Beautiful End said:
I'm just glad a game like CoD wasn't nominated to begin with.
I hate to say it, but the original CoD (PC version, not the PS2 spin-off) actually
was pretty ground breaking in its day. Prior to that, only MoH had gone near WW2 and even attempted to stay grounded in reality. Wolfenstein did it, but went all Nazi-zombie pretty early on. What CoD did for the first time though, was to truly make you feel like a small cog in a large machine, participating in some of the most famous actions in history. MoH still insisted on giving you one obligitary epic D-Day scaled level before leaving you to your own 1-man-army devices for the rest of the game. They tried to address this in expansions, I know, but it never worked the way it did in CoD.
I still have my copies of CoD and CoD 2, both of which get played regularly to this day. As single player experiences they took the FPS rule book and while not exactly throwing it away, at least gave it a comprehensive updating and kicked off the entire modern "military shooter" genre (not to be confused with the "modern military shooter" genre which only emerged as a result of running out of the battles
everyone has heard of to set WWII games in.
Maybe not game of the decade material, but I always think people tend to forget how good the franchise
used to be.
OT: For my money, it would be GTA: San Andreas.