this debate causes the most pretentious remarks to surface.
Bottom line, Video games are a visual medium, graphics aren't at war with gameplay, they should compliment eachother. You couldn't have a Mass Effect 2 with Atari 2600 graphics.. it's just infeasible. If you pay 60 dollars for something, there's nothing wrong with expecting it to be a quality product. Good graphics won't save a horrible game, and terrific gameplay won't save a current gen game if it has graphics that are more then a generation old (like, If a 360 game came out with N64 graphics).
Bottom line, Video games are a visual medium, graphics aren't at war with gameplay, they should compliment eachother. You couldn't have a Mass Effect 2 with Atari 2600 graphics.. it's just infeasible. If you pay 60 dollars for something, there's nothing wrong with expecting it to be a quality product. Good graphics won't save a horrible game, and terrific gameplay won't save a current gen game if it has graphics that are more then a generation old (like, If a 360 game came out with N64 graphics).