Made me laugh.Article said:"First person shoot em-up" as they are known in the gaming world
EDIT: Why are they consulting the Christian lobby? That doesn't seem fair or necessary.
Made me laugh.Article said:"First person shoot em-up" as they are known in the gaming world
Well, if kids today want to spoil that fun with "rights rage" then so be it. They already know everything, so what can we tell them?RhombusHatesYou said:That was half the bloody fun of it - getting away with something you shouldn't have been doing.UberNoodle said:We never kidded ourselves to assume any rights over it.
because they're loud and have money.BlacklightVirus said:Why are they consulting the Christian lobby? That doesn't seem fair or necessary.
But don't you see? The reason this happened is because there was no R 18 rating!RhombusHatesYou said:Fallout 3 isn't a good example. Certainly the gamed was initially refused classification for having 'morphine' as the game's healing drug. Bethesda responded by replacing 'morphine' with 'stimpack' in all versions of the game, so it's not like there's a special version just for Australia.brendonnelly said:I don't think you guys realise this, but the lack of an R 18+ in Australia has ensured some games to be censored in order to get past the regulations without being banned. One example of this is fallout 3. Australian gamers have wanted this for a long time, Im not sure what you lot are complaining about.
Oh, that makes sense.RhombusHatesYou said:because they're loud and have money.BlacklightVirus said:Why are they consulting the Christian lobby? That doesn't seem fair or necessary.
Whoopty fucking do... The reason it's a bad example is because it changed nothing. It didn't change how anything worked in the game, it didn't remove anything from the game, it didn't require a massive rewrite of any code (seriously, if you want morphine back in FO3, its like a 10 minute job in GECK... well, if you were smart enough to buy it for PC, anyway).brendonnelly said:But don't you see? The reason this happened is because there was no R 18 rating!RhombusHatesYou said:Fallout 3 isn't a good example. Certainly the gamed was initially refused classification for having 'morphine' as the game's healing drug. Bethesda responded by replacing 'morphine' with 'stimpack' in all versions of the game, so it's not like there's a special version just for Australia.brendonnelly said:I don't think you guys realise this, but the lack of an R 18+ in Australia has ensured some games to be censored in order to get past the regulations without being banned. One example of this is fallout 3. Australian gamers have wanted this for a long time, Im not sure what you lot are complaining about.
What gave you that idea? This isn't something being imposed by a political master party overnight. It has only just been given serious recognition in the federal cabinet and still needs to go through lots of political hoops yet. The current classification laws are something leftover from what, the 1990's or something. It's slowly being amended and updated, with all considerations brought to the table, that's a good thing.Zaik said:Moromillas said:Sure.PrimoThePro said:I feel like the control in Australia keeps going over more and more to the government. Can an Aussie intelligently explain the whole political situation down there?
An age ago, the attorneys-general (think jedi council for all things legal) got together and decided that these awful things called "video games" are only intended for children, and any game that has "horrible stuff" it it should be banned. Hence they didn't see a need for an R18+ rating. We don't have an R18+ rating.
I'd say about 90% of the games in EB atm (that are rated 15+) are rated 18+ overseas. To achieve a 15+ rating, either the classification board sugar coats the violent themes, or the game is heavily modified (censored), this also attributes to cost increase. Any game that can't get this 15+ rating is banned from sale, yet an 18+ game can still be shipped in from overseas, more cost increase/stress for local business. They're also still games intended for adults, with or without censorship, the "15+" on the box is often a lie. Parents also seem to have no idea about the disparity between our VG ratings and the ones overseas, and at the end of the day they're the ones who should decide what to buy their kids, they're the ones who should be more informed.
If we get an R18+ rating, then this banning and censoring nonsense wouldn't be happening.
To be honest, despite it being off topic, i'd actually like to ask his question as applied across the whole political spectrum down there(actually thought that was what he was going for). From what i hear and read and piece together, i've got you guys slated for a socialist dictatorship in 10-45 years. Not that we in the US aren't headed that way, however we've not had all our effective firearms outlawed and seized yet.
I haven't trusted any media at all since the first time George Negus retired.Treblaine said:Only that you shouldn't trust ANY print media.
Because the First Fleet also brought with them prestigious officials, scientists, Captains, tradespeople to Australia, from Europe. Hardly anyone Australian today is a direct descendant from a convict.PoisonUnagi said:Awweeesome! I be happy for ye
EDIT: I showed this to my brother, he went on to say that every Australian ever is a complete douchebag for a single underarm bowling incident in 1981. I said that was a bullshit reason, he then said that every Australian ever is a complete douchebag for being descended purely from convicts.
So how much help can I get with demolishing him?
*laughs*Zaik said:i've got you guys slated for a socialist dictatorship in 10-45 years.
Maybe, you can make your own Decisions. One under 18 in all of Australia... so do you think, that based on one person, that rules shouldn't be changed?Nintendolover222 said:My level of maturity is not the reason my parents prohibit these things, it's that good Christians shouldn't be playing or watching them. I think I should be allowed to make my own decisions regarding what I watch and play, especially seeing as I understand perfectly the vast difference between reality and works of fiction such as violent movies and video games.Zeriah said:It is your parents who decided this, not the government. Unfortunately for you, if your parents think you are not ready for such content well, it could be possible that you aren't. You don't think you should be entitled to go buy porn from the corner shop, or see R18+ movies do you? Games should be the same as everything else.Nintendolover222 said:Hmm... of course, you're totally right, I shouldn't be making my own decisions and I should let the government regulate what I experience because they know much better than I do what I should be doing with my life.mudshovel said:Sorry, but you really shouldn't be playing those games anyway.Nintendolover222 said:The federal Cabinet has approved an adult rating for computer games after finding that many classified as suitable for 15-year-olds in Australia had been ruled suitable for adults only overseas.
As many as 50 games are now available to children as young as 15 but should rightly be played by over-18s only.
...
Seventeen days before my fifteenth birthday, my government decides 'hey, we've made an R18+ rating, and that means fifteen year olds can't play all those games they used to be allowed to!'
Plus, my parents were sceptical about me buying the M (Teen) rated Medal Of Honour 10th Anniversary, so there's no way in hell they'd buy me an R rated game that used to be MA.
I was so close to just being able to go into a game retailer and legally buy all these games, without having to get friends to or go through some other ridiculous method. Now I have to wait another three fucking years. And of course then it'll be election time and of course someone's going to get elected and introduce... I don't know, an AO21+ rating or something.
Timing couldn't have been worse for me![]()
If we don't have an R18+ rating, games like Left 4 Dead 2 get censored or banned.
It horrifies me when students in my year 7 Science class talk about playing CoD or Fallout 3.
Of course, I might just be an arrogant little brat, mightn't I?
Well, the gun laws are obviously the black sheep in the room, however more recently they are actively banning things frivolously that don't really make sense such as small breasts, projectile urine, and banning additional websites at an ISP level that aren't related to the two. It seems like they are testing the waters at eroding free speech rather than just being typical retarded backwards politicians.Moromillas said:What gave you that idea? This isn't something being imposed by a political master party overnight. It has only just been given serious recognition in the federal cabinet and still needs to go through lots of political hoops yet. The current classification laws are something leftover from what, the 1990's or something. It's slowly being amended and updated, with all considerations brought to the table, that's a good thing.Zaik said:Moromillas said:Sure.PrimoThePro said:I feel like the control in Australia keeps going over more and more to the government. Can an Aussie intelligently explain the whole political situation down there?
An age ago, the attorneys-general (think jedi council for all things legal) got together and decided that these awful things called "video games" are only intended for children, and any game that has "horrible stuff" it it should be banned. Hence they didn't see a need for an R18+ rating. We don't have an R18+ rating.
I'd say about 90% of the games in EB atm (that are rated 15+) are rated 18+ overseas. To achieve a 15+ rating, either the classification board sugar coats the violent themes, or the game is heavily modified (censored), this also attributes to cost increase. Any game that can't get this 15+ rating is banned from sale, yet an 18+ game can still be shipped in from overseas, more cost increase/stress for local business. They're also still games intended for adults, with or without censorship, the "15+" on the box is often a lie. Parents also seem to have no idea about the disparity between our VG ratings and the ones overseas, and at the end of the day they're the ones who should decide what to buy their kids, they're the ones who should be more informed.
If we get an R18+ rating, then this banning and censoring nonsense wouldn't be happening.
To be honest, despite it being off topic, i'd actually like to ask his question as applied across the whole political spectrum down there(actually thought that was what he was going for). From what i hear and read and piece together, i've got you guys slated for a socialist dictatorship in 10-45 years. Not that we in the US aren't headed that way, however we've not had all our effective firearms outlawed and seized yet.
Your brother is partly right. Just replace every with most. We will never, ever forgive them for that. It's just one of those grudges that you don't let go of.PoisonUnagi said:I showed this to my brother, he went on to say that every Australian ever is a complete douchebag for a single underarm bowling incident in 1981.
At least I know i'm not alone, heh.RhombusHatesYou said:*laughs*Zaik said:i've got you guys slated for a socialist dictatorship in 10-45 years.
People have been saying that since before Federation (that'd be Jan 1, 1901).
29 years is a bit long to stay butthurt. He should go see a doctor to get a medicated ointment or something.PoisonUnagi said:EDIT: I showed this to my brother, he went on to say that every Australian ever is a complete douchebag for a single underarm bowling incident in 1981.
Estimates are that less than 10% of the Australian population have any convict heritage. Compare that to the 25% of the population that weren't born in Australia. Should I even bother mentioning that South Australia was never a penal colony? (although many cunts in the Eastern States will counter that it's always been a penile colony).I said that was a bullshit reason, he then said that every Australian ever is a complete douchebag for being descended purely from convicts.
So how much help can I get with demolishing him?