Pirakahunter788 said:
I see your points. However, I do not care for graphical quality. I usually run games at the lowest quality possible even if I can play them on the highest fine. If i'm looking for visually pleasing games, I'll buy them for my PS3, since I have a top tier HD television. When it comes to my PC, it's all about FPS for me. The smoother the game runs, the better. Ya know?
A peculiar philosophy, if I do say so myself. A high-end PC can get far superior graphical performance, including frame rates, resolution, view distance, anti-aliasing and all the rest to a PS3, given that the PS3 has outdated graphics card technology and a processor architecture which is notoriously difficult to optimise for. If I had a top-tier television, I'd be plugging my desktop into it to get the best graphical performance that I could.
Again, though, even if you're looking for the lowest quality possible,
ARMA 2 still requires a hefty graphics card, beyond that of what a prebuilt desktop or laptop typically comes with for $500. Increase your budget by about $100, and we might be getting somewhere; until then, you'd be stuck with Intel dedicated graphics, which suck.