Wakefield said:
popdafoo said:
Wakefield said:
Guitar Hero and Resident Evil. Those two series I just head-desk everytime I hear about another one.
Well if you don't include the Wii rails shooter spin off games, Resident Evil 4 came out in 2005 and Resident Evil 5 came out in 2009.
I don't know how you CAN'T count them. They're resident Evil games after all. That's like not counting GH Metallica and Aerosmith. They count.
Anyways for me the series stopped being anything decent in RE4. I'm sorry was that suppposed to be scary? Yeah no.
Obviously not everyone shares this opinion however this is mine.
Resident Evil 4, and Resident Evil 4 for the PS2, and Resident Evil: Wii Edition, were widely lauded (Zero Punctuation, IGN, me, etc) as one of the best games EVER, despite a few flaws. Was it scary? Well, when you pointed the pad in a particular direction, the friggin' character went in that direction, so no, I guess RE4 isn't quite as scary as the prospect of actually playing all the way through the dull, boring, 1-screen-at-a-time, non-3d games that preceded it. RE4 is the tits, man. Much longer than other games of this variety, and speaking of variety: RE4 never ran out. What a satisfying finish! In how many games can you say you escaped at the end by hauling ass out of a cave on a jet ski?
So, um, yeah, I guess I disagree with you.
Hey dude, what that guy meant by "counting" was SEQUELS, not spinoffs. Wii ports (especially on-rails ports like the RE and extraction versions) are commonly referred to as bastard child games, often not even made by the same company. You think LucasArts made The Force Unleashed for Wii? No. So no, I do not ever, ever, ever count an on-rails version/remake/cash cow of a game as a part of the series progression, because THAT'S NOT WHAT IT IS.
...and if you've made it past the village in the very beginning of RE4, then I want a 5 page single-spaced essay on just wtf scares you and wtf does not. Bye for now!