Well it isn't, it may be for you but that's not the case for the majority of people.Fagotto said:[..]it should be about as controversial and political as heterosexuality.[..]
The sexuality shown is the most common in a kid's life, a mother and a father - heterosexual couple. And yeah sexuality wasn't always shown, remember that Donald Duck's nephews never had parents, it was all uncas and nephews in that universe. In fact there is a quite interesting analysis (among others) in How to read Donald Duck by Ariel Dorfman and Armand Mattelart.And sexuality is already shown. Or are you for removing all crushes, married pairs etc?
Anytime the OP is about homosexuality you can expect 14 pages at the least. It is (for some reason) still a very touchy subject.Nimcha said:I can't believe this is still going!
In my experience, this is largely because even including the phrase homosexual in a post will insult everybody of whatever sexuality, often for incredibly convoluted and senseless reasons.RedEyesBlackGamer said:Anytime the OP is about homosexuality you can expect 14 pages at the least. It is (for some reason) still a very touchy subject.Nimcha said:I can't believe this is still going!
FarleShadow said:Caught this bit and made me laugh, you do know that the last world war gave us computers (Breaking the Engima code), space travel(V2 rockets)and a host of other technologies?EuZic said:*snip*
Violence against each other, while excusable between animals and the "survival of the fittest" concept, is very blamable. It keeps us from moving forward.
I did read the first post, sorry if my elaboration was lacking.Captain Pooptits said:Pretty much the opposite of what we're going for here... did you even read the first post? i mean i can understand not reading all 26 fking pages....bushwhacker2k said:YES. Because I know it's going to be a flamboyantly gay character meant to make toddlers laugh rather than a step in the direction of being open-minded.A Weary Exile said:-Does the idea of including more or any gay characters in a show targeted at younger audiences bother you? Reasons for why or why not?
As odd as it may sound, there are beliefs that violence stimulates human instincts and causes us to reach greater heights. Maybe not just beating people with a blunt object, but competitively speaking.EuZic said:And I can't believe I just explained why violence is wrong.
I don't know what friendship is magic is, but I know cartoons like Batman (especially the '90s one) were no strangers to mature themes and it's definitely possible for cartoons like thus.Captain Pooptits said:I can agree with that. Spongebob is a comedy cartoon, an extremely silly one at that. None of the characters are capable of being taken seriously.bushwhacker2k said:When I think cartoons, I think Spongebob, and no way could a good gay character exist in that. Maybe I just don't see the good cartoons, but I just don't see them as being educational or promoting positive role-models. We can hope for things and ask for them but getting them is a different matter entirely.
On the other hand, in anime it's a possibility, and I always support open-mindedness.
In anime, I'd say it's more than just a possibility. I believe it's already happened. Azumangah Daioh and Card Captor Sakura feature sympathetic and relatable lesbian characters. Lucky Star and K-On! toy with the idea of girl-on-girl crushes and make them look acceptable to the viewer.
Many cartoons these days take a lot of pointers from anime. Many claim that this is a bad thing, but the first animes were originally inspired by western cartoons so I see no reason why merging the two styles again is such a bad idea.
How would you feel about featuring same sex relationships in cartoons which combine these two forms of animation and story building? Examples include Teen Titans, Friendship is Magic, Batman Beyond... etc
Squidward definitley, Spongebob just has ADHD.Doctor Glocktor said:Isn't Spongebob gay?
Friendship is Magic is the new My Little Pony show that is quite popular with some people on the Escapist and the rest of the internet (including me).bushwhacker2k said:I don't know what friendship is magic is, but I know cartoons like Batman (especially the '90s one) were no strangers to mature themes and it's definitely possible for cartoons like thus.Captain Pooptits said:I can agree with that. Spongebob is a comedy cartoon, an extremely silly one at that. None of the characters are capable of being taken seriously.bushwhacker2k said:When I think cartoons, I think Spongebob, and no way could a good gay character exist in that. Maybe I just don't see the good cartoons, but I just don't see them as being educational or promoting positive role-models. We can hope for things and ask for them but getting them is a different matter entirely.
On the other hand, in anime it's a possibility, and I always support open-mindedness.
In anime, I'd say it's more than just a possibility. I believe it's already happened. Azumangah Daioh and Card Captor Sakura feature sympathetic and relatable lesbian characters. Lucky Star and K-On! toy with the idea of girl-on-girl crushes and make them look acceptable to the viewer.
Many cartoons these days take a lot of pointers from anime. Many claim that this is a bad thing, but the first animes were originally inspired by western cartoons so I see no reason why merging the two styles again is such a bad idea.
How would you feel about featuring same sex relationships in cartoons which combine these two forms of animation and story building? Examples include Teen Titans, Friendship is Magic, Batman Beyond... etc
So are you saying that people who don't believe that homosexuality is as controversial or/and political as heterosexuality are automatically bigoted? That's a very biased opinion my friend and it is very arrogant of you to call the majority of people bigots just because they happen to have a different opinion than yours.Elcarsh said:True, true. But, I have only two words to say about those people; fuck 'em!AWAR said:Well it isn't, it may be for you but that's not the case for the majority of people.
Bigoted pricks should be whipped, metaphorically speaking, not bowed down to. Bigotry against homosexuals is a wrong that needs to be righted, and it sure as hell will be, whether some people want it or not.