To be honest, just look at the main thread. You'll be hard pressed to find 800 Posts about Zoe Quinn, let alone 800 posts of people 'obsessing graphically' over her, which you'd have to should you want your argument to hold water.BobDobolina said:Strictly speaking true; but it will be far more compelling if you ever reach the point where half of the so-called "movement" isn't still publicly and graphically obsessing about what an evil slut Zoe Quinn supposedly is. I personally suspect events will outrun your ever getting there.runic knight said:My point was something that Velventian put far more eloquently, what sparked an event does not have to forever define it.
It's about journalistic integrity, currently it's people patting Greg Tito on the back for not censoring discussion, aswell as anticipation for the release of more of the discussion the secret email group (Once its been edited to censor personal information)
The times it becomes about Zoe Quinn is when some people ( I wont name names) comes into the thread to defend Sarkeesian/Zoe Quinn from imagined attacks. Last time they were mentioned was when the first round of emails were released and Kotaku released an article of a half year old bombthreat against a convention that Sarkeesian attended to 'again' steer discussion onto Anita and ZQ and away from them.
Kotaku and their ilk are afraid of the consequences tied to their lack of journalistic integrity, so when people want to target them they take cover behind the likes of Sarkeesian to deflect any legitimate complaints and concerns.