Lord Monocle Von Banworthy said:
Thank you for proving my point. You used a physical description to tell me what kind of girl you're attracted to. Had you said you were attracted to girls who understand C++ I'd've been sunk.
I'm not going to tell you you're wrong because we're not in dispute. I didn't exactly throw my hat over the wall in asserting a particular shape as most attractive up there did I? I wasn't saying that everybody is attracted to the same things, just that initial attractiveness is usually on the physical plane. With someone you don't know in person but only see on the internet or in other entertainment media that attraction exists entirely on the physical plane.
I think it was comedian Pablo Francisco who once said, "Nobody ever says, 'Ooh, there's an ugly person! Let's meet her!'" In other words you're not even going to get close enough to the girl you don't find physically attractive to bother finding out what's on the inside. I know our culture condemns that, but it's still true.
Look at the straw man people keep throwing up on this thread even. "I'm not attracted to the orange, plastic-breasted, peroxide blonde..." Yeah? Good. Nobody is. Those aren't attractive women to the average man at all. They're a caricature of attractiveness.
I still stand by my basic guidelines: We're all attracted to health and symmetry. We're programmed for it because those things indicate good genes and the ability to bear healthy children to term. After we've narrowed the field according to whatever our personal standards for those criteria are we can start looking at shared interests and whatnot.
Oh, and everybody be prepared to see me live up to my name. Apparently I was reported to a mod or however this sort of thing works for not agreeing with the OP. Do you feel "flamed," Longshot?