It may not be an 'official' award but it will still damage their reputation even further than it currently is. Shareholders see the title "EA worst company in America" on several blogs and that might be enough to convince them to sell, sell, sell!DrVornoff said:Ah, thank you, someone else who gets it.
On a side note, that worst company award doesn't mean much because it was voted on in a niche magazine, not by actual industry analysts or entrepreneurs or economists. And I have a hard time believing they're worse than Bank of America who crashed the US economy by selling toxic mortgages and then betting on them to fail. And since that is objectively criminal, they paid off politicians and an armada of lawyers to keep them out of prison. That's just sick.
EA did deserve winning that award but not because it's a more destructive company than say: a national bank. But let's face it, if Bank of America won that award who would even be talking about it? Maybe one or two people, but it wouldn't exactly do anything.
EA doesn't have the backing of the American government and almost every millionaire/billionaire/politian in the country, unlike the banks. It won't ruin the company by getting a golden poo, not by a long shot. But I'm certain it will do more damage than some of those more deserving trophy winners.