Yeah, pretty much. But a bird in the hand is better than two in the bush. I'm grateful for the contributions I get.-Drifter- said:I feel that most of the people in this thread have missed the point. He's talking about games where the designated hero can, with a different perspective, easily be seen as the villain, not games where it's dramatically revealed or presented as a choice. At least, that's the impression I got.
On that note, Mirror's Edge. I can't shake the feeling that the Runners are probably drug traffickers at best and terrorists at worst, and there seem to be subtle hints that at the very least Faith and company aren't as noble as they make themselves out to be. In the first level Faith complains that the police "just opened fire," leaving out the bit where they warned her to drop the bag and put her hands in the air and only shot after she refused and ran away. Not that that's going to matter much in the face of the many murders you'll have committed before the game is over (murders of high-ranking law officers, no less.)
Well you play an "assassin" those aren't supposed to be "good" people.freaper said:Assassin's Creed anyone? (tough someone might have mentioned it) You slay hordes of guards, with each a family to feed, and more often than not for no apparent reason other than to test whether you can impale two brutes with one spear. Also punching beggars...
I was gonna but you beat me to it.DaHero said:Wow, how has nobody mentioned S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Shadow of Chernobyl yet? Strelok!
Yeah, it's all in the title. I may change the title but I can't think of a better way to phrase it in such a short way that still grabs people's attention. Can you think of one?waj9876 said:Well, it seems not many people are too keen to read anything passed the title. Because if they were, they'd realize they weren't supposed to name ANY game where you are the villain. Just the ones that are presented as good, and in hindsight are HORRIBLE people.
I'd have to say Heather Mason from Silent Hill 3. Even after the possibility that the monsters you've been killing are actually just random people she's murdering, does that stop her? No.
this, cause i see no other way to see it, that whole game was just one evil git VS a lot of evil gitsDoPo said:Also, Prototype.
Of course you sort of play the bad guy. Depending on your point of view. But at the very least, you play the exact image of the guy who decided to unleash a super deadly virus on the world just because he was a bit pissed at the time.
I mean, Alex eats people. And by eats I mean he completely murderizes them. That's in addition to him flailing his Lovecraftian limbs around.
I fail to see how big boss is the bad guy in 3 as he's sent in to destroy metal gear (a nuclear device that evil people are going to use to terrorize the world)daveman247 said:Wait what? Unless you mean the coop then fair enoughArtorius said:Portal
Well in metal gear solid 3 and peace walker you play as big boss. So, yeah.
EDIT: Oh and pretty much any RPG in which the "hero" lets himself into a strangers house, interrorgates them for a bit and then proceeds to rob them blind "for the greater good of saving the land".
Punching Beggars? Hell no. In the first game they got the hidden blade because you could easily kill them and walk away before anyone noticed they were dead.freaper said:Assassin's Creed anyone? (tough someone might have mentioned it) You slay hordes of guards, with each a family to feed, and more often than not for no apparent reason other than to test whether you can impale two brutes with one spear. Also punching beggars...
ResonanceSD said:*looks around*
Can't believe I'm first to say this.
KOTOR! You're REVAN!
I Think that this--^ is why no one else said it.-Drifter- said:I feel that most of the people in this thread have missed the point. He's talking about games where the designated hero can, with a different perspective, easily be seen as the villain, not games where it's dramatically revealed or presented as a choice.