Fuck Being a Good Person

Recommended Videos

Emiscary

New member
Sep 7, 2008
990
0
0
Does anyone else here vocally object when a game forces you to do "the right thing" against your will? It's only really a problem in games where choice/the illusion of choice is a centerpiece to the whole affair, but my god is it annoying.

I'd gladly use Mass Effect 3 as my example here, but to avoid offending the delicate sensibilities of a few whiny prigs, let's go with Deus Ex: Human Revolution. Considering the title of this thread, you can probably guess I went the transhuman/augment aficionado route and gave the concept of "purity" the middle finger with both hands the whole way through. But despite this, there were still multiple instances in the game wherein an arbitrary and unforeshadowed sense of heroism seemed to surge forth from Adam Jensen. Like say when I sat through Tai-Yong's song and dance and let her feel me up as opposed to breaking both her legs with my augs and dragging her back to Sarif industries in a suitcase. Orrr when the game decided to make William Taggart immortal following that press conference in which I publicly shamed him. Or when the game decided automatically that I'd wanna talk Taggart's lackey into not killing himself. And here's an example of something that *wasn't* in the game that should've been: an option to violently and spectacularly murder Hugh Darrow after he's done throwing his temper tantrum (yes, you can just blow his head off but that's hardly satisfying).

Why do I want all of these options so much? Well it's simple: Deus Ex was a game that let me throw my weight around. It made me *feel* like a superhuman force that was more or less just above society's rules and laws. I remember spending my downtime in game mugging cops and taking their guns for fun, and crushing gangsters with the business end of a dumpster for mouthing off. Point is, my Adam Jensen was most definitely not a selfless hero, nor did he pretend to be. So what's with the clause that makes him an automatically good, selfless and trusting person when the chips are down?

I'll explain it the way one of my favorite DM's did back in the day: there's the bad guys, and there's the antagonists. You don't have to be nice to be the hero of a story. So if you're gonna give me the option of doing things rough, don't muzzle me at X/Y point arbitrarily.

*Let* me throw Hugh Darrow through a plate glass window and listen to him scream on the way down to meet his monster. *Let* me say: "So? Do it." when a side character I have no connection to puts a gun to his head. And *let* me be a skeptical and violent asshole when dealing with people of suspect character.

And this is one that all games just plain need: a "SHUT THE FUCK UP!" button. Y'know how ME had interrupts for especially noble/efficient actions? Well there needs to be a "SHUT UP!" clause for when characters are being forced to sit through dialogue that they're not interested in hearing. Let's take The Witcher 2 as our example here. Sayyy, when some ditzy merchant starts asking you random non-sequitors about your life? Give me an option to cut them off mid sentence and say somethin' like:

"Listen carefully, I don't care about you or anything you think about. Now shut up and take my coin before I get mad."

Rude? Absolutely. But this is a *game*, I should be allowed to be rude in this context when I damn well please. Having to sit through boring conversations for the sake of courtesy is a burden I have to shoulder in the real world, I shouldn't have to do it in games too. And yes, you can "skip" dialogue if you want, but time warping through a conversation kills any latent sense of immersion you had in what was going on instantly. I'd *much* rather be able to tell annoying/long winded/etc. people to go fuck a cactus. Significantly more satisfying, and it has a role playing benefit.
 

darth.pixie

New member
Jan 20, 2011
1,449
0
0
Agreed, though so few can write a good villain story, they might as well not bother. Even Overlord had to face an eviler force. The key to this sort of plot is having a personal antagonist and most games are a save the world deal.

But hey, if you want a cool game where you're the evil one, try Deception (In the first one, you're trying to resurrect Satan)
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Uh... DE:HR gave you loads of opportunities to be a dick.

You can allow Sanderval to commit suicide. You can murder Taggart. You can give Darrow the fist chisels of doom treatment.

The thing with "Tai-Yong" (was that really her name?) wasn't so much a case of heroism as it was old fashioned protagonist cutscene stupidity.
 

Emiscary

New member
Sep 7, 2008
990
0
0
Zhukov said:
Uh... DE:HR gave you loads of opportunities to be a dick.

You can allow Sanderval to commit suicide. You can murder Taggart. You can give Darrow the fist chisels of doom treatment.

The thing with "Tai-Yong" (was that really her name?) wasn't so much a case of heroism as it was old fashioned protagonist cutscene stupidity.
Take note of the vocabulary you just used. "Allow" him to commit suicide? I don't want to not prevent it, I want to encourage it. Hell, I wanna take the gun out of his hands and shoot him twice in the gut so he bleeds out in his bunker.

And I noted you can kill the guy, but its an afterthought. It's obviously not something you're expected to do or given any incentive to do, it's just something you can do. Killing him is exactly the same thing as killing 1 of the random mooks you find on the station. Not good enough.

Also cutscene stupidity is not something you should ever try and justify. Ever.
 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,665
0
0
*SPOILERS* maybe?

I do agree, we should have more of a choice in games...but also, they are video games. Different choices take some time and effort to make. Even more, if you want them to be well executed. And in the end, the plot is limiting. The devs simply cannot put all the possible options, choices and consequences in there. Doing so would amount to making more than one game, so a certain inflexibility is to be expected.

With that said, certain choices and consequences can be added. It has been proven to work. And the plot could still be left mostly intact.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Emiscary said:
Zhukov said:
Uh... DE:HR gave you loads of opportunities to be a dick.

You can allow Sanderval to commit suicide. You can murder Taggart. You can give Darrow the fist chisels of doom treatment.

The thing with "Tai-Yong" (was that really her name?) wasn't so much a case of heroism as it was old fashioned protagonist cutscene stupidity.
Take note of the vocabulary you just used. "Allow" him to commit suicide? I don't want to not prevent it, I want to encourage it. Hell, I wanna take the gun out of his hands and shoot him twice in the gut so bleeds out in his bunker.

And I noted you can kill the guy, but its an afterthought. It's obviously not something you're expected to do or given any incentive to do, it's just something you can do. Killing him is exactly the same thing as killing 1 of the random mooks you find on the station. Not good enough.

Also cutscene stupidity is not something you should ever try and justify. Ever.
Eh, I guess.

I can't say I would fault a game for not meticulously catering to my every juvenile sadistic fantasy, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

Also, I wasn't justifying the cutscene stupidity, just pointing it out. I thought it was pretty ridiculous. I mean, really Adam? Turning your back on her? Really?!
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
I don't think every game has to have an "evil" option shoehorned in if the game doesn't take that option anywhere interesting. That said, have you tried Paradox Interactive games? From what I've played of Crusader Kings 2 (which is to say that I'm about 1/4 through the tutorial - that's a crazy in-depth game) you can definitely play it as a medieval bastard simulator. Sure, it's more of a machiavellian sort of evil than a belligerent asshole sort of evil, but that's more interesting anyway.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Well for starters, no sandbox game is truly a sandbox. They've all got pre-written stories that, one way or another, follow the Good Guys vs Bad Guys format. Quite simply: they don't want a game where the bad guys win. I'm not saying I've played every game out there, but personally I liked Knights of the Old Republic because you actually had the genuine choice of "I'm gonna be a Sith, Mother-Fuck the god damn Republic, I'm gonna take over this *****!" And sure enough you can kill your treacherous apprentice, reclaim the Star Forge, and realize your dark ambitions once and for all!

The point is that KotOR is perhaps the only game that I, personally, can think of that has a genuine "The Bad Guys Win" possibility for an ending. But see KotOR actually had a good reason/story that allowed for it to have a Bag Guys Win ending. KotOR's story progressed with you assuming you're a good (or at least neutral) guy at the start of the game, or at least there's room for conflict because the bad guys (Malak's forces) are trying to kill you. So you progress through the game and don't officially find out that you're really some ultra badass who used to be pretty damn evil. From there you're given the choice of renouncing your evil ways and becoming the shining beacon of hope and justice the Jedi's always hoped you would become...or you can choose to reclaim your dark mantle of Lord of the Sith, strike down your treacherous apprentice, and take back your empire.

With today's games, you're not given such a choice to return to a past of darkness. The game puts you in the situation of a hero and your only choice is really "Are you a true hero? Or are you an anti-hero?"

For instance, I finally got done with my Full Renegade playthrough of ME 3...annnnnnd yeah, ReneShep gets the job done just as well as ParaShep, the only real difference is that ReneShep is just the most backstabbing son-of-a-***** in the entire galaxy. Between Mordin, Wrex, and having to put Legion down like he's Ol' Space Yeller ("HOW IS THAT A THING?!" :p) ReneShep proves that there's no one he won't throw under the bus and utterly betray as long as it suits his purpose. ParaShep proves that she'll bend over backwards to make and spread peace to serve her purpose. The thing is both of them have the same purpose: defeat the Reapers. ReneShep isn't trying to defeat the Reapers so that HE can control the galaxy (like Darth Revan wants to defeat Malak so that HE can control the Sith), he's just not afraid to make any sacrifice necessary to win.

In short: games that have a morality system don't really let you choose between being a bad guy or being a good guy, they're choosing "Do you want to be a nice guy on your way to achieve your goals? Or do you want to be a fucking asshole?"

I'd say the Bioshock games, though, make an admirable attempt at having Good Guy/Bad Guy endings. BS 1: Leave Rapture vs Take It Over and Become Splicer King. BS 2: Free a benevolent super powered girl who will help mankind progress to the future vs Unleash a malevolent ***** who cannot wait to to exercise her "daddy's" bloody wrath upon society.

Annnnnnnnd I'm officially starting to ramble so I'll kindly shut the fuck up now. :p
 

Lunar Shadow

New member
Dec 9, 2008
653
0
0
Been playing Crusader Kings II. I have literally spent hours murdering children so that my ruler's son could inherit countries. This includes killing his own children so the right one inherits everything. Yeah, that game encourages being a right ****.
 

Dendio

New member
Mar 24, 2010
701
0
0
Star wars the old republic and the Kotor series go out of their way to allow you to do bad things for the sake of seeing people suffer
 

Emiscary

New member
Sep 7, 2008
990
0
0
Dendio said:
Star wars the old republic and the Kotor series go out of their way to allow you to do bad things for the sake of being seeing people suffer
That kind of misses the point... its not about arbitrary sadism, it's about letting me actually act like a jerk consistently if I want to. Whether it's vengeful jerkdom, spiteful jerkdom, w.e.
 

daveman247

New member
Jan 20, 2012
1,366
0
0
Emiscary said:
eh i think you missed the point of the game. Jensen is just like shepard in mass effect, he is set to "hero mode" whatever happens. It just depends if you want to walk on water or bend the rules a little.

The choice in deus ex is not really from the story too much, but more on how you upgrade yourself. Even Denton in the first game acted a certain way to move the plot forward.

Having a true "good" and "evil" side to the game is a big ask. Its almost like creating two games in one.


Still think bards tale had the best choice to the endings. It had the "fuck it i'm going home" choice :p
 

Swyftstar

New member
May 19, 2011
653
0
0
I hear you, I usually like to do two playthroughs on games like that so I can be good and a jerk and even when you do get the option to be a jerk, you lose out on some things. For example, you could help that guy out, get that rare item only he has as a reward and a bunch of other goodies you find while doing the quest or you can tell him to go to hell and get maybe the cash on his body.

I would also like the option of forcing the issue with less than helpful npcs.
Me: "I need that item, information, weapon, armor."
Them: "Ok, I just need you to get something for me, kill someone for me, pay me exorbitant amounts of cash"
Me: "How about I don't kill you and we call it even?"
 

Radoh

Bans for the Ban God~
Jun 10, 2010
1,456
0
0
Have you perhaps considered that you are playing an actual character in Deus Ex, and not just filling an empty vessel?
Adam Jensen has opinions, thoughts, ideas, and personality traits. You aren't playing you in Deus Ex, you are playing him.
It's the same reason why in Mass Effect Three you don't get to just say, 'Screw you all, I'm taking my ship and going into deep space.' Shepard already exists, you just sway his/her choices.
 

DeepComet5581

New member
Mar 30, 2010
519
0
0
Emiscary said:
Zhukov said:
Uh... DE:HR gave you loads of opportunities to be a dick.

You can allow Sanderval to commit suicide. You can murder Taggart. You can give Darrow the fist chisels of doom treatment.

The thing with "Tai-Yong" (was that really her name?) wasn't so much a case of heroism as it was old fashioned protagonist cutscene stupidity.
Take note of the vocabulary you just used. "Allow" him to commit suicide? I don't want to not prevent it, I want to encourage it. Hell, I wanna take the gun out of his hands and shoot him twice in the gut so he bleeds out in his bunker.

And I noted you can kill the guy, but its an afterthought. It's obviously not something you're expected to do or given any incentive to do, it's just something you can do. Killing him is exactly the same thing as killing 1 of the random mooks you find on the station. Not good enough.

Also cutscene stupidity is not something you should ever try and justify. Ever.
With Sandoval, if you decide to blaze guns through most of the game, there is a new cutscene in which you violently get the same info AND get to kill him afterwards.

 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
Emiscary said:
Oh sweet God yes. While I dont think it would work with a game in which you have a very defined character (like DE:HR), a game where your character is your character, this would be awesome.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Zhukov said:
Emiscary said:
Zhukov said:
Uh... DE:HR gave you loads of opportunities to be a dick.

You can allow Sanderval to commit suicide. You can murder Taggart. You can give Darrow the fist chisels of doom treatment.

The thing with "Tai-Yong" (was that really her name?) wasn't so much a case of heroism as it was old fashioned protagonist cutscene stupidity.
Take note of the vocabulary you just used. "Allow" him to commit suicide? I don't want to not prevent it, I want to encourage it. Hell, I wanna take the gun out of his hands and shoot him twice in the gut so bleeds out in his bunker.

And I noted you can kill the guy, but its an afterthought. It's obviously not something you're expected to do or given any incentive to do, it's just something you can do. Killing him is exactly the same thing as killing 1 of the random mooks you find on the station. Not good enough.

Also cutscene stupidity is not something you should ever try and justify. Ever.
Eh, I guess.

I can't say I would fault a game for not meticulously catering to my every juvenile sadistic fantasy, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

Also, I wasn't justifying the cutscene stupidity, just pointing it out. I thought it was pretty ridiculous. I mean, really Adam? Turning your back on her? Really?!
I seem to remember a subtle implication that she used a CASIE mod.

OT: None of the 'rail-road' points you described would really lead me to describe Jensen as behaving righteously; just not maniacally for no reason at all times. The only thing where I thought they were too restrictive was with Sandoval (and the boss fights, obviously), because it did make sense that you'd at least be able to tell him to go fuck himself.

The point of Jensen is that you can explore personality sides of someone who is still convincingly the same character no matter what you say. Obviously that throws up some inherent disconnects, ones which should be ironed out, but for the most part I thought it was handled very well.

Totally forgot about this actually.