Oddly enough, anti-female rhetoric long predates feminism. It's sorta the reason feminism exists.Smithnikov said:Want to know why you're having a hard time lately? Why anti female rhetoric gets so much traction?
Oddly enough, anti-female rhetoric long predates feminism. It's sorta the reason feminism exists.Smithnikov said:Want to know why you're having a hard time lately? Why anti female rhetoric gets so much traction?
Likely someone in administration. Prestigious colleges have a vested interest in appearing problem-free, so admitting there is a rape problem on your campus, even in solidarity, is verboten. It's the same kind of thinking that quietly suspends/expels victims of assault or rape while turning a blind eye to legacies or athletes with star potential.Barbas said:Neither article names the person responsible for allegedly forcing them to remove those banners. Whoever did should apologize and consider resigning from whatever position of authority they hold for the benefit of the university as a whole. It was a stupid decision, seemingly made with little prior thought or human empathy, and if I were a student there I certainly wouldn't want such a person claiming to speak for me.
... I can't believe I had to read this with my own two eyes.Smithnikov said:That said, if this IS true; hey Feminists. Want to know why you're having a hard time lately? Why anti female rhetoric gets so much traction? It could be because you're handing them ammunition like this, especially on college campuses. Something's got to break, folks, because the backlash is just going to get even worse than it is.
Well, NAFALT is now considered a logical fallacy in the manisphere. Yes, it is now a fallacy to NOT assume that feminists are a hive mind.Phasmal said:No one group is a hivemind, and when you start thinking of them that way, you pretty much have nothing valuable to add.
Do you have a different take on it? Info that we missed somewhere?OT: I love how the majority of this thread is- "Well we don't know what exactly happened BUT I'M OUTRAGED AND I BET IT WAS FEMINAZI PC CULTURE".
A different take? I guess. If you don't know what happened, don't get ahead of yourself with outrage. I'm still the kind of person who thinks people are generally reasonable. Perhaps it was an overreaction, perhaps a misunderstanding, perhaps. We don't have enough information about it.Smithnikov said:Do you have a different take on it? Info that we missed somewhere?OT: I love how the majority of this thread is- "Well we don't know what exactly happened BUT I'M OUTRAGED AND I BET IT WAS FEMINAZI PC CULTURE".
I thought the info that was missed was:Smithnikov said:Well, NAFALT is now considered a logical fallacy in the manisphere. Yes, it is now a fallacy to NOT assume that feminists are a hive mind.Phasmal said:No one group is a hivemind, and when you start thinking of them that way, you pretty much have nothing valuable to add.
Do you have a different take on it? Info that we missed somewhere?OT: I love how the majority of this thread is- "Well we don't know what exactly happened BUT I'M OUTRAGED AND I BET IT WAS FEMINAZI PC CULTURE".
I'm sorry, this still comes off as "Damned if you Do; Damned if you Don't."Lil devils x said:1) Hanging giant signs does not help stop rape or help rape victims.
2) The frat hanging the sign has a history or rape, so those that were rape victims of those people now have a giant sign reminding them of that adding insult to injury.
3) Should rape victims be reminded they were raped everywhere they go or should they be allowed to heal and move on?
4) Did the frat actually try to research and coordinate with organizations that address this issue to see what they could do to help or just think hanging banners is helping?
5) People defending the sign rather than being concerned about how that sign actually affects rape victims speaks volumes of the actual concern on the issue here. If people were genuinely concerned with helping reduce rape and supporting rape victims they would be more concerned about how this actually affects rape victims and whether or not it reduces rape than taking a sign down to do so.
Of course they get the same reaction, this is a problem with the way many things are handled poorly. It isn't like these guys invented how to handle things badly. LOLSmithnikov said:I'm sorry, this still comes off as "Damned if you Do; Damned if you Don't."Lil devils x said:1) Hanging giant signs does not help stop rape or help rape victims.
2) The frat hanging the sign has a history or rape, so those that were rape victims of those people now have a giant sign reminding them of that adding insult to injury.
3) Should rape victims be reminded they were raped everywhere they go or should they be allowed to heal and move on?
4) Did the frat actually try to research and coordinate with organizations that address this issue to see what they could do to help or just think hanging banners is helping?
5) People defending the sign rather than being concerned about how that sign actually affects rape victims speaks volumes of the actual concern on the issue here. If people were genuinely concerned with helping reduce rape and supporting rape victims they would be more concerned about how this actually affects rape victims and whether or not it reduces rape than taking a sign down to do so.
Also, as for the "Did they just think hanging a banner is helping", I could name scores of other PR stunts by SJW oriented college figures, and I wonder if they'd get the same reaction from you. How does holding a bake sale and forcing white male students, for example, to pay more promote the cause of equality, for example? It's par for the course.
I just don't see what's objectionable here.