Gene Simmons Declares War on Anonymous

Recommended Videos

Necromancer1991

New member
Apr 9, 2010
805
0
0
"We are currently in the process of back-tracing you and reporting you to the cyber-police, and consequences will never be the same!", really you get pissed because someone hit you with a low orbit ion cannon, you make threats and get a backlash, WTF were you expecting, chocolates and flowers?
 

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
Space Jawa said:
I have to say, that's a rather...interesting theory on what's at the root of the current economic crisis.
America's chief export, by a very large margin, is intellectual property - software, music, movies, games, etc. Half the world either doesn't buy this stuff or pirates the hell out of it. That's why the current administration has made digital copyright law such an enormous priority; they recognize that 1s and 0s aren't going to prop up our economy if no one's buying them. Personally, I don't think they should.

Though I'm pretty sure that most the art we have these days is due to people being able to make a profit off of it. So yeah, "Art" can be a job. Or rather, a career.
And yet a sizable portion of the most compelling and important art throughout history was produced by poor men and women who were simply passionate about their work. The idea that money drives everything, including man's very ancient desire to create and innovate, seems insulting. I know I'm offended, but then again, I don't do everything for the promise of a cookie.

If someone wants to make a piece of art in their spare time and give it away for free, they are perfectly entitled to do so. But that doesn't mean an artist should always be expected to do their work with 0 expectation of possible compensation. Especially if it's something that would be far too big to accomplish if they had a paying job to worry about on the side.
The dirty little secret, in this case, is that we are all artists. Yes, some projects require full attention, and that's what gives birth to the career aritst. But that's a mark you have to earn for yourself. It shouldn't be gifted to you based on the time you spend or the choices you make, necessarily. And you shouldn't be entitlted to some ridiculously extravagent lifestyle for your trouble. Although, digressing once more, the tolerance of such extravagence is just another reason why we're in this economic mess.
 

Communist partisan

New member
Jan 24, 2009
1,858
0
0
I stick to anon on this one but I yust wanna see how it goes, Simmons is right, but how would we.... I yust better shut up i stick to anon and thats 'nuff said...
 

Xanthious

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,273
0
0
. . . and in related news I have declared war on the entire continent of Asia. I expect Gene and I will be met with similar end results. Well wait scratch that, I will probably come out better than he will in the end.
 

The Rockerfly

New member
Dec 31, 2008
4,649
0
0
I know who I will be rooting for

This is going to be one hell of a fight

EDIT: the site might be up again but it's slow as hell and looks like there are serious problems

That was one attack...
 

hem dazon 90

New member
Aug 12, 2008
837
0
0
derelix said:
hem dazon 90 said:
Oh we are sooo scared of the aging rock star!


lol prepare for a backraid anons.
Funny coming from somebody that's acting like an excited fan girl over a few nerds with no lives that get enjoyment out of internet bullying.
You make all of them look bad ass by comparasin. That's just sad considering the subjects in this "fight"

But lets hear some of your poetry or anything you have created. I bet it's way more popular than anything that band did. What was it called again? Kiss? Yeah I bet they were some go nowhere band that nobody remembers or paints their faces to resemble.

"bullying"? Almost all of anon's targets are people who deserve it breda.
 

Bruin

New member
Aug 16, 2010
340
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Bruin said:
And personal like does?
I don't see how like or dislike enters into it. Gene may or may not be a douche (and for the record, I think his "sue them until they die" stance is outdated and wrongheaded) but Kiss is one of the most noteworthy and significant acts in the history of rock and roll. Are they "relevant" now? Of course not. Nor are the Stones, the Who, Van Halen, AC/DC, Ozzy, Cheap Trick, etc etc ad nauseum. But that in no way diminishes their accomplishments or their importance, and it's silly to suggest that the legacy of Kiss is somehow tarnished because Gene Simmons turned out to be kind of an asshole.
Again, their accomplishments are something we all have different views about.

You may call being a mass-puppeteer of the ear, moving the marionette's hands to their pockets and funneling the gained cash directly into your own as an accomplishment but honestly I don't see it as anything to be proud of. Quite honestly it sounds more like robbing to me. Taking a musically-starved ear and giving it generic sound rather than something worth listening to.

The majority of musicians these days don't play for themselves, anyway, they do it for the money. It's the rock star image they seek; after the while the instrument is just a medium they use to get from A (Without money) to B (With money). Lady Gaga, Kanye West, Nickelback, Little Wayne, Taylor Swift...the whole gang of rock, pop and rap trash that's taken over the industry since it became an industry.

I don't denounce the fact that KISS has been successful. I think it's sad that Gene Simmons thinks his word has sway over thousands of people he doesn't even know or that he has the power to command the FBI around or any other silly, face-painting-involved ritual, rite or function he thinks he can do.
 

blindthrall

New member
Oct 14, 2009
1,151
0
0
Legion said:
blindthrall said:
Legion said:
Arec Balrin said:
Legion said:
Good luck to him. I am getting sick of this "Don't mess with Anonymous" fear that so many people seem to feel.
You name makes this ironic.
Anonymous didn't invent the word, nor motto. They borrowed it as I did, so I disagree.

The fact that the name and phrase is from The Bible, and Anonymous are generally seen as an Atheist group, now that's irony.
I think your name is ironic because it's something The Many would use, but you have SHODAN as an avatar.
A very good point, although I can't think of an awesome SHODAN quote that is short enough to fit.
Well if your ego can handle it, I'd go with "A pathetic creature of meat and bone."

EDIT: Nevermind, you got one. OT, fuck Gene Simmons. I hate KISS.
 

Gilhelmi

The One Who Protects
Oct 22, 2009
1,480
0
0
HEEEHHEEEHEHHAAAAAAWWWHWHAHAAHAEHEHAHHAEAHHAEHEAHEAHHEAHAHHEQHAEH. YeS LEt uS dESTrOy thEM.

Forced myself too be at peace. Yes, let us go after these filthy law breakers. Let us burn down their websites, let us burn down their (Internet) hiding places, let us bust down their real-world doors and haul their a**es too jail. LET ALL WHO UNJUSTLY HACK FEEL THE MIGHTY HAND OF THE LAW. (I know a little overly dramatic but I do hope and pray that they go too jail and learn too respect the law)
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
When you fight the internet... everyone loses. I'll see how this turns out but I expect that in the end its going to be a wash where everyone loses a bit.
 

Travis Higuet

New member
May 19, 2010
47
0
0
Socken said:
Travis Higuet said:
huge wall of quotes
Actually, nevermind. I was just halfway through repeating what I said again and then I realised that you won't get what I'm trying to say anyway. I don't know why your response was so hostile when I never disagreed with anything you said in the first place. Perhaps you lack the "mental fortitude" to understand that.

Suffice it to say that you totally missed my point and I never said anything about whether I think downloading music is ok or not. Simply put: "Losses" is the wrong word. Actually, there. That's my point. Yes, it's irrelevant to "the discussion" but I don't recall participating in whatever discussion you're apparently in anyway. You just keep misinterpreting my every post and frankly, I don't see a reason to keep justifying myself here.
My apologies for becoming irritated with you, and letting it show in my response. I became that way when your response started out by telling me that you only read the first sentence of my post, but still considered yourself informed enough about my position to rattle off your own list of reasons why you thought I was wrong, most of which were refuted in the other post, that you couldn't be bothered to read. I'm also sorry that you don't understand the definition of the word "discussion" since you've been involved in one from the moment you first responded to my post, and somehow failed to realize it. And finally, you have my most sincere apologies for misinterpreting your every post (which apparently weren't part of the discussion that we weren't having).

My position has been from the start that being a thief does have, and should have, consequences. I tried to bolster this position by clarifying that theft of intellectual property, or art, is in fact no different than theft of a physical object like a tv, or a laptop. If you disagree, then you are simply wrong, not only in my opinion, but in the opinion of the court system of the United States of America. Sorry that we couldn't have this nonexistent discussion in a more friendly way, but such is life. Hope you have a good day anyways.
 

JordanMillward_1

New member
May 19, 2009
263
0
0
Well, I look forward to seeing how Anon beat Gene to death digitally and graphically violate the corpse. It should be quite a show!