Furry Morality Question

Recommended Videos

CM156_v1legacy

Revelation 9:6
Mar 23, 2011
3,997
0
0
Vidi Kitty said:
artanis_neravar said:
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
You really are nothing but a racist who can't see they way others do and can't agree with or even put up with the thought of someone choosing to be so drastically different.
Wait, you are serious?


Racist? Come on.
Next you are going to be comparing us to Nazis. And before you do, making fun of someone who likes a drawing of two animal-people getting it on is not in any way comparable to the crimes of the Third Reich.
If you hate something that you don't understand, and the people that fall into that category then yes you are a racist
Couldn't have put it better. Also if I were going to compare you people to Nazis, I might mention how you expect people to fall in like with your thinking even though it is extremely against a certain group just because you think you are right >.>
I don't deny that furries have a right to be furries. They do. They have the right to draw what they want, write what they want, speek what they want, ect.


artanis_neravar said:
CM156 said:
artanis_neravar said:
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
You really are nothing but a racist who can't see they way others do and can't agree with or even put up with the thought of someone choosing to be so drastically different.
Wait, you are serious?


Racist? Come on.
Next you are going to be comparing us to Nazis. And before you do, making fun of someone who likes a drawing of two animal-people getting it on is not in any way comparable to the crimes of the Third Reich.
If you hate something that you don't understand, and the people that fall into that category then yes you are a racist
Rrac·ism   /ˈreɪsɪzəm/
[rey-siz-uhm]

?noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.


Last I checked, furries are not a race. They are a group.

And what if I hate them because I understand them? Which is the case here.
If you hate people who want to become hybrids, which would be a race, then it would be racism.
And hating something that you fully understand makes you a terrible person
Really now? Lets turn around that last stement

Do you like racism? Yes? Then you are a bad person

No? You hate it? That makes you a terrible person!

How could I hate something WITHOUT understanding it.


And we would be dealing with another species, not another race, so you can go ahead and put away your "race card".
However, furries are not the only ones with these rights. They have every right to write bad fanfiction, and I have every right to call it stupid.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
kitetsu said:
artanis_neravar said:
Kralen's anti-mutant sentiments are exactly why Magneto formed the Brotherhood
I dunno, last I heard, ol' Mags went "evil" because he killed people out of frustration at being persecuted (for being jewish, at that), not because he takes joy in killing children.
Wait....what? when did I mention killing children?
 

Ryengu

New member
May 22, 2011
113
0
0
CM156 said:
And I have yet to see any furry art that was not intended to arouse someone.
Then I can honestly say you haven't been looking very closely. Sorry.
 

artanis_neravar

New member
Apr 18, 2011
2,560
0
0
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
artanis_neravar said:
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
You really are nothing but a racist who can't see they way others do and can't agree with or even put up with the thought of someone choosing to be so drastically different.
Wait, you are serious?


Racist? Come on.
Next you are going to be comparing us to Nazis. And before you do, making fun of someone who likes a drawing of two animal-people getting it on is not in any way comparable to the crimes of the Third Reich.
If you hate something that you don't understand, and the people that fall into that category then yes you are a racist
Couldn't have put it better. Also if I were going to compare you people to Nazis, I might mention how you expect people to fall in like with your thinking even though it is extremely against a certain group just because you think you are right >.>
I don't deny that furries have a right to be furries. They do. They have the right to draw what they want, write what they want, speek what they want, ect.

However, furries are not the only ones with these rights. They have every right to write bad fanfiction, and I have every right to call it stupid.
You seem to be talking about people who like furry drawings videos etc, instead of human animal hybrids that the racist comment incorporated
 

Vidi Kitty

New member
Feb 20, 2010
252
0
0
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
artanis_neravar said:
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
You really are nothing but a racist who can't see they way others do and can't agree with or even put up with the thought of someone choosing to be so drastically different.
Wait, you are serious?


Racist? Come on.
Next you are going to be comparing us to Nazis. And before you do, making fun of someone who likes a drawing of two animal-people getting it on is not in any way comparable to the crimes of the Third Reich.
If you hate something that you don't understand, and the people that fall into that category then yes you are a racist
Couldn't have put it better. Also if I were going to compare you people to Nazis, I might mention how you expect people to fall in like with your thinking even though it is extremely against a certain group just because you think you are right >.>
I don't deny that furries have a right to be furries. They do. They have the right to draw what they want, write what they want, speek what they want, ect.

However, furries are not the only ones with these rights. They have every right to write bad fanfiction, and I have every right to call it stupid.
All bad fan fiction is stupid. And everyone has the right to like and dislike as they please. I just drawn the line at people being willfully ignorant (not you specifically) and trying to force their opinions on others.
 

DeltaWolfson

New member
May 9, 2011
186
0
0
Yes you may do some art work, but you need to know that's it a different type of art others may like it you may not. Thats how art worked for the last two hundred years. Lastly and also sorry to rain on your parade but wake up it's the 21st Century that type of art furry or not is every where.
 

BlindMessiah94

The 94th Blind Messiah
Nov 12, 2009
2,654
0
0
Harkwell said:
On my way home today I had thought pop into my head. It has to do with furries but its not nessesarily restricted to them. Here goes.

Alright so a research company comes up with a serum and releases it this year. The company itself is not important, the serum itself is not important. If you have to ask, the company made the serum for the betterment of humanity.

What the serum does is improve your mental and physical prowess above that of a normal human. However, we're being realistic here. Your not Captian America, but the average serum user is equal in brains to a smart human. A genius user will always be smarter than a genius non-user. If you have never been able to lift a car, well now you can alibet only a foot or two. You can work longer, harder, faster, better, and stronger.

However, the serum does this by combining animal traits with human traits producing animal-human hybrids, the aforemention furry part. Using the serum turns you into a furry (assuming there are multiple types of serums for people who want a specific hybrid, one for a fox-human, wolf-human, etc...)

Obviously the person who uses it is going to face a lot of social problems, discrimination prominently. Honestly, I'd do it. Discrimination be damned I'd probably be smarter than all my co-workers, score one promotion for me.
Sounds like the beginning of a really badly written comic book.

But seriously, I'm not a furry, so I wouldn't get some sort of fetish enjoyment out of it or anything...The superhuman trait thing...well I probably wouldn't do it to be honest. Maybe when I'm like 70 or something, but just for the lulz. Besides, if everyone takes the serum, then you're not really the smartest or anything, just one of many, so it wouldn't really set you apart in any other way than...you had fur.
 

CM156_v1legacy

Revelation 9:6
Mar 23, 2011
3,997
0
0
Vidi Kitty said:
CM156 said:
And I have yet to see any furry art that was not intended to arouse someone.
Stop looking for porn then.

EDIT: Best 100th post ever.
I don't, but that does not prevent some furries I have agrued with to post it in response.

Ryengu said:
CM156 said:
And I have yet to see any furry art that was not intended to arouse someone.
Then I can honestly say you haven't been looking very closely. Sorry.
Perhaps. However, I don't frequently google "Yiff", so that could be the issue here.
 

KimonoBoxFox

New member
Jun 1, 2011
43
0
0
This is not something that society should be tolerant about though. We should not accept rampant genetic modification as a good thing. And there's a world of difference between a botox treatment and becoming a hybrid. The difference being that one is altering a person on the genetic level.
Actually, the comparison is between genetic alteration, and injecting yourself with Botulin toxins, dear. It's the same risk, just different mediums of medical science--toxicology versus genetics.
 

Ryengu

New member
May 22, 2011
113
0
0
jimahaff said:
like would being part dolphin let you breathe under water?
Minor quibble, but dolphins can't breathe underwater :B They can just hold their breath a reaaalllyy long time.
 

DanDeFool

Elite Member
Aug 19, 2009
1,891
0
41
Somehow, I think there would be discrimination even within the furrified faction. After all, if you got your genes spliced with, say, a tortoise, or an iguana, that would definitely be a much bigger change than getting spliced with some kind of mammal's genome. I can imagine there being a great deal of infighting between the lizard-people and the non-primate-mammal people.

Or do reptilian hybrids not count as "furries", on account of the fact that they're not "furry"? I don't really get how broadly furdom is supposed to be defined.
 

Spade Lead

New member
Nov 9, 2009
1,042
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
Absolutely disgusting. There is already a huge social inequality gap in the developed world. Something like this would only serve to widen it even further. People would be denied opportunities becuase they could not afford to purchase this serum. People would be incapable of doing as much as those who were fortunate enough to get the wealth needed to acquire it. Some people will merely use the serum to make up for their own lack of effort. Such a thing will only bring problems to our society, and thus must not be used.

As for it turning people into an animal human hybrid, that just makes a bad thing even worse. Hybrids brought about through the manipulation of genes should not be allowed in society. It would lead to a ton of discrimination from both sides. Humans would resent them for being "unnatural", while hybrids would view themselves as the superior species due to their genetic modifications. This would cause a ton of problems, obviously.
It seems that you have put more thought into this than most of the people in this thread (Who I would put money on couldn't afford the serum if it was invented anyway). That said, I agree with you. It would also start another cold war, as the first world countries gave it to their soldiers and then ran rough-shod over the under-developed countries in any conflict that came up.

Plus, imagine what would happen to the Wolf-Soldiers when the got into an adrenaline fueled rage. Remember the Battlefields of Vietnam, where American soldiers slaughtered whole villages? That would be the norm, not the exception...

No, "I cannot condone a course of action that will lead my people to war."
 

JoshuaMadoc

New member
Sep 3, 2008
165
0
0
I've heard so much anti-furry sentiment out of internet users that I just wonder if they're actually serious about throwing ordinance at real hybrids.
 

Vidi Kitty

New member
Feb 20, 2010
252
0
0
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
CM156 said:
And I have yet to see any furry art that was not intended to arouse someone.
Stop looking for porn then.

EDIT: Best 100th post ever.
I don't, but that does not prevent some furries I have agrued with to post it in response.

Ryengu said:
CM156 said:
And I have yet to see any furry art that was not intended to arouse someone.
Then I can honestly say you haven't been looking very closely. Sorry.
Perhaps. However, I don't frequently google "Yiff", so that could be the issue here.

Googling that will only ever pop up one type of art. I'm calling it. Troll.
 

CM156_v1legacy

Revelation 9:6
Mar 23, 2011
3,997
0
0
Vidi Kitty said:
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
artanis_neravar said:
CM156 said:
Vidi Kitty said:
You really are nothing but a racist who can't see they way others do and can't agree with or even put up with the thought of someone choosing to be so drastically different.
Wait, you are serious?


Racist? Come on.
Next you are going to be comparing us to Nazis. And before you do, making fun of someone who likes a drawing of two animal-people getting it on is not in any way comparable to the crimes of the Third Reich.
If you hate something that you don't understand, and the people that fall into that category then yes you are a racist
Couldn't have put it better. Also if I were going to compare you people to Nazis, I might mention how you expect people to fall in like with your thinking even though it is extremely against a certain group just because you think you are right >.>
I don't deny that furries have a right to be furries. They do. They have the right to draw what they want, write what they want, speek what they want, ect.

However, furries are not the only ones with these rights. They have every right to write bad fanfiction, and I have every right to call it stupid.
All bad fan fiction is stupid. And everyone has the right to like and dislike as they please. I just drawn the line at people being willfully ignorant (not you specifically) and trying to force their opinions on others.
My point is that they want to express themselves. Which is fine.
But when I want to do the same? "Fursicution!"

And this is becoming derailed. Fast.

As I said before, this would change species, not race. Besides, if you CHOOSE to be something (which the first generation of these groups would have had to been) it is justified to judge them.
Fun fact: Adults do that in the real world all the time (judge people by actions and choices)

Vidi Kitty said:
Googling that will only ever pop up one type of art. I'm calling it. Troll.

Right. Because I disagree with you I must be a troll.
My friend, you are only proving what I thought about furries all along.
 

CptJackRabbit

New member
Mar 5, 2009
82
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
"It's completley unnecessary and highly disturbing that people would so freely altar their bodies in drastic ways over such trivial issues."
I question this statement. Do you already pass judgement on tattoos and piercings.. specifically the more extreme ones, or elf ear surgery, or split tongue surgery?

CM156 said:
Next you are going to be comparing us to Nazis. And before you do, making fun of someone who likes a drawing of two animal-people getting it on is not in any way comparable to the crimes of the Third Reich.
I agree... that would be a bit of an overboard claim.

Internet Kraken said:
Vidi Kitty said:
Wait wait wait. No matter how you might change your physical apearance or your species or whatever, you will still be a person.

You sir, are a racist for thinking that becoming something other than human suddenly makes you less of a person.
Except in this case it does. You're taking in animal characteristics for no reason other than "I wanna be different". It's completley unnecessary and highly disturbing that people would so freely altar their bodies in drastic ways over such trivial issues. And no, pointing this out doesn't make me a racist.
Also, furries are a group, not a race, no matter how much they wanna be.
 

Vidi Kitty

New member
Feb 20, 2010
252
0
0
DanDeFool said:
Somehow, I think there would be discrimination even within the furrified faction. After all, if you got your genes spliced with, say, a tortoise, or an iguana, that would definitely be a much bigger change than getting spliced with some kind of mammal's genome. I can imagine there being a great deal of infighting between the lizard-people and the non-primate-mammal people.

Or do reptilian hybrids not count as "furries", on account of the fact that they're not "furry"? I don't really get how broadly furdom is supposed to be defined.
Furry is just the general name. If you want specifics, lizard people would be scalies.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
KimonoBoxFox said:
This is not something that society should be tolerant about though. We should not accept rampant genetic modification as a good thing. And there's a world of difference between a botox treatment and becoming a hybrid. The difference being that one is altering a person on the genetic level.
Actually, the comparison is between genetic alteration, and injecting yourself with Botulin toxins, dear. It's the same risk, just different mediums of medical science--toxicology versus genetics.
And genetic modification is a million times more dangerous. What's your point? You can't use botox to turn yourself into perfect murder.

CptJackRabbit said:
Internet Kraken said:
"It's completley unnecessary and highly disturbing that people would so freely altar their bodies in drastic ways over such trivial issues."
I question this statement. Do you already pass judgement on tattoos and piercings.. specifically the more extreme ones, or elf ear surgery, or split tongue surgery?
Well I'll admit I personally don't care for such things, but this is nowhere near the level of modification that becoming a hybrid would be. I am in general opposed to most genetic modification becuase it a slipper slope that could easily lead to serious problems.
 

Ryengu

New member
May 22, 2011
113
0
0
CM156 said:
Perhaps. However, I don't frequently google "Yiff", so that could be the issue here.
Just check out an art site like dA, there's a whole section for anthro art. And dA has a standing no porn policy, so you shouldn't have to worry about anything unless the mod's haven't zapped it yet. Here's a link for you. http://browse.deviantart.com/anthro/