Happyninja42 said:
Loonyyy said:
I'm guessing the background research for this article was mostly Spiderman 2.
Thanks for a headline in a "science" section that casts doubt on, and creates fear, about science.
Oh please, this is nothing compared to what they used to put up. This is a fair and balanced presentation of the information about the article. There wasn't a single mention of any pop culture evil scientists, or the borg, or any of the other things they usually reference to imply doom and gloom.
No, it just reproduced the fears about the LHC (Unfounded), referred to Nuclear fusion as "Capturing a sun", which I hope to god was a Spiderman reference, otherwise no, it's a similar reaction, but that is not how suns work. It then says it is making a sun, which it is not, it's reproducing the fusion reaction of a sun, it's like saying that my car's motor is "Capturing" a Fuel Air Bomb. Also, stellar means star, not sun, and that matters because a sun is distinct from a star (Before someone tries calling me an idiot for that, all suns are stars, not all stars are suns, and the only people who would refer to this as the power of the sun are being poetic, not scientifically rigorous).
To argue with the article more, as the article itself has pointed out, such devices HAVE been proven to work, they're just not sustainable, and they don't produce significant power, because the fundamental problem is plasma containment. The plasma can't contact the apparatus, and must be magnetically contained, if containment fails, the plasma cools, and can't perform the fusion reaction. Which is exactly why they built this.
It's not the worst Escapist science article, but the only context in which is can be regarded as a good report on current science is in comparison to the other Escapist science articles. At least this one has some basic information, doesn't bury the lede with how cute a tardigrade is, and they googled what a Torus is, which is fun. They brought up Mobius strips for some reason though, so I'm taking off points there. If it's got an even number of twists, it's no longer a Mobius strip. A Mobius strip is interesting because it's a one sided shape, and in the field of topology, it can be used as a fundamental shape to construct other shapes, along with IIRC, a sphere. It's not because it's a twisted loop.
But hey, that's only nitpicking the article (Because it's very short on sources).
People who actually know the story have pointed out:
McKitten said:
Gethsemani said:
It doesn't contain or harvest a star. It mimics and contains the chain reaction that continually takes place within stars. There's a world of difference between the two.
It doesn't do that either. W7-X ist not a fusion reactor, it is a plasma containment test device. There will never be any fusion done with it, the point is to test if the stellarator design can efficiently contain plasma. To test that, they create plasma with microwaves and then observe how well the containment field does. If this one works out and the containment field works well enough (and long enough) the next prototype will probably be build with actual fusion in mind.
The reason why this isn't a fusion reactor is that it's far easier and cheaper to test the containment with "artifically" created plasma. No need for radiation shielding, no need for deuterium, etc. And since the biggest challenge of fusion is containing the plasma, not starting fusion, it makes sense to do the research separately.
If you check the actual guys behind the reactor (Who don't get cited here. The citations lead us to two reports based on a Science Magazine interview with some of the people involved: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/350/6259/369.full [It's a pretty good read, and has a lot of information] and the Business Insider one isn't very good either, and there is some obvious plagiarism occurring, which the editor should have caught), the Max Planck Institute (You know, basic Journalistic due diligence, or what they expect of you writing a high school essay, using primary sources), you'll see that this is true. They intend to use the stellarotor to test containment for continuous operation. It is not being used as a reactor. The headline is misleading, the entire article is. They used a microwave pulse to create helium plasma to test the magnetic fields. This is following their electron beam testing to ensure that the magnetic fields are forming as designed (Which is where the supercomputer comes in. Studying Magnetic Fields is basically performing advanced vector calculus in 3-D, and it's likely something that your local University's Maths department has some experience in). They plan to move onto Hydrogen plasma testing, the purpose of the device, next year.
Nowhere do they mention power generation, because tokomaks have shown that we can generate power through nuclear fusion, it's just that containment can't break 7 minutes, and that means that it takes more power to heat the plasma and contain it than you get out, while they're hoping to get around half an hour with the W7-X, which would be a massive, wordlchanging breakthrough, however, the design is a mess to construct, which has so far hampered testing, until now, which is why this is so groundbreaking. This is a fantastic engineering achievement, and it's being buried underneath a bit of doomsaying, a bit of advanced geometry, and a brief history of nuclear fusion (With errors). They used supercomputers to perform advanced calculus to simulate complicated magnetic fields to contain plasma, and whatever software they used (I'm sure that's very interesting too, I'd love to read about it, simulating physics is awesome, and it's fun watching what you can do with fields and calculus in MATLAB alone) allowed them to design a machine capable of doing it, and they built it. It's an engineering marvel, and yeah, it's beautiful as hell, because of exactly what it is, and what it's designed to do.
It deserves better.