Gamespot Gives The Simpson's Arcade Game A 3 Out Of 10...

Recommended Videos

RoBi3.0

New member
Mar 29, 2009
709
0
0
ThatPurpleGuy said:
RoBi3.0 said:
People still take Gamespot seriously? That is what seems odd to me.
People taking any review seriously is odd to me..It always just 'one mans view' no matter how unbiased they claim they are. Also most reviewers play a game just to review it, which means at best 1 playthrough, sometimes not even that. Now to me any game worth anything won't be able to be fully 'reviewed' unless a player has put a tonne of hours into it, good games have alot of depth, which most of these reviewers wouldn't even come close to seeing with such limited time.
This has always been I opinion on the matter as well. I have always said everyone would be best served finding the game reviewer that best fits their gaming views and interests and follow that one person, and fuck the rest, cause everyone is different.

I also have a problem with assigning arbitrary number scores to game reviews, but I guess that is another topic altogether.
 

ThatPurpleGuy

New member
Feb 4, 2010
302
0
0
RoBi3.0 said:
ThatPurpleGuy said:
RoBi3.0 said:
People still take Gamespot seriously? That is what seems odd to me.
People taking any review seriously is odd to me..It always just 'one mans view' no matter how unbiased they claim they are. Also most reviewers play a game just to review it, which means at best 1 playthrough, sometimes not even that. Now to me any game worth anything won't be able to be fully 'reviewed' unless a player has put a tonne of hours into it, good games have alot of depth, which most of these reviewers wouldn't even come close to seeing with such limited time.
This has always been I opinion on the matter as well. I have always said everyone would be best served finding the game reviewer that best fits their gaming views and interests and follow that one person, and fuck the rest, cause everyone is different.

I also have a problem with assigning arbitrary number scores to game reviews, but I guess that is another topic altogether.
Ahh the number system for scores is what makes the whole review thing even worse. I read an article once somewhere and it explained that because from our schooling we are all conditioned to the fact that 50% is a pass and anything less is a complete fail. This leaves numbers 1-5 worthless as we have seen what has happened in The Simpsons game review. the 3/10 is seen as complete disaster, when really if we are grading out of 10 a 3 should be more like "playable but still below average, don't expect too much".
 

Jesse Billingsley

New member
Mar 21, 2011
400
0
0
Kyle Donovan said:
Not even gonna say anything, read the ridiculous review here. Put your comments below. http://www.gamespot.com/the-simpsons-arcade-game/reviews/the-simpsons-arcade-game-review-6349795/
Anything that isn't COD, Halo or Battlefield is lucky to get even a 7/10 from Gamespot. They are way to bias, which is why I gave them up when I discovered The Escapist.
 

Atmos Duality

New member
Mar 3, 2010
8,473
0
0
Eh. I thought it was crap even back in the day.
Played one for a while at Fudrucker's because I was bored out of my mind.
 

RagTagBand

New member
Jul 7, 2011
497
0
0
Reviewing a 21 year old game by modern standards is pretty fucking stupid now matter how you paint it, it has been re-released because of nostalgia...not because the porters think they've improved it, not because it has been modernized but simply because "Shit was so cash back in '91".

I mean for fucks sake Space Invaders would be lucky to get a 1/10 by todays standards; You can't judge a fish by it's ability to climb trees.

I'm not saying the reviewer is factually wrong, just that his review is redundant.
 

Flunk

New member
Feb 17, 2008
915
0
0
If you liked this game when you were younger take a look at the Scott Pilgrim Arcade game on Live or PSN. It's a thoughly updated experience that still shares a lot with these old games. Great fun for up to 4 players even if you hate Scott Pilgrim and wish that he would burn in hell.
 

Headdrivehardscrew

New member
Aug 22, 2011
1,660
0
0
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:
NuclearShadow said:
I have to question if the reviewer actually played it back when this game was taking our money away one quarter at a time. (or in my case Chuckie Cheese tokens) The game is a classic and it lives up to the admiration. It was so fun playing with others, it was both challenging and entertaining and of course the Simpsons were much bigger back then. The fact that he would complain that the game is only about 40 mins long is a joke, how long would you want a true arcade game to be? That is pretty long for a real arcade game. He clearly has no care of this factor and tries to review it as a modern day console game, which it is not.
The thing is, its no longer an arcade game. Its now being played on a console. And for a console game, it sucks.

I dont see the problem with the score.
Aye, I have to second that.

What a lot of people seem to forget or outright ignore is the fact that the tech has changed significantly in the last twenty years. One problem is we're meanwhile used to much 'better' graphics, but a good game will remain to be a good game as long as it was released on the good side of the 1990 border. Another problem that really annoys me personally is that the clunky old and obsolete CRT displays were part of the deal, it was how we saw things, and it was how people developed things. Playing The Simpsons on a modern console and, more importantly, a modern TV, sucks hairy moose ass because publishers tend not to include the essential, but cheap little gimmick of emulated scan lines. It's those scan lines that make the graphics look like yesteryear, and they really are essential for anything ranging from the C=64 to the Neo Geo. This lack of attention is only topped with how they handle retro games on, say, iOS - poor controls, unnecessary updates and idiotic use of screen real estate make these games unplayable and no fun at all.

The only ones so far that did an excellent job with bringing an old title into the space age were the folks that handled the Monkey Islands for iOS - not everything needs updated and improved graphics, mind you, but the sheer elegance of it is a milestone that was mostly ignored by everyone else in the business. Quite a shame, that.
 

Bomberman4000

New member
Jun 23, 2010
335
0
0
RagTagBand said:
You can't judge a fish by it's ability to climb trees.
*slow clap*

Made me laugh. Good line.

OT: I don't understand why people have such a hard time admitting games they played when they were young kids aren't as good today as they were back then. In my experiences I have VEEEEERY few games that I could say that if I played them today I'd have just as much fun as I did when I was younger. They just don't hold up. Times change, our tastes change, technology changes. Doesn't mean they weren't great games for the time, but as we get older we must be able to admit when things we liked as kids weren't all that great. I'm talking less about this game specifically and just as a commentary on nostalgic gamers in general.

Also, why anyone would get bent out of shape about a retro review (or any review really) is beyond me. Chances are if you didn't play the game in the arcades (I didn't) you're not going to get it anyway, and if you did and liked it, you probably will.

If you don't like the score or the review, write one of your own. Make a video explaining why you like this game and why it deserves a better score. Who knows, it may lead to a job one day and people can then complain about YOUR scores.


...it's the ciiiiiiiircle of liiiiiife....
 

Sylveria

New member
Nov 15, 2009
1,285
0
0
Oh Gamespot.... You mean the 90s arcade game plays exactly like a 90s arcade game? SHOCK AND AWE!
 

King Kupofried

New member
Jan 19, 2010
347
0
0
Well lets be honest here.

If you played the game years ago, loved it, and want nothing more than to relive those memories. You are buying this game regardless of what anyone thinks.

If you did not, whether you never had the chance or are simply too young to have played it, then you deserve to know that the game has not aged well.

Even Beat em' ups have evolved over time, and the Simpsons game is now very primitive in pretty much every area. It is perhaps a bit more harsh than it deserves, but it isn't as if this guy went and decided to randomly pick on an old Arcade game. This game is being released on our modern consoles, it deserves to be looked at by modern standards.
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,365
3
43
Ehh...I remember playing this when I was a kid and this game was only three or four years old. And even then I thought it was crappy.
 

RoBi3.0

New member
Mar 29, 2009
709
0
0
ThatPurpleGuy said:
RoBi3.0 said:
ThatPurpleGuy said:
RoBi3.0 said:
People still take Gamespot seriously? That is what seems odd to me.
People taking any review seriously is odd to me..It always just 'one mans view' no matter how unbiased they claim they are. Also most reviewers play a game just to review it, which means at best 1 playthrough, sometimes not even that. Now to me any game worth anything won't be able to be fully 'reviewed' unless a player has put a tonne of hours into it, good games have alot of depth, which most of these reviewers wouldn't even come close to seeing with such limited time.
This has always been I opinion on the matter as well. I have always said everyone would be best served finding the game reviewer that best fits their gaming views and interests and follow that one person, and fuck the rest, cause everyone is different.

I also have a problem with assigning arbitrary number scores to game reviews, but I guess that is another topic altogether.
Ahh the number system for scores is what makes the whole review thing even worse. I read an article once somewhere and it explained that because from our schooling we are all conditioned to the fact that 50% is a pass and anything less is a complete fail. This leaves numbers 1-5 worthless as we have seen what has happened in The Simpsons game review. the 3/10 is seen as complete disaster, when really if we are grading out of 10 a 3 should be more like "playable but still below average, don't expect too much".
My problem with scores is that they are an attempt to standardize opinions. There is no way you can rate a game in such a way that 3 out of 10 (for example) mean the same to everyone. and even if you could. The opinion used in the review to get said score are so subjective that you could never come up with a criteria that would make assigning scores non-arbitrary.

For example can someone please example to me the quantifiable difference between a 9 and a 9.5?
 

Rednog

New member
Nov 3, 2008
3,567
0
0
Meh, same thing happened with Turtles in Time, people get fueled by nostalgia and are hyped up but after you've been spoiled by a generation or so of newer games going back to the primitive arcade styles its like wow how did we every find this to be amazing?
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,498
1
3
Country
United States
Eh, can't argue with the review.

I thought it was cool back in the day and sinking in a ton of quarters just to keep playing. I thought it was fun as hell.

But now? Well, if I saw it at an arcade I'd still play it, but nostalgia would be running full force while my adult self would be just disgusted by the crap game.
 

Rad Party God

Party like it's 2010!
Feb 23, 2010
3,560
0
0
Are you seriously upset that a shitty game got a shitty score?, you seriously need to take off those damned rose tinted nostalgia glasses.

The exact same thing happened with the X-Men Arcade and Turtles In Time, they were awesome back then, but today not so much, unless you like to wear those pretty rose tinted nostalgia glasses the whole time.
 

RagTagBand

New member
Jul 7, 2011
497
0
0
Bomberman4000 said:
RagTagBand said:
You can't judge a fish by it's ability to climb trees.
*slow clap*

Made me laugh. Good line.
It's a paraphrased Einstein quote, the full quote being

"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid."
 

DarkRyter

New member
Dec 15, 2008
3,077
0
0
You should write them a letter about how you don't like that they didn't like it.

You should tell them to like it more. Maybe then, they will like it.

Because that's how it woks.