Colour-Scientist said:
4173 said:
No. The point of mentioning rich and attractive is that they are in direct contrast to negative nerd stereotypes (500 lbs., mother's basement etc.). So the problem lies in BEING nerdy, not in any particular consequence or result of being nerdy.
His worth as a date wasn't diminished because he had a hobby she didn't share, but because the hobby is inherently objectionable. And SO objectionable, that it outweighs other, positive surface traits like attractiveness or wealth. In fact, it is SOOOOO objectionable, he deserves to be publicly shamed.
I wonder if maybe she wants him to wear a big, scarlet N on his clothes.
When you're world champion it's a bit more than a casual hobby, to be fair. I probably wouldn't go for someone who was ridiculously into sport. She said he brought her to a one man show about the Black Dahlia, which isn't a good first date choice and people have snubbed dates over less.
He hasn't been reigning World Champion for a decade, and at the time playing was at least partly a job as well. I don't want to be more specific than that, because I just don't know, nor do I know how his current involvement compares to before.
Regardless, if she has any reason besides prejudice to think playing would preclude him being able to participate in a relationship, she doesn't include or even hint at it in the article. She went to all this trouble to make fun of him, I'd think she would want to include how much nerdy time the nerd spends being nerdy.
And again, since he showed up fit, groomed and employed, that all points to some ability to balance card games and other responsibilities and aspects of life.
I agree, that does seem a peculiar choice for a first date, but it is seemingly unrelated to being MtG world champion. And it barely rates a mention in the article.
[sarcasm on] My blind date might be a serial killer, but the deal-breaker is he was World Champion of a nerdy card game. [/sarcasm off]