Gotham City Sirens DCEU movie confirmed.

Recommended Videos

Lieju

New member
Jan 4, 2009
3,044
0
0
DudeistBelieve said:
Oh my fucking god yes!

Please Reformed Riddler! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE AS FUCK, GIVE ME REFORMED RIDDLER!!!
Hmmm as much as I love the reformed Riddler (or really... any Riddler apart from that time he got plastic surgery and became a bishie) he isn't established in the DCEU at the time at all, is he? Although I guess the character is well known enough at this point that you could just put him in as a private investigator without much explanation.

IDK, I still haven't seen suicide squad (although I will) and I dunno if I'll see this in theatres but I will check it out eventually and hope it's okay.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
Samtemdo8 said:
But you run the risk of turning it into a Marvel clone, completely destroying any identity of its own. And I want my DC to be Dark and Serious like Watchmen.
"Dark and Serious"? What does that even mean? If BvS was "dark"--- sorry, "Dark and Serious", then apparently it means immature, idiotic, violent, incoherent, tone-deaf, masculinist, and so on. BvS was a film so catastrophically and offensively banal I actually feel dumberer just thinking about it...

Snyder's Dark and Serious seems to be a particularly angsty, petulant, teenage boy grimacing, growling, and posturing in the mirror and wishing he could be out killing or destroying things - bein' all cool and badasss and tortured'n'stuff! - as opposed to doing his homework.

...if you didn't mean to imply Dark and Serious was supposed to be mature or intelligent as well, then apologies - Snyder's work is certainly neither of those things (though I think BvS is some kind of perfect storm of systemic incompetence and tonal anxiety, so it's not entirely Synder's fault).

Kyrian007 said:
DC has the irrational fear that making a single joke will ruin their "dark and serious" tone and make audiences say the movie is "for kids."
Which ironically led to the incredibly childish BvS.

I'm no fan of DC's roster at all, but I do like quality comicbook films (Nolan's first two Batman films are genre classics, even with Begins' weak action finale. and whilst I despise the Fox X-Men continuity, I do really like The Wolverine, its own crappy action finale aside) - and I'd still love to see the film hinted at in the first Man Of Steel teaser; a film seemingly promising hope and inspiration, with a few Malick-esque visual/tonal flourishes.


It's safe to say we never got that - and the DCCU's tottered around aimlessly ever since.

...well, no, in the process of said tottering it vandalised Superman, Batman ('Derp, 1% chance = World's Greatest Detective! Best Batman is CrossFit Batman! Batman SMASH!'), any chance of a decent cinematic Lex in this continuity, a certain iconic [if apparently not actually very good] Supes' event, Doomsday, a crassly discarded Jimmy Olsen[footnote]To quote the dimwit himself, Snyder: "...we don't have room for Jimmy Olsen in our big pantheon of characters, but we can have fun with him, right?". That's right, Zacky-boy... having "fun" with a character by unceremoniously executing them. Suddenly BvS's braindead Batman makes sense... [/footnote], and the Justice League's thematic live-action debut ('Um, here's some clips... with logos we made, because why not?'). That film really was impressively awful to such a degree that it seems like a conscious act of sabotage.

Fingers crossed for Wonder Woman, but given Snyder's still got a co-story credit, that could end up as another misstep. I don't think Snyder has a credit on the 2019 solo Affleck/Johns Batman film at all (beyond some form of producer role, I assume), so its odds seem even better.
 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
Darth Rosenberg said:
Samtemdo8 said:
But you run the risk of turning it into a Marvel clone, completely destroying any identity of its own. And I want my DC to be Dark and Serious like Watchmen.
"Dark and Serious"? What does that even mean? If BvS was "dark"--- sorry, "Dark and Serious", then apparently it means immature, idiotic, violent, incoherent, tone-deaf, masculinist, and so on. BvS was a film so catastrophically and offensively banal I actually feel dumberer just thinking about it...

Snyder's Dark and Serious seems to be a particularly angsty, petulant, teenage boy grimacing, growling, and posturing in the mirror and wishing he could be out killing or destroying things - bein' all cool and badasss and tortured'n'stuff! - as opposed to doing his homework.

...if you didn't mean to imply Dark and Serious was supposed to be mature or intelligent as well, then apologies - Snyder's work is certainly neither of those things (though I think BvS is some kind of perfect storm of systemic incompetence and tonal anxiety, so it's not entirely Synder's fault).

Kyrian007 said:
DC has the irrational fear that making a single joke will ruin their "dark and serious" tone and make audiences say the movie is "for kids."
Which ironically led to the incredibly childish BvS.

I'm no fan of DC's roster at all, but I do like quality comicbook films (Nolan's first two Batman films are genre classics, even with Begins' weak action finale. and whilst I despise the Fox X-Men continuity, I do really like The Wolverine, its own crappy action finale aside) - and I'd still love to see the film hinted at in the first Man Of Steel teaser; a film seemingly promising hope and inspiration, with a few Malick-esque visual/tonal flourishes.


It's safe to say we never got that - and the DCCU's tottered around aimlessly ever since.

...well, no, in the process of said tottering it vandalised Superman, Batman ('Derp, 1% chance = World's Greatest Detective! Best Batman is CrossFit Batman! Batman SMASH!'), any chance of a decent cinematic Lex in this continuity, a certain iconic [if apparently not actually very good] Supes' event, Doomsday, a crassly discarded Jimmy Olsen[footnote]To quote the dimwit himself, Snyder: "...we don't have room for Jimmy Olsen in our big pantheon of characters, but we can have fun with him, right?". That's right, Zacky-boy... having "fun" with a character by unceremoniously executing them. Suddenly BvS's braindead Batman makes sense... [/footnote], and the Justice League's thematic live-action debut ('Um, here's some clips... with logos we made, because why not?'). That film really was impressively awful to such a degree that it seems like a conscious act of sabotage.

Fingers crossed for Wonder Woman, but given Snyder's still got a co-story credit, that could end up as another misstep. I don't think Snyder has a credit on the 2019 solo Affleck/Johns Batman film at all (beyond some form of producer role, I assume), so its odds seem even better.

"Snyder's Dark and Serious seems to be a particularly angsty, petulant, teenage boy grimacing, growling, and posturing in the mirror and wishing he could be out killing or destroying things - bein' all cool and badasss and tortured'n'stuff! - as opposed to doing his homework."

Yeah that's cool. Your talking to someone that enjoys this kind of music:


To me this is cool:


THIS is lame:

 

Samtemdo8_v1legacy

New member
Aug 2, 2015
7,915
0
0
And for the record I love Superman, but I honestly could not give a damn about Jimmy Olson, the best Superman comics I have read had little to do with Jimmy Olson. And I always found him disinteresting even as a kid watching the Animated Series.

And considering I don't care for Lois in the movies so far, hey one less worthless human charcater.