Gene Simmons Declares War on Anonymous

Recommended Videos

fgdfgdgd

New member
May 9, 2009
692
0
0
Azaraxzealot said:
finally... someone's sticking up to these internet terrorists.

and im glad its Gene Simmons \m/ YEAH! ROCKERS DON'T TAKE THIS SHIT!
Thanks for the Fox News edition there, coming up next: How communism was the "terrorism" of the 50's.
 

DazBurger

New member
May 22, 2009
1,339
0
0
So Anonymous have moved away from fighting Scientology to bash people who believes that thief's should be punished.
With this plus the numerous death-threats made to people who disagree with them, im out.
No more protesting, afros nor pool-closing for me, this is just too much.

What happened too the wise words of The Wise Beard Man? Are they forgotten? Or just ignored?


Anyways, no more for me, Im sure I wont be missed.
 

Torrasque

New member
Aug 6, 2010
3,441
0
0
GrinningManiac said:
Good

I don't expect him to succeed, but I'll bet that it'll attract the attention of bigger people. He says the FBI are invovled, which may or may not be true.

It irritates me that a huge throng of annoying little kids and lonely 20/30-somethings think they're like frickin' Al Capone or something. I don't care for Piracy legislation either way, but I want these f*ckless morons to be shown that the real world is REAL and they aren't the most important and untouchable 'criminal masterminds' (/sarcasm) in the world
The key thing with Anonymous is that they prove faceless masses can do anything they put their minds to.
So far, they have proved that several times.
I'm just glad Anon in general has a conscience, or they would be truly frightening.

You have to remember that even though they are "untoucheable", they know that they are not.
 

King Toasty

New member
Oct 2, 2010
1,527
0
0
Holy shit, this is awesome. KISS vs. The Internet!
Like a dream come true.


Hold on a sec.
"Print their names and pictures"?!
WHAT.
Isn't that like, totally illegal AND dangerous?
No wonder Anonymous hates you.
 

The Long Road

New member
Sep 3, 2010
189
0
0
In other news, the United States is still hunting terrorists in Afghanistan nine years later.

Seriously, it's the same thing. He has incredible might behind him, but anon can hide all over the internet. The idiots might get caught, but the smart ones can bounce their IP all over the world and either become untraceable or make tracing them so complicated and difficult that they won't bother. And that's if he gets the legal grounds to trace them, which is a dubious proposition at the very best.

Personally, I want to see Anonymous sap him of lots of money and energy before he finally throws up his hands and gives up. I think Gene Simmons is head and shoulders better than most in the entertainment business, but anyone who declares war on Anonymous is basically chewing on the business end of a shotgun. Anon FTW.
 

RobCoxxy

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,036
0
0
Yeah. Sue University students and take all their cars and houses and money.

Because they can afford them, right? ¬_¬
 

fullbleed

New member
Apr 30, 2008
765
0
0
Neither side is in the right really. I don't really like it when someone gets sued for thousands for downloading peggle. Although I am leaning towards Gene Simmons, because I am sick and fucking tired of people who act like it's their human right to pirate people's work and think they're entitled to everything for free! News flash, you're not! Things cost money, get over it!

 

deckai

New member
Oct 26, 2009
280
0
0
To be honest, although I'm against random acts of destruction, in this case I'm on Anons side. Artists have the right to protect their work, as everyone else. But there is a limit to greed...
 

zidine100

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,016
0
0
FaceFaceFace said:
That's the common way of looking at it, but I've never agreed with that. I know my view isn't widely shared so I'm not trying to call you wrong or anything, but:
Would you ever steal a candy bar? I wouldn't. Why? Stealing is wrong. Sure, all "bad" things are excusable in certain situations, but I think we can agree that stealing a candy bar has to be the result of a simple disregard for law and/or moral values. Taking what is not yours without good reason is wrong. In other words, those who would commit crimes are fundamentally different from ordinary people, and common thieves are closer to murderers than to regular human beings.

If that's not convincing, how about this simple idea. How many people's lives would be ruined if that was the penalty for stealing a candy bar? Probably none, because no one would steal a candy bar if the punishment was that bad. If the punishment fits the crime, people are more willing to commit the crime. It's like opportunity cost in economics. When the US government raised safety requirements in cars, people in general started driving faster and pedestrian deaths increased. If the risks of an action, ie stealing a candy bar, are huge, then no one will take the risk. If every crime was punishable by death, only the stupidist or most insane would actually commit crimes.
you ever been or used youtube, im quite sure fair use will not protect you. Im assuming you have as most of the internet as we know it has been there and listened to music at least once.

edit sorry reread your post

so j walking should equal death eh?
littering should equal death?

i get what your saying here but you do see why this isnt the case... right?

And i really dont care which side wins as it stands, its not going to change all that much anyway if either side wins.

I think the old saying goes Stuck between a rock and a hard place.
 

LocoRocoPandaCookie

New member
Sep 27, 2010
45
0
0
Isn't this just a flame war gone out of hand? This anon stuff seems really childish to me but then again so does Gene Simmons. Once something like lawsuits and FBI gets involved isn't this just a prank that went overboard?

This man has more money than sense and more stuff at his disposal. It'll be fun to watch how all this pans out :)
 

Torrasque

New member
Aug 6, 2010
3,441
0
0
The Long Road said:
In other news, the United States is still hunting terrorists in Afghanistan nine years later.

Seriously, it's the same thing. He has incredible might behind him, but anon can hide all over the internet. The idiots might get caught, but the smart ones can bounce their IP all over the world and either become untraceable or make tracing them so complicated and difficult that they won't bother. And that's if he gets the legal grounds to trace them, which is a dubious proposition at the very best.

Personally, I want to see Anonymous sap him of lots of money and energy before he finally throws up his hands and gives up. I think Gene Simmons is head and shoulders better than most in the entertainment business, but anyone who declares war on Anonymous is basically chewing on the business end of a shotgun. Anon FTW.
^

The funny thing is he thinks he is going after a set number of people.
Pretty sure if he knew what Anon was, he'd re-think his words.

"I don't like water! I am going to fight water!"
'?have you seen the ocean?'
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
I read the title, and it started off as a chuckle, but evolved into full out laughter.

This man is nuts.
 

xXDeMoNiCXx

New member
Mar 10, 2010
312
0
0
Anonymous is a coward who hides behind a computer screen, thinks he's a bigshot and goes out of his way to hack anyone who disagrees with him in the slightest cause it makes his imaginary balls fell big. I will personally laugh when this poser finally gets brought down, I don't care who does it either.
 

Mordwyl

New member
Feb 5, 2009
1,302
0
0
Says the man whose son blatantly plagiarised one of the trinity manga for his own.