He even has worldly powers! The power to wed!Deleric said:This guy.
![]()
good too meet you brother.grimsprice said:Thank Sithis this wasn't what i thought it was.
I am a follower of the night mothers teachings...
please, we all know that Slaanesh is greater then them all. seriously she's the goddess of sex and self indulgence [and yes its a 'she' according to the eldar]Gardonash said:Hes not as awesome as Nurgle or Tzeench!iggyus said:BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!!!!
Khrone is simply the most badass thing EVAR!!! Just take a look at his greater daemon the Bloodthirster or the fact that he sits on a throne made of fucking skulls!!! I mean, how awesome is that?
Anyone that think the Romans just took the Greek gods and renamed them is wrong. Though there are some simularaties that would seem strikingly similar to someone that is not intamitaley informed the Greek and Roman pantheons. Not only are the attributes that were given to the gods different but also the rituals that were performed to pay tribute to them were differnet.Joshimodo said:Not as awesome as Tzneetch.iggyus said:BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!!!!
Khrone is simply the most badass thing EVAR!!! Just take a look at his greater daemon the Bloodthirster or the fact that he sits on a throne made of fucking skulls!!! I mean, how awesome is that?
Everyone already knows that the Romans simply took the Greek pantheon and renamed them. Chill.MortisLegio said:no offense but they're GREEK not Roman, sorry it just bugs me.
Mine would have to be the ones from The Elder Scrolls. It seems to be the only game series that puts any thought into their deities. Everything else is either elemental gods this or thinly disguised ancient beliefs that.
Also, Legend of Zelda's gods were pretty cool, despite being a blatant case of Powerpuff Girls syndrome.
EDIT:
Oh, and for the Khorne fans?
http://foros.emagister.com/fotos/1/3/4/6/5//240078tzeentch-1024.jpg
is superior to
http://www.freewebs.com/chednasad//photos/random-amusing/khorne.jpg
The good conscience is hilarious in B&W2.MaxTheReaper said:You in Black and White.
People don't believe in you?
You fucking set them on fire.
None of this "spreading the word" bullshit.
You spread with word by throwing people at mountains.
Yeah? Hence why all of my general mythology, Greek mythology and Roman mythology books state the original pantheon was copied from Greek mythos.The Black Adder said:Anyone that think the Romans just took the Greek gods and renamed them is wrong.
Show me something more crediable that wikipedia and a few measly examples.Joshimodo said:Yeah? Hence why all of my general mythology, Greek mythology and Roman mythology books state the original pantheon was copied from Greek mythos.The Black Adder said:Anyone that think the Romans just took the Greek gods and renamed them is wrong.
Also, to quote Wikipedia: "Roman mythology, or Latin mythology, refers to the mythological beliefs of the Italic people inhabiting the region of Latium and its main city, Ancient Rome. It can be considered as having two parts; One part, largely later and literary, consists of borrowings from Greek mythology."
The attributes of the original pantheon were identical. The offerings and ceremonies were different, but the gods themselves weren't.
Ares=Mars, Aphrodite=Venus, Hades=Pluto etc.
The Black Adder said:[Show me something more crediable that wikipedia and a few measly examples.
If my scanner worked, I'd scan off the pages from my books.The Romans gods were from a strange mixture of influences. Before Rome became a big city, the area around it, called Latium, was settled my superstitious villagers, the Latins, who believed in many gods and spirits. As Rome grew into a city and began to become more powerful it came into contact with the Greeks, who had a complex Pantheon of their own. It seems that the Roman gods were a mix of those two main influences; Latin and Greek. In many cases the Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
Why are you giving me evidence that disproves your original statement? I appreciate you going though all this effort to prove me wrong, but I don't need you to copy a page from a book. Like I said, while many gods are directly taken from the Greek Pantheon with little or no change, there are also many gods that are adapted from pre-Roman and even non-Latin dieties. Even the example that you gave me shows that they did not just rename the god. There was a seperate god that later became mixed or morphed with another god because of similarities. So therefore, they did not just rename them.Joshimodo said:The Black Adder said:[Show me something more crediable that wikipedia and a few measly examples.If my scanner worked, I'd scan off the pages from my books.The Romans gods were from a strange mixture of influences. Before Rome became a big city, the area around it, called Latium, was settled my superstitious villagers, the Latins, who believed in many gods and spirits. As Rome grew into a city and began to become more powerful it came into contact with the Greeks, who had a complex Pantheon of their own. It seems that the Roman gods were a mix of those two main influences; Latin and Greek. In many cases the Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
Looks like copying to me, and historians too. If I took your avatar, demeanour and awards, then just changed the name, that would be copying.The Black Adder said:Joshimodo said:Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
"I'm so happy, I could tear out your intestines and strangle you with them!"Cajt said:All hail Tho- Oh, gods in videogames.
Sheogorath, then. Just because he's freaking hilarious.
"Cheese for everyone! No, wait, cheese for no one."
Again, you miss what I'm saying! I said that you don't have to copy a page from a book with your scanner to show that you are right. If I knew nothing about Greek and Roman mythology why would I be arguing with you? I was merely saying that your inital statement "Everyone already knows that the Romans simply took the Greek pantheon and renamed them" was incorrect because that is only true for most gods, not all of them.Joshimodo said:Looks like copying to me, and historians too. If I took your avatar, demeanour and awards, then just changed the name, that would be copying.The Black Adder said:Joshimodo said:Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
Look up Greek/Roman mythology and deity history.