Very ironic satire. She's trying to turn all of the friendzone posts on their collective head, but she's also fueling the argument that men and women are rarely ever "just friends".
The "friendzone" is simply a more recent and specific descriptor for the age-old problem of not getting what you want, and it happens to everyone. Why won't he date me? I'm in the fuckbuddyzone. Why won't he marry me? I'm in the girlfriendzone. Why can't I get a promotion? I'm in the middlemanagementzone. Why won't she date me? I'm in the friendzone.
If the fuckbuddy no longer wants to have sex, does that mean she didn't enjoy it? If the girlfriend dumps you, does that mean she didn't love you? If the middle manager quits, does that mean she hated her job?
If the friend stops being your friend, does that mean he only wanted to get into your pants?
This backlash against the "friendzone" concept, this notion that guys see themselves as entitled and sulk away like babies whenever they don't get their way in a relationship... it's reductive of the human condition. Everyone feels entitled in some sense at some point regarding some thing. We are willful creatures seeking pleasure. A lot of people riding the "death to friendzone" train come off as hypocritical because the underlying attitude seems to be one of exemption from the lowly desires that clearly define our species.
Edit: I found this response in the comments section of the linked post. It illustrates precisely the sort of thing I'm talking about.
"She's not complaining about being propositioned by friends; she's complaining that they suddenly stop being friends when she says no. Which means they were only ever pretending to be friends to get sex.
Yes, it's possible to be intimate with friends. But if a guy can't take no for an answer... then he was a lying douchebag all along, he was never a friend, and the woman has every right to complain about what a jackass he is."
This is idiotic. Every interaction you've had with this man, every joke and meal you shared, every experience, isn't suddenly invalidated because he responds to your rejection with distance. Expecting a person who is emotionally hurt to maintain the exact same level of affection and attention is myopic bordering on masochistic. Maybe he did only want sex. Maybe he can't be around you without stirring up painful emotions. How could you tell the difference? Seems like something you'd have to, you know, ask him.
The "friendzone" is simply a more recent and specific descriptor for the age-old problem of not getting what you want, and it happens to everyone. Why won't he date me? I'm in the fuckbuddyzone. Why won't he marry me? I'm in the girlfriendzone. Why can't I get a promotion? I'm in the middlemanagementzone. Why won't she date me? I'm in the friendzone.
If the fuckbuddy no longer wants to have sex, does that mean she didn't enjoy it? If the girlfriend dumps you, does that mean she didn't love you? If the middle manager quits, does that mean she hated her job?
If the friend stops being your friend, does that mean he only wanted to get into your pants?
This backlash against the "friendzone" concept, this notion that guys see themselves as entitled and sulk away like babies whenever they don't get their way in a relationship... it's reductive of the human condition. Everyone feels entitled in some sense at some point regarding some thing. We are willful creatures seeking pleasure. A lot of people riding the "death to friendzone" train come off as hypocritical because the underlying attitude seems to be one of exemption from the lowly desires that clearly define our species.
Edit: I found this response in the comments section of the linked post. It illustrates precisely the sort of thing I'm talking about.
"She's not complaining about being propositioned by friends; she's complaining that they suddenly stop being friends when she says no. Which means they were only ever pretending to be friends to get sex.
Yes, it's possible to be intimate with friends. But if a guy can't take no for an answer... then he was a lying douchebag all along, he was never a friend, and the woman has every right to complain about what a jackass he is."
This is idiotic. Every interaction you've had with this man, every joke and meal you shared, every experience, isn't suddenly invalidated because he responds to your rejection with distance. Expecting a person who is emotionally hurt to maintain the exact same level of affection and attention is myopic bordering on masochistic. Maybe he did only want sex. Maybe he can't be around you without stirring up painful emotions. How could you tell the difference? Seems like something you'd have to, you know, ask him.