Gods in Videogames

Recommended Videos

Woem

New member
May 28, 2009
2,878
0
0
Deleric said:
This guy.

He even has worldly powers! The power to wed!

http://offbeatbride.com/2009/07/katamari-damacy-wedding
http://www.ksweddings.com/aidra_ernest/

My favorite god is Baldur's Gate's Sarevok.

 

Remleiz

New member
Jan 25, 2009
630
0
0
Gardonash said:
iggyus said:
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!!!!

Khrone is simply the most badass thing EVAR!!! Just take a look at his greater daemon the Bloodthirster or the fact that he sits on a throne made of fucking skulls!!! I mean, how awesome is that?
Hes not as awesome as Nurgle or Tzeench!
please, we all know that Slaanesh is greater then them all. seriously she's the goddess of sex and self indulgence [and yes its a 'she' according to the eldar]
 

The Black Adder

New member
Sep 14, 2008
283
0
0
Joshimodo said:
iggyus said:
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!!!!

Khrone is simply the most badass thing EVAR!!! Just take a look at his greater daemon the Bloodthirster or the fact that he sits on a throne made of fucking skulls!!! I mean, how awesome is that?
Not as awesome as Tzneetch.



MortisLegio said:
no offense but they're GREEK not Roman, sorry it just bugs me.
Everyone already knows that the Romans simply took the Greek pantheon and renamed them. Chill.


Mine would have to be the ones from The Elder Scrolls. It seems to be the only game series that puts any thought into their deities. Everything else is either elemental gods this or thinly disguised ancient beliefs that.

Also, Legend of Zelda's gods were pretty cool, despite being a blatant case of Powerpuff Girls syndrome.


EDIT:

Oh, and for the Khorne fans?

http://foros.emagister.com/fotos/1/3/4/6/5//240078tzeentch-1024.jpg

is superior to

http://www.freewebs.com/chednasad//photos/random-amusing/khorne.jpg
Anyone that think the Romans just took the Greek gods and renamed them is wrong. Though there are some simularaties that would seem strikingly similar to someone that is not intamitaley informed the Greek and Roman pantheons. Not only are the attributes that were given to the gods different but also the rituals that were performed to pay tribute to them were differnet.
 

Davey Woo

New member
Jan 9, 2009
2,468
0
0
I quite like the original gods from guild wars. (Balthazar, Dwayna, Melandru, Lyssa and Grenth.)
 

ConstantJoe

New member
Apr 10, 2009
482
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
You in Black and White.

People don't believe in you?
You fucking set them on fire.

None of this "spreading the word" bullshit.
You spread with word by throwing people at mountains.
The good conscience is hilarious in B&W2.
"And that's good, with a capital G!"
 

Joshimodo

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,956
0
0
The Black Adder said:
Anyone that think the Romans just took the Greek gods and renamed them is wrong.
Yeah? Hence why all of my general mythology, Greek mythology and Roman mythology books state the original pantheon was copied from Greek mythos.

Also, to quote Wikipedia: "Roman mythology, or Latin mythology, refers to the mythological beliefs of the Italic people inhabiting the region of Latium and its main city, Ancient Rome. It can be considered as having two parts; One part, largely later and literary, consists of borrowings from Greek mythology."

The attributes of the original pantheon were identical. The offerings and ceremonies were different, but the gods themselves weren't.


Ares=Mars, Aphrodite=Venus, Hades=Pluto etc.
 

The Black Adder

New member
Sep 14, 2008
283
0
0
Joshimodo said:
The Black Adder said:
Anyone that think the Romans just took the Greek gods and renamed them is wrong.
Yeah? Hence why all of my general mythology, Greek mythology and Roman mythology books state the original pantheon was copied from Greek mythos.

Also, to quote Wikipedia: "Roman mythology, or Latin mythology, refers to the mythological beliefs of the Italic people inhabiting the region of Latium and its main city, Ancient Rome. It can be considered as having two parts; One part, largely later and literary, consists of borrowings from Greek mythology."

The attributes of the original pantheon were identical. The offerings and ceremonies were different, but the gods themselves weren't.


Ares=Mars, Aphrodite=Venus, Hades=Pluto etc.
Show me something more crediable that wikipedia and a few measly examples.
 

Joshimodo

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,956
0
0
The Black Adder said:
[Show me something more crediable that wikipedia and a few measly examples.
The Romans gods were from a strange mixture of influences. Before Rome became a big city, the area around it, called Latium, was settled my superstitious villagers, the Latins, who believed in many gods and spirits. As Rome grew into a city and began to become more powerful it came into contact with the Greeks, who had a complex Pantheon of their own. It seems that the Roman gods were a mix of those two main influences; Latin and Greek. In many cases the Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
If my scanner worked, I'd scan off the pages from my books.
 

The Black Adder

New member
Sep 14, 2008
283
0
0
Joshimodo said:
The Black Adder said:
[Show me something more crediable that wikipedia and a few measly examples.
The Romans gods were from a strange mixture of influences. Before Rome became a big city, the area around it, called Latium, was settled my superstitious villagers, the Latins, who believed in many gods and spirits. As Rome grew into a city and began to become more powerful it came into contact with the Greeks, who had a complex Pantheon of their own. It seems that the Roman gods were a mix of those two main influences; Latin and Greek. In many cases the Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
If my scanner worked, I'd scan off the pages from my books.
Why are you giving me evidence that disproves your original statement? I appreciate you going though all this effort to prove me wrong, but I don't need you to copy a page from a book. Like I said, while many gods are directly taken from the Greek Pantheon with little or no change, there are also many gods that are adapted from pre-Roman and even non-Latin dieties. Even the example that you gave me shows that they did not just rename the god. There was a seperate god that later became mixed or morphed with another god because of similarities. So therefore, they did not just rename them.
 

Joshimodo

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,956
0
0
The Black Adder said:
Joshimodo said:
Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
Looks like copying to me, and historians too. If I took your avatar, demeanour and awards, then just changed the name, that would be copying.


Look up Greek/Roman mythology and deity history.
 

sarahvait

New member
Nov 6, 2008
441
0
0
Cajt said:
All hail Tho- Oh, gods in videogames.

Sheogorath, then. Just because he's freaking hilarious.

"Cheese for everyone! No, wait, cheese for no one."
"I'm so happy, I could tear out your intestines and strangle you with them!"
 

The Black Adder

New member
Sep 14, 2008
283
0
0
Joshimodo said:
The Black Adder said:
Joshimodo said:
Romans found there was a Latin and a Greek god for one and the same thing. They tended to take the two and make them one. So for example, Vulcan, was the old Latin god of fire. But the Greeks had a god called Hephaistos, who was very similar. And so the Romans just mixed the two together and made them one. Paintings or statues of Vulcan generally showed him as a blacksmith, like the Greek Hephaistos, but his name still was the Latin Vulcan.
Looks like copying to me, and historians too. If I took your avatar, demeanour and awards, then just changed the name, that would be copying.


Look up Greek/Roman mythology and deity history.
Again, you miss what I'm saying! I said that you don't have to copy a page from a book with your scanner to show that you are right. If I knew nothing about Greek and Roman mythology why would I be arguing with you? I was merely saying that your inital statement "Everyone already knows that the Romans simply took the Greek pantheon and renamed them" was incorrect because that is only true for most gods, not all of them.
 

Cap'n Haddock

New member
Jul 28, 2009
90
0
0
Vivec. I managed to kill him once, it was awesome.

and @ Joshimundo; The Black Adder gets his name from the excellent british television series of that name. And while the Romans do have a reputation for copying many elements of other cultures (the toga, a distinctively Roman article of clothing actually originates from the Etruscans, a people from the North/Middle of Italy, while the Romans are from southern Italy), but not only did they copy many elements of other cultures (like the Greeks and Etruscans) but also improved or altered those elements to their own desires, just like their architecture, weaponry and society.