GunsmithKitten said:
Yea, uh, I'll act different when feminine attitudes, outlooks and activities are rewarded equally in society, as right now they are most certainly not. Till then, I'm acting the way humankind does, and always, rewarded.
I'll admit, I was half tempted to make a snide remark, but you tickled my brain in such an odd way... (spring board!)
Could it be that perhaps the socially constructed gender roles are a mere means to perceivable rewards one desires in our society? In that an action or choice has specific rewards and consequences, and it's mere jealously that creates the opposition to roles which people have been provided with that don't net the same value of reward? So it's not even a matter of freeing the sexes to pursue whatever path they might choose (which actually has already occurred), but the simple fact that someone selfishly wants the same level of reward that another obtains for differing paths?
What is a feminine attitude, outlook and/or activity? In what way does it get rewarded? What is a masculine attitude, outlook and/or activity? In what way does it get rewarded? Are the two inherently equal in nature; whether skill, experience, effort, risk and/or outcome? Should they receive the same rewards? How does one place value on the rewards in with either the feminine or the masculine obtain through their attitudes and activities?
How odd, I've already thought of how this applies to the wage gap myth, and various acceptance movements. Does plain old greed really permeate the ideologies of gender advocacy to such a fundamental degree? I certainly knew it did from a political perspectives in the form of entitlements, but I thought socially it was about acceptance, not reward.
Fuck, I need to deliberate this more. How such a simple statement has confounded me! I'm going to need a drink, this might take a little while.