Dragon Age 2 left everything that was good about Dragon Age Origins behind and introduced new mechanics and ideas that didn't fit into the game and didn't work.
You had issues with the controls? What was the big deal...? I played the game all the time and the controls are A-ok. In fact they're pretty much copy-paste from RE4, which from a control standpoint was perfectly fine. The only thing a little eh was the inventory system but as long as you put the items to shortcuts on the D-Pad it was fine. And helped the flow a little what with not having to press start constantly. (Don't get me wrong though, I still love the Attache Case.)William Catching said:I bought RE 5 to see what all the fuss was about. It didn't so much dissapoint me as I wanted to obliterate the fucking thing with a orbital strike.The controls are complete shit, and the story is even shittier. I hear people say, "The game doesn't let you aim and move because it makes it more challenging, the control scheme just heightens the difficulty" When did it become about the fucking controls and not the enemies in the game itself?! Seriously!
while i do feel the combat of dragon age was too simplistic, i felt like it was more complex than kotor. in dragon age i would at least have to change strategies from time to time. in kotor i literally just spammed flurry until all the enemies were dead. then again, i played dragon age on pc, i heard dragon age was significantly better on pc than on consolesxXAsherahXx said:You could argue that KOTOR had basically the same gameplay, but I liked the complexity of the battle system in KOTOR as opposed to pressing 3 buttons of interchangeable attacks and spells.
Yeah I'm with you. I have never felt disappointed with a game. If I didn't like it or was bored with a game that was it. Well I've never actually 'felt' disappointment, just boredom.Addison Sowers said:Reading these comments, I have found that I am incredibly easy to please when it comes to video games! Haha!
But if I had to pick one that really disappointed me, it would be Fable 3.
Fable II, it didn't so much disapoint, but downright broke my heart!ParanoidAndroid said:I want to know what games looked great pre-production, but failed to impress you once they were in your hands?
Yeah, that's the bad thing though. Despite not being bad, Bioshock 2 seemed a lot worse due to the high expectations. However, that can work the other way as well. I walked into Duke Nukem Forever expecting a horrendous wreck of a game, and was pleasantly surprised when met with a mediocre shooter with it's primary drawbacks being technical and design issues. It wasn't that great, but it seemed much better than it actually was due to my low expectations.MapTa said:I must agree, I was so excited. It wasn't bad, it was just mediocre.Eofofo said:Bioshock 2. Nuff Said.
Damn, ninja'd at the first post.Eofofo said:Bioshock 2. Nuff Said.