Glaring plot holes in games
- Thread starter subject_87
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Why there were even thermal clips at all considering the previous alternative was INFINITE AMMUNITION CAPACITY WITH UPGRADES THAT POTENTIALLY DAMPEN HEAT FASTER THAN IT CAN BUILD. I really hope they go back to the me1 guns for me3.Fr said:
2.) It's not a character design; Weaver losing his eye is a part of the plot. And in the 1960s, you'd be thrown out of the military for much lesser injuries. Missing an eye is a flat out disability and a severe hindrance for aiming a weapon (a skill that comes in mighty handy while fighting a war).Korten12 said:
3.) The boat was in Cuba when you first see it. When you see it again, it's still in Cuba.
4.) See numero seven. [http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-top-7-awful-fake-accents/a-2010112910717643040]
5.) The Call of Duty games have always been rooted in realism though (save for World at War and Black Ops).
I was looking for something to do for an hour, thank you. Something tells me I'm going to regret watching this....Saintcole said:
Yeah they used to, even Infinity Ward said during the development of MW2 that they strived for Hollywood-like.soren7550 said:
also back on 2, they're Black Operatives, so that could have had an effect onto why.
3. It was in cuba, last time I checked and from what I saw, the ship was quite a way, near Cuba, but not on the dock like it was the first time.
4. Voice actors fault.
Building on from the OP: How would they add a morality core? Isn't everyone dead from the first neurotoxin flood?
The end to Pokemon Mystery Dungeon 1
Why the fuck did they:
A. Erase my memory
B. Turn me into a pokemon
C. Tell me nothing about my objective
When my job was to TELL SOMEONE to fire a hyperbeam at a meteor.
The 2nd one (Explorers of time) was such a masterpiece.......
Why the fuck did they:
A. Erase my memory
B. Turn me into a pokemon
C. Tell me nothing about my objective
When my job was to TELL SOMEONE to fire a hyperbeam at a meteor.
The 2nd one (Explorers of time) was such a masterpiece.......
MasochisticMuse said:
The problem here is that the theme of the game is the death of the Old West. Or, should I say, A theme is the death of the Old West. The game even advertised itself with the line "Outlaws to the End," Which turns out to be exactly what it says on the tin.
By the end, Marston makes peace with the fact that he cannot keep running. That no matter where he goes or what he does, he's inexorably tied to the lawmen who are on his ass. The fact that he's armed to the teeth might mean he could fight them off today, but the end result is that there would be more. And more.
And while I may personally be interpreting this part, that endangers his wife and son. We know John doesn't want this kind of life for his son, so one could look at this as an attempt to make sure he doesn't grow up like Daddy. Which, of course, fails, but that's another story.
By the end, Marston makes peace with the fact that he cannot keep running. That no matter where he goes or what he does, he's inexorably tied to the lawmen who are on his ass. The fact that he's armed to the teeth might mean he could fight them off today, but the end result is that there would be more. And more.
And while I may personally be interpreting this part, that endangers his wife and son. We know John doesn't want this kind of life for his son, so one could look at this as an attempt to make sure he doesn't grow up like Daddy. Which, of course, fails, but that's another story.
This is a very classic theme, one that's been done in Western movies to great effect before and is neither a plot hole nor bad storytelling. And persoanlly, I think it was brilliantly done.
MasochisticMuse said:
He probably could've, but if he did, he would've been constantly hunted down along his family. If he escapes by himself, the lawmen would've threatened or even killed his family to get to him. They did it once, wouldn't be past them to do it again. If he takes his family with him, he also endangers them by being with him. It's kinda of a lose-lose situation.
OT: No Russian in MW2, or just how the war against America started. Now this is an airport we're talking about, I don't see how the Russians could've missed the fact that Makarov, a well-known terrorist to have been the person that shot up the airport. If he was wearing a mask, maybe that could've been excusable, but he wasn't even covering up his face, surely they must've seen him on the cameras while they were performing the shootings. Not to mention, one of the squadmates dies as well as you, so how did the Russians miss a dead guy with a military issue gun right beside him? Granted, they probably have connections in the government, but I doubt that all the connections in the world would be able to cover up everything and blame it onto an American. Also, what happened to NATO?
Specualation on the Big Daddies aside, this is interesting. I'll soon finish my third play-through of Bioshock 1 and 2 and I don't recall this point on ADAM withdrawal ever being made in either. In both games it's stated plainly in multiple characters' exposition that people were driven to personality schizm ans grotesque mutation by excessive use of ADAM, not it's disuse. What source are you quoting for this statement?Pararaptor said:
Why were you blowing up a super computer at the end of Armored core, and why was Hustler 1 protecting it? The third expansion pack, and Armored Core 3 made more sense.