True, but as far as I know, the OP is not Gordon Freeman, nor Chuck Norris, therefor, I believe the Gonarch is more than a match for him. Plus, it stays with the theme of "I'm, going to send a headcrab to you in the night unless you buy HL1"HG131 said:Why not send Freeman? He won, not the Gonarch.j0z said:LAMAAR ISN'T DEAD! She can't be! can't be...HG131 said:Lamaar? She's pathetic (debeaked, can't zombify (Holy ******* ****, Zombify is not a word. My Spell Checker however suggested Combine!) you) and dead. Send a bunch of Manhacks or an advisor.j0z said:...
It is up there with DOOM and Wolfenstein as one of the most influential PC FPSs ever made. Now, I want you to open up your Steam client, and go to the Steam Store, and Buy either Half Life, or Half Life: Source (Source is a port to the same engine as HL2, but the difference is not huge)
It is a must-play.
Get it.
Get it now.
Or I will send Lamaar after you in your sleep.
Okay, I'll send a Gonarch after you! Beat THAT!
speaking as someone who played hl2 before hl1, I'd say not really. You could, and you probably wouldn't regret it, but hl2 is an amazing enough experience to be played on it's owntthor said:would a person want to play halflife 1 before they play halflife2?Segadroid said:I have the ENTIRE available series, so I can explain.
HL1 had exellent gameplay for the time, using a modified Quake 2 engine. It was praised with alot of trophees. However, when HL2 came out... Oh boy, totally new experience!
Half-Life 1 made Valve wildly successful. They won a ton of game of year awards, and made them enough money to allow them to work on HL2 for 6 years without releasing another product (besides a few expansion packs and commercialized mods). In fact, Half-Life sold more in ti's third year of release than its first.Onyx Oblivion said:I bought Half-life one. It's not bad, but I regret buying it. You can clearly see why its the sequel that made Valve so successful.
Pretty much this. Every time you play a shooter where the story is presented in anyway other than a cutscene, you can thank Valve. It may seem samey and cooridor-ey now compared to the Call of Duties and Mass Effects of today, but it was revolutionary for its time. And in my opinion, its still hella fun now.Grampy_bone said:Playing Half-Life today is like watching Seinfeld or the Matrix. What it did is now commonplace but when it was released there was quite literally nothing like it. Back then all shooters were rooms + guns + monsters. Half-life took the same basic concept and introduced a much more dynamic-seeming and enthralling experience through the use of subtle in-game storytelling, cinematics, and scripted events. FPS games have been trying to emulate this cinematic style with varying success ever since.
So if you want to see who did it first and how, then you owe it to yourself to play through Half-Life. just be warned that the game sorta stinks after you get to Xen.
You're probably one of the few 15 year old's that have played it. Kids these days are into their DS's and PSP's.Resistance205 said:I...I....WHAT!?
Sorry but as a gamer, you have to know about Half Life 1...You have to, otherwise I will lose all faith in gamers! Thats the next step after losing faith in humanity!
I'm 15 and Half Life 1 is one of my favorite games of all time, age shouldn't matter when it comes to games.Mr.Black said:Half-Life 1 is 11 years old, you haven't heard of it because you're young? Half-Life was awesome, I loved every minute of it, and when HL2 was announced and we saw what it looked like, it was the most realistic game ever conceived by man.
I understand that. Wasn't my point. Was just saying HL2 probably wouldn't have been nearly as big if it wasn't for how successful HL1 was and how awesome it was in its time. It does get old now.Onyx Oblivion said:Look. I'm not against old games. Not in the least. I've had a ton of fun with some of them. But its archaic at this point. The gameplay is just plodding along grabbing health and ammo, with only the story pushing me forward. Also, I'm killing any scientist who stops while following me and says, "I CAN GO NO FURTHER!" And the story is running out of Steam. I haven't played it in a over a week. I doubt I'll ever finish it. The shooting isn't fun, and the story kinda sucks.
I wouldn't say "is". The project is practically on life support.Nimbus said:Also, Black Mesa Source is going to fucking rock!
I'm 13 years old and I've played Half-Life, really awesome game. I was scared so many times, especially with the headcrabs jumping out at you.Mr.Black said:You're probably one of the few 15 year old's that have played it. Kids these days are into their DS's and PSP's.Resistance205 said:I...I....WHAT!?
Sorry but as a gamer, you have to know about Half Life 1...You have to, otherwise I will lose all faith in gamers! Thats the next step after losing faith in humanity!
I'm 15 and Half Life 1 is one of my favorite games of all time, age shouldn't matter when it comes to games.Mr.Black said:Half-Life 1 is 11 years old, you haven't heard of it because you're young? Half-Life was awesome, I loved every minute of it, and when HL2 was announced and we saw what it looked like, it was the most realistic game ever conceived by man.
It's recommended, alot of the backstory will be explained if you finish it all. Be advised, though, the graphics don't look anywhere near the quality of today.tthor said:Would a person want to play half life 1 before they play half life 2?Segadroid said:I have the ENTIRE available series, so I can explain.
HL1 had exellent gameplay for the time, using a modified Quake 2 engine. It was praised with alot of trophees. However, when HL2 came out... Oh boy, totally new experience!
Don't you expend the same effort (if not more) in making a thread here, than looking it up yourself?tthor said:i am not a troll,Fasckira said:Surely the op is a troll? Even if he is still quite young, a swift google search would have told him what it is and common sense would have told him it was obviously the first game to pre-date HL2. I mean, HL2 does enough to reference the first game at the beginning with everyone remarking how long its been.
just too lazy to bother googling
You liked it but...it was a facepalm-inducing nightmare?Valate said:Half-Life(one) was a facepalm-inducing nightmare. I liked every minute of it, just a lot less than Half-Life 2 and the following episodes.
Half Life 1 has aged very well.Nimbus said:Not really. It hasn't aged very well.tthor said:would a person want to play halflife 1 before they play halflife2?Segadroid said:I have the ENTIRE available series, so I can explain.
HL1 had exellent gameplay for the time, using a modified Quake 2 engine. It was praised with alot of trophees. However, when HL2 came out... Oh boy, totally new experience!
I will point you to the Black Mesa Source project, which is basically "make HL1 look better than everything", it's a freelance project mod to overhaul the graphics.Segadroid said:It's recommended, alot of the backstory will be explained if you finish it all. Be advised, though, the graphics don't look anywhere near the quality of today.tthor said:Would a person want to play half life 1 before they play half life 2?Segadroid said:I have the ENTIRE available series, so I can explain.
HL1 had exellent gameplay for the time, using a modified Quake 2 engine. It was praised with alot of trophees. However, when HL2 came out... Oh boy, totally new experience!