Gamers Against Bigotry

Recommended Videos

geK0

New member
Jun 24, 2011
1,846
0
0
chrason said:
geK0 said:
So let me get this straight...... they want me to sign a pledge and donate $1.00 to them, and this will stop bigotry? I don't get it...
You don't have to donate to sign the pledge, and no, it won't stop bigotry. It isn't designed to stop bigotry. It's designed to raise awareness of the issue, so that people can understand why it's a problem, in the hope that people will, of their own volition, choose to be more inclusive and open-minded.
It's sort of an issue that raises awareness for itself; anyone who's ever entered an internet forum/chat room and anyone who's ever played an online game with chat enabled has been annoyed by these pricks : \
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,887
0
0
Keith Leung said:
Bigotry in games is a mindset not a change in language if you want a more accepting gaming social culture then start by changing gamers attitude to gender, homosexuality and race.

Limiting our free speech does not change mindset.
Agreed, it'd like covering a hole in a wall with a pretty picture, it may look nice but it's not solving the underlying problem.
 

chrason

New member
Jul 31, 2011
26
0
0
The Plunk said:
if these twats think that we shouldn't be allowed to swear at all, they can go fuck themselves.
Not the case. Swearing is fine. Racism, for example, isn't, and it'd be nice if people dispelled it. That's all.

Lt._nefarious said:
I'm all for this cause as long as it doesn't prohibit me from saying "God-FUCKING-Damnit! FUCK! I WILL KILL YOU IN YOUR SLEEP YOU FUCKING FUCK! SWEET MARY MOTHER OF FUCK I HATE YOU! STOP FUCKING CAMPING! JESUS FUCK! FUUUUUCK!" because that is not bigotry, right?
Right!
 

Arakasi

New member
Jun 14, 2011
1,252
0
0
Clearing the Eye said:
Spartan1362 said:
I couldn't be bothered to read it, but if this is the kind of group that calls L4D racist for not having any black zombies, I am not with them.
If it is not that kind, then I am probably in agreement with them.

Captcha: vicious cycle
Someone said L4D was racist? Louis is the second best character in that whole game! Madness.

[small][small]Zoey is of course the best.[/small][/small]
[small][small][small][small]Lies, Louis is easily the best, followed by Bill.[/small][/small][/small][/small]
 

Spitfire

New member
Dec 27, 2008
472
0
0
I hate to break it to you, but people's mere admission that they're not using the aformentioned profanities, is not going to incentivize the ones who do use them, to stop doing so.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
I'll just stick to responding to bigots with bigotry. After all, I can be far more inventive than most of them on the occasions I can actually be bothered to plug in my microphone (not often).

Aside from that, surely the best response is silence, concentration and killing them over and over again while they rage. Far more satisfying.
 

J-meMalone

New member
Jan 11, 2009
213
0
0
I don't see the point in this pledge. I'm obviously against bigotry, but how is signing it going to combat anything? Nobody is going to look at it and go "I won't be bigoted anymore", they likely know it's unpopular opinion but do it anyway.
 

SuperNova221

New member
May 29, 2010
393
0
0
Biggest problem I can see with this is that the only people who would take part are people who aren't into bigotry in the first place. It's not going to change anybodies mind on whether or not it's acceptable.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
chrason said:
The idea is to promote a more inclusive gaming community: one which doesn't resort to close-minded, offensive exchanges of bigoted insults; one which doesn't push people away because of their race or gender...
...or preference in games. ¬__¬

Anyway, this sounds like a cause I could get behind.
 

NiPah

New member
May 8, 2009
1,084
0
0
chrason said:
I was advocating such tame language as cheese-jockey for fun, because it made me giggle at the time. Of course I don't actually expect people to call somebody cheese-jockey, it's bloody ridiculous. There are more alternatives than just racial slurs, though.
Actually you've stumbled on the age old tactic of being bloody ridiculous in order to throw off your enemy long enough for you to win. Call them a f*** head and they'll just get pissed, call them a fish and chips without the malt vinegar and they're spending 2 minutes trying to figure out what the hell you just said instead of dodging air born death metal.

I like this idea...
 

Charli

New member
Nov 23, 2008
3,445
0
0
As hilarious as that sounds, I'm going to go no. There are times I wish the bar of intellectualism would be raised a little higher in online games, but really there is another option. Grow a thicker skin and remember to always imply that your opponents mother is waiting in your bedroom. Naked.

But do it so well worded that they barely even realize that's what you're saying.

Gamers will always eventually stoop to the lowest common denominator because there is no way to argue with it except to stoop to that level or not respond at all. You wait, they will wear a wise wo/man down.

If you stick to your own little group and stay strong it might work but... yeah.

Eventually I'd break.

I am weak.
 

Batou667

New member
Oct 5, 2011
2,238
0
0
chrason said:
It sounds like a nice idea, but crucially, one that will only work if everybody agrees to play ball. By politicising and trying to regulate how people choose to curse, you're in fact lending more weight to the coarse language of idiotic 13-year old boys (and with the best will in the world, no amount of brow-beating is going to stop them being 13-year old boys, or idiots, because the two terms may as well be interchangable).

Instead of setting up this lofty goal of inspiring a wholesale shift in the way we think about communication, why not just go through the usual channels of dick-avoidance? Play with trusted gamers on your friends lists. Use online communities to find like-minded people to game with. If somebody is a douche in-game, block them or send bad feedback. And if you think that some screaming adolescent might get a rise out of your gender or race... well, perhaps consider not telling them. Sometimes the mountain comes to Mohammed, other times Mohammed must walk to the mountain, or whatever the phrase is.
 

Jolly Co-operator

A Heavy Sword
Mar 10, 2012
1,116
0
0
Ryotknife said:
so...the solution is for the gamer community to transplant itself back into the 1950's where people hide behind masks of false goodness? I am sorry, if given the choice between what we have now or vomiting rainbows all the time, I will take what we have now despite its obvious flaws. Being honest with oneself is more important to me than false sensitivity forced down from above.

I mean, dear lord your solution sounds like it was ripped straight from the Demolition Man script. going from one extreme to another extreme is not a solution. Punishing those who blatantly cross a line for purely malicious reasons would be a better course.
I agree. This sounds like it's just imposing restrictions by means of peer pressure, rather than actually educating ignorant people who have become bigots.
 

Evan Waters

New member
Dec 12, 2007
94
0
0
All the people saying "Why do we need this, this is dishonest and it won't do anything and anyone offended by these words should just grow a thicker skin" need to tell me- what would be so horrible about people NOT using racial slurs in the course of videogame chat?

What would we lose? What specifically would signing up to this little pledge forbid you from doing that is so very important? You can still insult people. You can call them fuckfaces, assholes, human waste product, shitstains on the heel of society, you can imply that you're having sex with their mother right now, or that you did the night before, or possibly are going to in the future. You can ask spawn campers what they learned in the 3rd grade today. (Well, it's summer, but you get the idea.)

The range of personal insults is so vast that not using race, gender, sexuality, or disability doesn't even cut out 1% of what you can potentially say.

And if you're not using those words already, you lose even less. You lose nothing. Nobody's freedom of speech is being threatened, there's no great art being endangered by this.

Why do you panic so?
 

Fuhjem

New member
Jan 17, 2009
267
0
0
Here, I'll sign the petition.
But...
1) I'm still going to cuss like a motherfuck
2) If I have to use bigotry words, I'll turn off my damn mic. (sometimes anger defeats reason, unfortunately)
3) I'll stay away from bigots in online games if I can.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
Clearing the Eye said:
The solution to bigotry isn't a group.

The solution to bigotry isn't a set of rules.

The solution to bigotry is tolerance -- on all sides. That means tolerating that some people like to use words you don't like.
Dat avatar >.>. I also agree with you.
 

Ghonzor

New member
Jul 29, 2009
958
0
0
Let it be known that I fucking loved Dodge Socks. How dare you slander such a wonderful game*

*Read with a joking tone
 

bullet_sandw1ch

New member
Jun 3, 2011
536
0
0
Hazy992 said:
chrason said:
Hazy992 said:
So your answer to speaking out against bigotry is to simply become the No-Cussing Club?
No, it isn't. I've clarified this already; you can swear as much as you like, but you should try not to be bigoted. If you were part of a marginalised group in society, would you like to be belittled every time you settled down for a "friendly" bit of computerised escapism? I wouldn't, so I wouldn't impose it on others.

Swearing and bigotry are mutually exclusive, and the latter is needlessly offensive.
So why are you advocating using such tame language as 'cheese-jockey'?

In fact what the flying fuck is a cheese-jockey?
well let me ask you this:
what do you do once you have the cheese?
mount the cheese.