Value decay is largely irrelevant to the point, because even after value decay, that 10 year old, 90% discounted, item still makes companies money, whereas trading digital games doesn't.Richard Allen said:people keep on saying that as if the value doesn't decay as with every other product known to man kind. Would you spend $50 dollars on a 10 year old game. No, doesn't matter if it is digital or not.
Still love it when people use "the corporations are not making enuf" argument. Mind baffling.
And I love it when people ignore things like
A. Video game development costs are, and have been, skyrocketing year after year.
B. Video game companies hardly make enough money to payback the multi-million of dollars needed to make a game in the first place. Which is why most companies only produce sequels to established IPs like CoD, because its the only thing they know will be able to get them their money back.
C. There have been more video game companies closing in the last 3-5 years then the last decade before it, showing just how bad of a state video game companies are in, despite all of the supposed "MASSIEVE PROFETS" people claim they are making.
People love to only look at how much video game companies make from a game, while totally ignoring how much they actually made after they pay back everything the spent to make the product in the first place.