- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,802
- 3,383
- 118
- Country
- 'Merica
- Gender
- 3 children in a trench coat
No, it would be like taking the Mona LisalSHaDoW-FoXl said:No, it's really not. If anything, it's a lot more like painting on the frame or beside it. There is still noticeably damage done, but not to the actual piece its self. And I didn't list your other examples because it would be incredibly redundant. Don't talk to me about class when you wished people to face the worst possible scenario over a crime which never actually harmed anyone or anything. The way you make it out to be you'd think that they literally wrote the message on the drawing its self to the point to where it's not even noticeable anymore. And honestly, maybe they should have. Because perhaps then that would get the point across that some of the harm we bring legitimately can't be undone.Gundam GP01 said:The plateau where the lines sit is basically the canvas. A more accurate analogy is if you were to break into the Louvre and paint your own bullshit political message on the painting, right next to her face, all while leaving some nasty gashes on the side of the painting.
Also, I love how you just focused on a faction of my examples while ignoring the rest.
Classy, bro. Real fucking classy.

and painting a slogan above her head.
Sure there's basically nothing there in the background, but it doesn't mean the painting isn't ruined.
And yes, I do think that the lives of a few fuckwits are worth significantly less than centuries old historical treasures.