh), and considering the amount of bullshit found in all of religions, I just don't see why this one would have less rights to live, for all its flaws.
I find it highly humourous that in societies of ultra-capitalism and religious bigotry, one of the the less hypocritical models is treated like a witch by some.
![]()
Like I said, these religions are old and mainstream. The larger the people they cover, the more variants and leeway you find. Mind you, considering the stuff Ratsinger sprouts these days, you wonder which one is worst, if his words are the cream of the sanctified stuff, a notch below God.The_root_of_all_evil said:Even if we are looking at Christianity and Scientology as equals (which is a REAL sleight to Christians), I don't believe that Christianity teaches that for money you can learn powers, specifically indoctrinates the famous, channels illegal funds, preaches that anyone who condemns the religion is to be disgraced or eliminated, targets any reporters who want to know about the religion & ostracises non-members without performing any charitable acts.
Last I heard, even an Atheist may sit in on a sermon without being threatened. And that applies to Islam, Buddhism and most other "true" religions, but not Scientology.
Tolerance is a scheme to get ignorant bigots to be quiet without telling them that they are wrong; it is not a coherent general practice that should apply to every belief.M3707ik said:ok im not a scientologist.
But, uh, isnt the whole point of tolarence to not say these kinds of things. I mean any scientologist who saw this relentless stream of bull crap would have left the escapist community.
Oun Crasaunt Le popular falar!The_root_of_all_evil said:Le gâteau est un mensonge!BobisOnlyBob said:Vous avez des mensonges, nous avons le gâteau!
C'est un triomphe, je fais note ici : "succès énorme"Knight Templar said:France is off the list.
I find it odd people are protecting Scientology, it is not their beliefs on trial but their actions. That they belive in doing bad things is a side note.
Oun Crasaunt Le popular falar!The_root_of_all_evil said:Le gâteau est un mensonge!BobisOnlyBob said:Vous avez des mensonges, nous avons le gâteau!
[sup]I have no idea what I just said.[/sup]