Aidinthel said:
ChildofGallifrey said:
He may have kept that in mind, because he never referred to it as "an American colony" (that I recall, at least).
From that article: "He also proclaimed that the "weirdest thing" he ever did in Congress was to introduce a "Northwest Ordinance for space" that would allow a moon colony to become a state once 13,000 lived there." A moon colony becoming a US state would pretty clearly violate the treaty.
Regarding the expense of such a project, obviously I don't have any numbers about it in front of me but I do know that NASA's previous operations were never a major percentage of the national budget. Compared to the amount of money tossed at, say, farm subsidies or those Bush tax cuts that refuse to die it was a drop in the bucket. In addition, NASA's research actually provided a net gain to the economy. I think another inspiring project like this could be a very good thing for the country. I just wish it wasn't a Republican saying it.
I missed that part (though, admittedly, I only skimmed the article). It probably wouldn't be allowed to come to pass, given that precedent. Like you mentioned earlier, it would probably be run in the same manner as the International Space Station (which I think would be much better, all things considered).
This would probably require a larger financial investment solely on the fact that it would be planned as a permanent (I'm assuming) living facility, rather than an operation like a shuttle/satellite launch. The start-up capital, the cost of maintaining and the cost of supplies (though I'd imagine they would set up some kind of renewable hydroponic garden or some such when they got up there); it would probably end up costing a pretty penny. Though, as you say, it would boost morale greatly, as incredibly ambitious projects tend to do. Based on the scope of the undertaking, it would also create a fair number of jobs as well, mostly mechanical and engineering I'd imagine.
I don't particularly care about his political affiliation (I'm technically a Republican myself, though I vote for whoever I agree with the most, partisan lines be damned), I just think it's a crazy campaign promise to make. I'm absolutely 100% behind it if people more intelligent than I say it's feasible. Any step that gets us closer to living in
Star Trek (that doesn't involve radically altering your living space, like that one chap from an earlier news post) is A+ material in my book.